Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦
ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。
概要
[edit]推薦にあたって
[edit]推薦者のためのガイドライン
[edit]まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。
ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。
- 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
- コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
- スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
- フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
- 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
- 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
- デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
- 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
- たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
- 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
- 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。
技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。
- 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
- 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
- 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
- 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。
グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。
- 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
- ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
- 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
- テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
- 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
- バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
- 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
- 主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
- 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
- 画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。
画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。
新規推薦
[edit]推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。
ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。
ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。
ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}
投票
[edit]投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:
- {{支持}}または{{Support}} (
Support、
Support),
- {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} (
Oppose、
Oppose),
- {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} (
Neutral、
Neutral),
- {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} (
Comment、
Comment),
- 情報:{{Info}} (
Info),
- 質問:{{Question}} (
Question).
テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。
あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや(
Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。
秀逸な画像からの除外
[edit]時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Keep 及び {{維持}}
Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}}
Delist 及び {{除外}}
Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。
あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。
あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。
- 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
- その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
- あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。
次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}
秀逸な画像の候補での方針
[edit]総則
[edit]- 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
- 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
- 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
- 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート
{{withdraw|~~~~}}
を加えます。 - ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
- 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
- テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。
秀逸と除外のルール
[edit]候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。
- 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
- 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
- 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
- 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。
除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Delist (
Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。
常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。
何よりも礼儀を忘れずに
[edit]どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。
それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。
関連項目
[edit]- 候補リストの編集はこちら:Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- 日付順秀逸な画像リスト:Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- 推薦・投票の完了方法:Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
- 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
- Photography critiques(画像評論)
- Help:スキャニング
目次
[edit]秀逸な画像の候補
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_indoors
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry
Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 14:21:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose OK, I'm going to go ahead and FPX this one, but as you're a new nominator, I'll give you some tips. 1) Feature Pictures are among the very best that exist on Commons, a tiny percentage of the millions of pictures on the site. In order to make it, the image either has to show something truly significant, like a famous person or event, or be of exceptional technical quality - sometimes both. Only nominate your very best images for this category. 2) It may be a good idea to first get some feedback over at QIC. As you can see from the process there, this image is not likely to succeed even there; the points of the low resolution and quality being mentioned. If an image succeeds in becoming a QI, then perhaps consider nominating it for FP. Best of luck. --Peulle (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the quality is too low to have a chance of reaching FP status.--Peulle (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 22:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Please check the crop at the left, some background is visible --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, it is hard to recognize on a white background, I have fixed it.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Very high resolution, good focus, feeling of space with this large background -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Yes, a clear FP.--Peulle (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Dragon? --Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Li Phi falls with colorful sky from elevated zip line platform at sunset in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not everything was spectacular at this time, and not all the craftmen were prodigies like Michael Angelo :-) Ordinary architectural element in my view (also for the period). Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Am I mispercieving this or is the image tinted yellow? Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. I can possibly make the photo a little less yellow.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2024(UTC)
- @Henrysz: I have reduced the yellow color, Thanks for your comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Awesome action shot Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support
Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support
Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the internal mosaic of the apse where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin, but the framing is a bit too large in my view Still better too large than too tight :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing puddling position of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail WLB MG 2022.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ulrichsberg Panorama SSO 20240704.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas and well handled. Panorama-stitching can be very tough, but this result is top tier. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Plac Wilsona Warsaw 2022 aerial.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
秀逸除外候補
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 12:14:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by NASA ESA CSA / Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean S. Pearson, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Huge resolution image of the Orion Nebula and Trapezium Cluster by the James Webb Space Telescope. -- Yann (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_indoors
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Good picture of this famous statue. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 22:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry
Info The one and only quality image of this building is from 2006 so I tried to catch the current look with current technical quality. The shape of the building is a truncated cone, which means that the vertical lines in the photo cannot be exactly vertical. Created/uploaded/nominated by Lynx1211 -- Lynx1211 (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ah, sod it - yes, I support. I was going to oppose it when I saw the thumbnail, as I thought of it as "just another windmill", but after looking at the full size, I think the technical quality is very high and the light is just right for the composition.--Peulle (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 14:21:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose OK, I'm going to go ahead and FPX this one, but as you're a new nominator, I'll give you some tips. 1) Feature Pictures are among the very best that exist on Commons, a tiny percentage of the millions of pictures on the site. In order to make it, the image either has to show something truly significant, like a famous person or event, or be of exceptional technical quality - sometimes both. Only nominate your very best images for this category. 2) It may be a good idea to first get some feedback over at QIC. As you can see from the process there, this image is not likely to succeed even there; the points of the low resolution and quality being mentioned. If an image succeeds in becoming a QI, then perhaps consider nominating it for FP. Best of luck. --Peulle (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the quality is too low to have a chance of reaching FP status.--Peulle (talk) 10:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2024 at 13:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Perspective (left is leaning in), and I think it's also a bit too soft, looking at the mountain in particular.--Peulle (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for your feedback! I've uploaded a new version with corrected perspective (you may need to use SHIFT+Reload to see the changes), not much I can do about the sharpness. --Kabelleger (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 22:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Please check the crop at the left, some background is visible --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, it is hard to recognize on a white background, I have fixed it.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 20:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
Info Interior of the church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Butuceni, Orhei, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Image full of details, without noise and well defined despite obvious difficulties due to the side lighting alone. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 14:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Very high resolution, good focus, feeling of space with this large background -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Basile. -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Yes, a clear FP.--Peulle (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 12:39:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Portraits
Info created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Cybertrip - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 12:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Carnivora_(Carnivores)
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Grand. Epic. Cinematic. Wanderer above the sea of fog vibes Henrysz (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 11:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Emydidae (Pond Turtles)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Dragon? --Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Li Phi falls with colorful sky from elevated zip line platform at sunset in Don Khon Si Phan Don Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2024 at 04:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
Info Zernez, decoration on the vaults of the Reformed Church San Mauritius. The church can first be seen at the end of the 13th century. These rich decorations were probably applied from 1609 onwards. See Reformierte Kirche Zernez
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Unexceptional subject for me. Roughly made and not well painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, we can no longer hold the craftsmen of the year 1609 accountable for the (in your eyes) poor work they delivered.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not everything was spectacular at this time, and not all the craftmen were prodigies like Michael Angelo :-) Ordinary architectural element in my view (also for the period). Nothing special, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Am I mispercieving this or is the image tinted yellow? Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. I can possibly make the photo a little less yellow.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2024(UTC)
- @Henrysz: I have reduced the yellow color, Thanks for your comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info created by Tracychapmanfan5 - uploaded by Tracychapmanfan5 - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 22:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created by National Institute for Fusion Science - uploaded by National Institute for Fusion Science - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of a boy feeding hay to a cow in a paddy field at golden hour in Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 20:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Of course --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice golden hour light -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Captured the moment. --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Very nice! BigDom (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Awesome action shot Henrysz (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 19:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Bruno Tamm, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Perspective correction required. ★ 19:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support
Corrected. ★ 01:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- wide-angle don't need perspective fix, you changed it to another image completely different from the original author conception, IMHO, should be uploaded in another image Wilfredor (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Gorgeous colors and light Henrysz (talk) 22:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment There seems to be 2 dust spots in the sky. Notes added -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Charles Marville (1813–1879), restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann, after a suggestion of LucaLindholm
Support Old picture of Paris, before the time of Haussman's renovation. -- Yann (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann, Thank you so much for having done it by yourself. In the last two weeks I switched to Mac from Windows and I'm also developing also a little web site, so I was mentally occupied with those and other things. ;D LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 16:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Caprimulgidae_(Nightjars)
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 11:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info Mark Twain photo portrait. Created by Unknown - uploaded by Grendelkhan - partially restored by Yann - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Abstain Calling for Adam Cuerden to help to complete this restoration. -- ★ 11:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2024 at 06:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info Kasbah Amridil, Marocco (قصبة امريديل), old Fortress in Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 06:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Captures the large subject in a single exposure without artifacts or atmospheric distortion. The only things missing from the image are Joe Strummer, Mick Jones, Paul Simonon and Topper Headon. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 21:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support If it were better developed this image would really be a gem, but due to the size of the JPG and evaluating what the RAW would be like, this photo should have greater potential. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand well, Wilfredor is not very happy that the image wheighs "only" 16.11 MB and is saying that I should have uploaded a version that weighs more MB. It is true that I uploaded a version that was compressed with Photoshop to a quality of 11 out of 12. But I strongly disagree with his statement for many reasons :
- 1) The rules don't forbid small jpg compression (they only forbid strong compression). Actually the rules even recommend using a jpg compression of minimum 80 or 90% and this is what was done here with a 92% compression ;
- 2) A compression of 11 out of 12 has a result of pratically no difference compared to a 12/12 quality export. Even zooming at 200% and comparing pixel by pixel I never saw any difference between the two with the naked eye ;
- 3) Usually I only do the 11/12 instead of letting the 12/12 when the image size is above 20 MB. Excessive file sizes are bad for many reasons ;
- 4) Wiki Commons has available storage issues and uploading files with excessive size will only make it worse ;
- 5) Excessive file size will take a lot longer to load for people with slow internet ;
- 6) Excessive file size might make some old smartphones crash when opening the file ;
- 7) Excessive file size is bad for bandwidth and will slow down the server ;
- 8) Many of my images have been loaded more than 1 million times per file, if you multiply this number with excessive file size it would be a waste of bandwidth. Examples : 4M views in 4 years, 2.6M views in 1 year, 1.4M views in 1 year, 2.1M views in 1 year 2.3M views in 1 year, etc.
- 9) If there was a policy of only accepting only loseless uploads we would only be uploading PNG format, which is not the case here and is on the contrary to be avoided.
- Best regards, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that this is the case and also every photographer should be free to edit their photos as they see fit, and we enter a grey area where it can be a decision of the photographer or a technical error according to some. Destructive editing does not only involve compression of JPGs, but also very strong noise reduction or sharpness filters, or saturation or color changes that were not real (except for black and white images or specific cases). I come from Venezuela, a country with very limited internet access where almost no one can see our work even with the highest compressions, but should we limit ourselves in an attempt to be inclusive?, This is just a image, imagine all the bandwidth that is spent on watching streaming videos, which is becoming more common every day. IMHO As a general rule, I always suggest uploading the best possible version of your work, because the quality in which you share it today will be how it’s remembered tomorrow. If someone prefers a smaller version, there are several size options available on the image description page, but that should not be your limitation when creating. Don’t set up barriers that others can easily overcome. Show your art in all its splendor and detail. You might think now that it’s enough to upload an optimized or more modest version, but I assure you, over time, you’ll regret it. Technology and quality standards advance quickly. The best way to contribute your work to humanity is by sharing it in the highest quality possible. In the end, it’s a matter of respecting your own creation and those who will enjoy it Wilfredor (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Elaborate further. Wolverine XI 13:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Fine, nice colors. --Mile (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
Info created by FBilula - uploaded by FBilula - nominated by FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- FBilula (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Good composition, but DoF too small. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 09:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Good lighting and composition. The leading (meandering) line of the path towards the steep hill in the background adds invokes, to me at least, a parallel to the myth of Sisyphus. A compelling image --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 17:44:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Nice, considering it was taken from a cell phone. ★ 17:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Agree with ★. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Really nice composition, but details looks flat (due to taking with a cell phone) --XRay 💬 09:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral The composition is very nice, but I agree with XRay about the level of detail and the resolution is rather small in this day and age. BigDom (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 10.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2024 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose You present an impressive collection of beautiful butterfly images here but in this case I think the detail is not at FP level. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment IQ is fine, but position and left crop - more space. --Mile (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Spain
Info View of the Alcázar of Segovia during sunrise, Segovia, Castile and León, Spain. The UNESCO World Heritage Site dates from the 12th century and has been home to twenty-two kings. The Alcazar of Segovia has made its mark on cinema and popular culture. It was used by Orson Welles in the film "Chimes at Midnight" and served as inspiration for Cinderella castle in the Walt Disney movie and also in the Disneyworld sites. It's one of the most renowed medieval castles in the world and one of the most visited landmarks in Spain. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Not the best perspective, IMO. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Good interplay of light, clouds and the building.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose the composition feels aimless. The lighting makes the castle appear flat Henrysz (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting to see a different perspective of a much-photographed building, but the lighting here isn't really working for me, sorry. I agree with Henrysz regarding the 'flat'ness. BigDom (talk) 02:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support I am fine. Would say fort is very good and sharp. I wish other around could be similar sharp. Those 2-3 storks on trees solved. --Mile (talk) 09:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support I like the light and the perspective/angle. ★ 22:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravenna - Basilica di Sant'Apollinare in Classe - Vista esterna - 2024-09-13 23-38-55 001.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 22:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, located in Ravenna, is truly a jewel surrounded by greenery. Internally, the mosaic of the apse also depicts Sant'Apollinare in a lush green lawn, surrounded by trees, flowers and animals, creating an atmosphere of peace and serenity. This scenario symbolizes heaven and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
* -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support
Support I find both versions attractive, but I personally like this one better. The group of sculptures on the left adds to the overall appeal of the scene. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are right. I decided to upload a new version in order to preserve the full scenery. I will correlate the two images as other version. I also really like this image, but I decided to opt for the alternative image because the depiction being too broad becomes difficult to interpret and perhaps even distracting. Terragio67 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version
[edit]Info I decided to crop the left part of the image above to give centrality and the right importance to the basilica immersed in the greenery of nature, trying in the same way to represent an atmosphere of peace and serenity, similar to the internal mosaic of the apse where the tone of the colors resemble each other. This scenario symbolizes paradise and eternal life, making the basilica a place of great beauty and spirituality. Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support For me this crop is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support, clearly better than the original crop. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support :-) --XRay 💬 08:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Joalpe (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
SupportGood geometrical projection. It's hilarious for me, that "Gaming" exists as a village :). Many older Bavarians may refer to this name than for the term "Gaming" of playing video games --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin, but the framing is a bit too large in my view Still better too large than too tight :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 12:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose composition feels unbalanced Henrysz (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Looks too distorted and unnatural in my eyes, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment It was in his house, it was "normally" - in dzezva. Sand perhaps in desert, on dry camels waste. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing puddling position of Graphium antiphates (Cramer, 1775) - Five-bar Swordtail WLB MG 2022.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Ulrichsberg Panorama SSO 20240704.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas and well handled. Panorama-stitching can be very tough, but this result is top tier. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Plac Wilsona Warsaw 2022 aerial.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)
[edit]Fri 13 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Tue 17 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Wed 18 Sep → Mon 23 Sep
タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)
[edit]Sun 08 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Mon 09 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Tue 10 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Wed 11 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Sun 22 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Mon 23 Sep Sat 14 Sep → Tue 24 Sep Sun 15 Sep → Wed 25 Sep Mon 16 Sep → Thu 26 Sep Tue 17 Sep → Fri 27 Sep Wed 18 Sep → Sat 28 Sep