Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
13 August 2024
15 August 2024
Deletion requests on 14 August 2024

August 14

[edit]

File:Tượng đài chủ tịch hồ chí minh.png

[edit]

COM:FOP Vietnam says "Not OK for new uploads from 1 January 2023 onwards", this file is uploaded in Feb. 2024, to indicate a statue located since 2009, any permissions available? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Lascorpion (talk · contribs)

[edit]

i dont think any of these flags are too simple for copyright, or too old, or uploader's own works.

RZuo (talk) 06:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Заслуженный учитель школы РСФСР.jpg

[edit]

Source is not specified, no evidence this is a free licensed photo of 3d object (even if the object itself is PD). Quick1984 (talk) 08:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Source parameter says "Own processing" (i.e. self-edited). It doesn't quite look like a photo, but like a derivate work. The following look more like photos and might have been used as source images for the derivate work: File:Медаль Заслуженного учителя школы РСФСР.jpg and File:Honored School Teacher of the RSFSR.png. The colors of the leaf on the medal and the Russian ribbon bar are different / incorrect in the processed version. Nakonana (talk) 01:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also think that the original images were of higher quality (and obviously didn't have the incorrect colors). The only reason why the processed version is so much in use, is that the uploader changed the image of the Russian template for this reward [1] and the image in the wiki data item [2]. Nakonana (talk) 01:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Medals of Ministry of Transport (Russia)

[edit]

These awards are not State's but Departmental (ведомственные) ones, so PD-RU-exempt is not applicable.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Exterior of Parc des Princes

[edit]

The stadium was completed in 1972 by Roger Taillibert (1926–2019). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2090.

A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:40 let polyota Gagarina.jpg

[edit]

This award is not State's but Departmental (ведомственные) one, so PD-RU-exempt is not applicable. Quick1984 (talk) 08:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:For distinguished military service (The Russian Federation FAGCI)

[edit]

These awards are not State's but Departmental (ведомственные) ones, so PD-RU-exempt is not applicable.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:The Russian Federation Investigative Committee medals

[edit]

These awards are not State's but Departmental (ведомственные) ones, so PD-RU-exempt is not applicable.

Quick1984 (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Подпись Шишкина АА.png

[edit]

Re-uploaded after deletion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shishkin signature.svg. Quick1984 (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Bradby Shield (2024).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of non free content? Yann (talk) 09:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the nominator's assessment of the image. I previously nominated an older version, uploaded by me, for speedy deletion to declutter the Wikimedia Commons. A newer image from 2024 was subsequently uploaded for use in the associated Wikipedia article. However, the nominator has now deemed the current image to be unsuitable for hosting and has nominated it for deletion. I believe this decision is unfounded and should be reversed. PaintMeASunrise (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We need a formal written permission for a free license from the trophy copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 11:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator's assertion is wrong, the claim is unfounded, and based on incorrect assumptions. PaintMeASunrise (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PaintMeASunrise: This is Commons policy. Yann (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator's interpretation of the relevant guidelines is flawed and biased. Applying this interpretation consistently would necessitate the deletion of numerous other images on the platform, including those within personal galleries. This inconsistency highlights the arbitrary nature of the current deletion nomination, which should be reversed. PaintMeASunrise (talk) 02:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Ike damage photos

[edit]

These three files originate on this page of the US National Weather Service. However, the creator of each of these images is ambiguous because they (and all the other hurricane damage photos on the page) are all collectively attributed "photos courtesy of NWS HGX and Galveston County OEM".

"NWS HGX" is the National Weather Services' Houston/Galveston regional office. Its employees are employees of the US federal government. As such, any works created by them in the course of their duties are ineligible for copyright and are in the public domain.

"Galveston County OEM" is the Office of Emergency Management for Galveston County. Its employees are employees of Galveston County. Works of county governments in Texas are eligible for copyright (Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. § 270.009) and there is no presumption that they are automatically in the public domain.[3]

Beyond that, if any of these images were created by employees of Galveston County, we have no evidence of permission that any copyright that might have existed over them was ever transferred away to put the images in the public domain.

At different times, various regional offices of the National Weather Service have held contests or other public outreach exercises that have made release into the public domain a condition of participation. However, there is no evidence that connects any of these three images with any one of those initiatives.

According to the National Weather Service disclaimer linked at the bottom of the webpage, "The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise." No particular form for such a notation is specified or required in the disclaimer, and a wide range of attribution styles is observed on past and present weather.gov pages. These range from very explicit, formal notices with the copyright (©) symbol, through to "Courtesy of ..." and "Photo by ..." notations.

Given that weather.gov pages have hosted thousands of third-party images of a period of over 20 years and across over 100 regional offices, no special significance can be attached to the fact that not all of these notations share the same wording or format. Indeed, it would be extraordinary if they did.

Taken together, all of the above creates significant doubt under the precautionry principle as to whether any of these three images are in the public domain.

I am not suggesting that any of these three images are necessarily protected by copyright; I'm saying that considering all the evidence together, we simply do not know whether they are or aren't, which means we must delete them. --Rlandmann (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Files uploaded by PaintMeASunrise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of non free content?

Yann (talk) 10:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree with the nominator's decision to delete these images. The nominator has previously demonstrated an overly broad interpretation of deletion criteria in a related case. Without providing specific and valid reasons for the current deletion nomination, I believe this action is arbitrary and should be reversed. PaintMeASunrise (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We need a formal written permission for a free license from the trophy copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 11:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator's assertion is wrong, the claim is unfounded, and based on incorrect assumptions. PaintMeASunrise (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PaintMeASunrise: This is Commons policy. Yann (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator's interpretation of the relevant guidelines is flawed and biased. Applying this interpretation consistently would necessitate the deletion of numerous other images on the platform, including those within personal galleries. This inconsistency highlights the arbitrary nature of the current deletion nomination, which should be reversed. PaintMeASunrise (talk) 02:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That there are also other files which should be deleted is not an argument not to delete these files. --Rosenzweig τ 09:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator's subjective interpretation of the guidelines is inconsistent with the platform's broader acceptance of similar content. This selective enforcement undermines the integrity of the deletion process and raises concerns about the nominator's impartiality PaintMeASunrise (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revolutionary Socialism Chile CWI logo one.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by CFA as Logo (help=off) Yann (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The logo of the party Revolutionary Socialism wasn't already on Wikipedia, it is important to attach it on to a new article about the party so the public have access to its existence. The image is mine because I was asked to make one, since I am connected to the party and I edited the image so it would be a clear image. Jamesation (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jamesation, that logo appears to be above COM:TOO Chile. I'd suggest uploading it locally to Wikipedia in a way in keeping with their fair use policy. Commons does not allow fair use at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:금샘고 교표.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Aspere as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|source=[4] (If it's not displayed, copy the URL itself into address bar) Yann (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Triangle Bus 1.png

[edit]

Uploaded this file and was unjustly blocked from the site afterwards. Can this file please be removed as i no longer wish for it to be used. 2.27.252.240 19:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: rather low quality but closed as kept per others in series of nominations by anon. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triangle Bus 1.png

[edit]

"Uploaded this file and was unjustly blocked from the site afterwards. Can this file please be removed as i no longer wish for it to be used." Renominated because the person who marked it as kept thinks that I have not been blocked. Here is a link to the page which shows that I have been blocked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GarryHenderson6 2.27.248.176 11:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's immaterial that you've been blocked. The only question is whether you shot this photo. Did you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Lindegreen

[edit]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Karl Lindegre(e)n, who died in 1970. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2041.

Rosenzweig τ 12:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Twistringen

[edit]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Georg Karl Rohde, who died in 1959. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2030.

Rosenzweig τ 12:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:HK MK 金甲韓國料理 Gold Beetle Korean Restaurant cold soft drink canned 康師傅 Dr Kon iced red tea April 2017 IX1.jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK MK 金甲韓國料理 Gold Beetle Korean Restaurant cold soft drink Health Works April 2017 IX1.jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Warin i. M.

[edit]

Per his EB signature, these German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Erich Bentrup, who died in 1968. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2039.

Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:HK SKW 筲箕灣 Shau Kei Wan MTR Station concourse March 2021 SS2.jpg

[edit]

Non-free 2D works in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 12:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK 觀塘 Kwun Tong APM mall shop 三聯書店 JP Books November 2018 SSG bookstore 01.jpg

[edit]

Non-free 3D works in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 12:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - COM:DM applies ~TheImaCow (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Trude Graef

[edit]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Trude Graef, who died in 1982. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2053.

Rosenzweig τ 12:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Svrotal Ladder.jpg

[edit]

Datei mit Schreibfehler! Minimaxnms (talk) 13:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Wikipe-tan undies.png

[edit]

Educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 13:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep there’s an unwritten consensus that project related fanart doesn’t need to be “educational”. In any case it’s not out of scope: I mainly uploaded it thinking it could be used as a base for people to draw outfits on, but it could also illustrate fan service or a particular style of sports bra I’m not sure we have many images of. How is this any different than any other image of Wikipe-tan? Dronebogus (talk) 13:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: personal "art", COM:WEBHOST, and not educational. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@P199: once again, how is this any different than any other image of Wikipe-tan? Especially ones that are objectively much worse like File:Wikipe-tan ウィキペたん.png? Dronebogus (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Masoli .jpg

[edit]

rediger texte 2001:8003:2626:5E01:A530:6046:F0E6:3274 13:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipe-tan Minna no Kisakae bikini alt.png

[edit]

Educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 13:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep there’s an unwritten consensus that project related fanart doesn’t need to be “educational”, and in any case it’s a perfectly good illustration of w:fan service. How is this any different than any other image of Wikipe-tan? Dronebogus (talk) 13:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does the "unwritten consensus" override the policy of COM:SCOPE? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 21:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The unwritten consensus would seem to imply it’s not particularly relevant here, similar to user page decorations. In any case I gave examples of how this is in scope, as well as examples of similar files being COM:INUSE Dronebogus (talk) 21:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there is any such unwritten consensus. I think COM:SCOPE should apply here, just as it would to any other image. How is this image educational? This image (the one we are discussing) is not in use. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 21:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read my very first comment? I said “it’s a perfectly good illustration of w:fan service.” Dronebogus (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: personal "art", COM:WEBHOST, and not educational. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@P199: Why is this somehow out of scope when a nearly identical file is in use on three different Wikipedias? Dronebogus (talk) 19:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Fort Leonard Wood EF3 tornado 31 Dec 2010.jpg

[edit]

This file originates on this page of the US National Weather Service. However, the creator of the image is ambiguous because it (and all the other storm damage photos on the page) are all collectively attributed "These photos are provided by National Weather Service storm surveys, as well as from some of our media partners. Many thanks to those who provided pictures following the event". None of these media partners or any other third party are specifically named, and no distinction is made between images created by National Weather Service personnel and those sourced from third parties. It was taken on December 31, 2010 in Missouri.

The same photo appears on pages 4 and 123 of the NOAA publication Storm Data, Volume 52, number 12 (December 2010) (available on demand from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/sd/sd.html ) again without specific attribution.

As employees of the US federal government, any works created by NWS employees in the course of their duties are ineligible for copyright and are in the public domain. (And because this photo was taken on a US Army base, Fort Leonard Wood, noting here that the same would apply if the anonymous photographer were a member of the Army, on-duty)

Other than that, images created in the United States by "media partners" and most other third parties are generally protected by copyright.

Without knowing at least who took this photo, we cannot know its copyright status. And if it were ever under copyright, we have no evidence of permission that this copyright was ever transferred away to put the image in the public domain.

At different times, various regional offices of the National Weather Service have held contests or other public outreach exercises that have made release into the public domain a condition of participation. However, there is no evidence that connects this image with any one of those initiatives.

According to the National Weather Service disclaimer linked at the bottom of the webpage, "The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise." No particular form for such a notation is specified or required in the disclaimer, and a wide range of attribution styles is observed on past and present weather.gov pages. These range from very explicit, formal notices with the copyright (©) symbol, through to "Courtesy of ..." and "Photo by ..." notations.

Given that weather.gov pages have hosted thousands of third-party images of a period of over 20 years and across over 100 regional offices, no special significance can be attached to the fact that not all of these notations share the same wording or format. Indeed, it would be extraordinary if they did.

Taken together, all of the above creates significant doubt under the precautionary principle as to whether this image is in the public domain.

I am not suggesting that it is necessarily protected by copyright; I'm saying that considering all the evidence together, we simply do not know whether it is or isn't, which means we must delete it. Rlandmann (talk) 13:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.
  •  Keep — Per the National Weather Service disclaimer linked at the bottom of the webpage, "The information on National Weather Service Web servers and Web sites is in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public." There is no indications of this image being “specifically annotated otherwise”. For the clause of “specifically annotated otherwise”, NWS either allows the user to add a copyright “©” watermark to the image {as seen in this image, hosted on this NWS webpage} or by directly adding a copyright statement using “©” {as seen on this NWS webpage: difference between the “Tornado Photos” and “Damage” tabs}. That disclaimer is linked at the bottom of all three of the NWS webpages linked above (this image’s webpage + 2 I used as examples). To me, “specifically annotated otherwise” indicates a direct copyright (©) statement or watermark. For that reason, I support keeping this image in the public domain. Noting I am not replying to comments for my Keep !vote, as I have clearly stated why it should be kept and I am leaving it at that. This image is in the public domain, with no evidence to say otherwise. WeatherWriter (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Weak delete per @Rlandmann. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Precautionary principle applies I think. If it turns out to actually be in the public domain or freely licensed; we can always request that it be undeleted. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "These photos are provided by National Weather Service storm surveys, as well as from some of our media partners. Many thanks to those who provided pictures following the event" is a very specific annotation that some of the images on that page were not created by the federal employees who work at the NWS -- unfortunately, they just don't tell us which images are which. This creates the significant doubt that requires us to delete this image.
    Also, by now, you know full well that we've seen copyrighted images on NWS and NOAA websites with all kinds of attribution notations, not just the formal ones that you insist that they must use. They don't have to notate somebody else's ownership of the file in any specific way, let alone the one you prescribe that they must, nor do they claim they will use any particular form of attribution . That strange notion is something that User:Runningonbrains pulled out of thin air 15 years ago. There's no reason to treat their invention as carved in stone, especially when the NWS themselves say no such thing. -- Rlandmann (talk) 21:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per PRP according to currently available information. Anyone should feel free (as always) to reach out to the NWS office in question to determine the original author and confirm copyright status with the original author specifically. Berchanhimez (talk) 23:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 06:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per WeatherWriter. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 23:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lapide a ricordo della elevazione alla dignità di basilica minore della chiesa di Sant'Antonio da Padova in Bologna da parte di Papa Pio XII nel 1939.jpg

[edit]

nome sbagliato Sofocle77 (talk) 13:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Junod avec Sidney Brown au départ pour Addis-Abeba.jpg

[edit]

misattributed and incorrectly dated (compare with File:Marcel Junod-4.jpg). filename may refer to File:Marcel_Junod-3.jpg Enhancing999 (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Different (and arguably better) print of File:Marcel Junod-4.jpg. Info & filename should be corrected, should be kept, the two should refer to each other with {{Other version}}. - Jmabel ! talk 19:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Naumburg (Saale)

[edit]

The reverse sides of these German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Walter Hege, who died in 1955. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2026.

Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Marcel Junod 2024.jpg

[edit]

Misattributed, compare with File:Marcel_Junod-3.jpg Enhancing999 (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Junod pendant la guerre civile en Espagne.jpg

[edit]

misdescribed and misattributed comparing to FIle:Marcel Junod-6.jpg and File:Marcel Junod-4.jpg. --- . Enhancing999 (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-Hazem Saudi FC Logo.png

[edit]

There is no free distribution of FC logos. English Wikipedia uses this file with restrictions. Nurtenge (talk) 14:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nikolas781 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:DEMINIMIS, and per COM:FOP Russia File:Moscow City Duma elections, 2024 poster (Плакат посвещённый выборам в МГД 2024).jpg is artwork and should be deleted.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Все агитационные плакаты для выборов в Московскую городскую думу находились в общественном месте. Nikolas781 (talk) 12:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Все агитационные плакаты для выборов в Московскую городскую думу находились в общественном месте. Nikolas781 (обсуждение) 12:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
All propaganda posters for the elections to the Moscow City Duma were in a public place.
Nikolas781 (talk) 12:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pete Delkus.jpg

[edit]

In the net since at least 2016. 186.174.147.166 18:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irisbus Citelis 12 n°5243 (RATP - Ligne 110) - (Joinville-le-Pont RER) - (Joinville-le-Pont, FR94) - 14-08-2024 4.jpg

[edit]

The depicted advertisement on the back of the bus is IMO above COM:TOO and hardly de minimis. In addition, France has no freedom-of-panorama exception. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Censoring the advertisement and delete the oldest version showing the advertissement is still possible? Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 17:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. The advertisement-part could either be blurred (making it unreadable) or blanked-out (ideally in grey). --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have cropped these files (see below) instead, I hope that all the files will be kept (expected the oldest versions showing the advertissements who will be deleted). For my oponion:
  •  Keep: Cropped versions only.
  •  Delete: Previous versions showing advertissements.
Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 20:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Next time I will know your idea, blurring or blanked-out the ad. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 20:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Other solution, cropped these files to hide the advertissement. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

File:Caboclo Mestiço (Fotografia de Filipe Nires).jpg

[edit]

Há alguns anos, cometi o erro de tentar publicar um artigo no wikipedia, sem saber especificamente o que eu estava fazendo. Fui bloqueado e reconheço meu erro. Contudo, na tentativa malfadada, fiz upload dessa imagem, a qual hoje eu desejo deletar. É a minha própria imagem, ao lado de meus dois amigos da banda Caboclo Mestiço. Desejo excluir. Deletar. Agradeço antecipadamente. Caboclo Mestiço (talk) 19:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Info per policy, deletion just on uploader request is possible up to 7 days after upload; a valid deletion reason needed. 89.64.20.142 20:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/08/14&oldid=924128198"