Commons:Deletion requests/2024/08/27

26 August 2024

28 August 2024

Deletion requests on 27 August 2024

August 27

File:資深媒體人于美人.JPG

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as no permission (No permission since). That tag seems very unclear here. Is it questioning the claim of own work? If not, the template is just plain wrong. If so, they ought to be explicit about why they question it. This file has been on Commons over a decade. That said, uploader has no other uploads, and this looks like a possible video screenshot. But "no permission since" probably should not be used on a picture uploaded more than 10 years ago. Jmabel ! talk 00:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris Saint-Germain Patch on Counterfeit T-Shirt (13888668236).jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:PSG FC logo.jpg, the threshold of originality is too low in France. Günther Frager (talk) 00:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:營造法式

Copyrighted books with wrong filenames

沈澄心 ✉ 01:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner of West Bengal.svg

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Emblem_of_West_Bengal, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of the Government of West Bengal.svg, and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-10#File:Emblem_of_West_Bengal.svg. Günther Frager (talk) 02:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esther Bruton and Victor Arnautoff 1936.jpg

I received permission from SF librarian. But I have noticed that another file from is being deleted (File:Esther Bruton and Victor Arnautoff (1936).jpg) with similar case. Puncinus (talk) 02:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can contact COM:VRT to get help on what permission you need. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bednarski pantera zolnierz victoria.jpg

Even though I made this picture myself, there is art by K. Bednarski here which may be copyrighted (solder and pink partner). Puncinus (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Those works could be cropped out and left the sculptor, which is still in scope. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azazel 11 polish.jpg

it is not a picture, so perhaps it is copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify why you think the applied license doesn't hold. That license tag says nothing about the kind of work that is (or rather is not) under copyright. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gimnazjum im. T. Reytana in Warsaw (Polish Declarations of Admiration and Friendship for the United States).JPG

it is not a picture so perhaps it is copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this not a picture? PaterMcFly (talk) 07:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azazel znakrg26folder249.JPG

it is not a picture, so perhaps it is copyrighted Puncinus (talk) 02:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? That is obviously a picture. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023年积石山县地震的地震信息与人口密度.jpg

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is a CC-BY-4.0 statement in the terms of the linked website. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infosys metro station.jpg

Low resolution image without metadata. Unlikely to be uploader's own work. 2405:201:D002:319D:89BD:B5E5:9C72:A4D8 05:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Small size and missing EXIF data" is expressly cited on the COM:Deletion requests page as "not a deletion reason by itself". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FraggleRockMuseumPhoto.jpg

Per COM:TOYS. 0x0a (talk) 07:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a toy, its a photo from the Fraggle exhibit at the Center for Puppetry of Arts in Atlanta Georgia. July 2024. IntrepidReason (talk) 07:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the details from that link. 0x0a (talk) 07:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IntrepidReason (talk · contribs)

There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art in the U.S. (see COM:FOP US for details).

0x0a (talk) 07:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheragee Art Show 2 (01).jpg

And also:

File:Cheragee Art Show 2 (2).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Bangladesh A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was part of a street art installation, with all the artworks displayed in public spaces. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but such kinds of artwork is categorized as "graphic works", which is not covered by Bangladeshi FOP (similar to the British FOP as Bangladesh is a former colony of UK). --A1Cafel (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Martin-Luther-Kirche (Aufenau)

copyvio; artworks 1965/1971; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 08:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a problem with the windows, as these are normal, cheaply manufactured industrial windows that were not designed by an artist. There are therefore no works of art on the windows, just a colourful variety that should allow a beautiful incidence of light. I took the pictures myself in recent years when I played the organ in Aufenau. FauleBirne 007 (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Were the compositions that used the glass not sketched by an artist prior to the installation of the glass? Surely, someone selected the shapes, as they are not random. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kod B taken on 2022-11-06

These files were allegedly all taken on 6 November 2022. This is highly improbable as one picture is taken in Japan, another one in Turkey, and a third one in Madagascar. Authorship and license information are therefore suspicious. No Exif data either. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptic-waveform

These files above were sent to me by the athlete herself for uploading. She took her photos with her smartphone during her various international competitions. Now if you notice any anomalies, please let me know. Kod B (talk) 09:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When you upload files on Commons through the Upload Wizard, you need to select whether the files are your own work, or somebody else's work. For these files you selected that they were your own work, when they actually aren't. In this case date, author, source, and permission information on these files are wrong. This need to be fixed for these files to stay on Commons. Specifically the author(s) of these pictures need to consent to releasing them under a license compatible with Commons. See Commons:Email templates/Consent. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand ! Kod B (talk) 13:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kod B: You must understand that files "sent to [you]" doesn't mean that the files became your owns. They remain the properties of their respective copyright owners, and we need a formal written for a free license from them for the files to be accepted on Commons.

Vous devez comprendre que les fichiers « envoyés à [vous] » ne signifient pas que les fichiers deviennent les vôtres. Ils restent la propriété de leurs propriétaires respectifs, et nous avons besoin d'une autorisation écrite formelle de leur part pour une licence libre pour que les fichiers soient acceptés sur Commons. Yann (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024091310007818 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rus Convert Raizman YJ-2003 (2).jpg

Derrivated from the Russian postal card which is PD. The whole postcard with stamps is free from copyright, but the painting is not. For example see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oleg Dahl Postal card Russia 2016cr.jpg FlorianH76 (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FlorianH76, the most complete list of cropped postal covers you can find at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (cropped postal covers) (dozens of them are still present). Quick1984 (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a retaliation request after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victims of the 1993 events in Moscow 2.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victims of the 1993 events in Moscow 1.png. Yann (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Beyond Walls - Parc des Bastions

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence)

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other works by Saype are on Commons. Where is the difference? MHM (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama clearly says "Works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures or chalk paintings on streets, are nevertheless considered permanent." PaterMcFly (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saype (Guillaume Legros) in 2019.png

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence) Martin Sg. (talk) 10:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martin, I will just question who you believe the copyright belongs to, which I think should form a major part of this discussion. If the copyright belongs to Saype, then permission should be sought from him to allow the image to be shown? If the copyright belongs to Air Production, who made the video, they have already agreed to publish under CC-BY-3.0 Unported license. If the image belongs to the local governing administration of Estavayer-le-Lac Suisse, or to the Swiss government, or the people of Switzerland, then I guess you will be correct. But we need to establish whom. Thank you. James Kevin McMahon (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC) KEEP[reply]

Hi James Kevin. The holder of copyright, imho, is the creator of the depicted artwork, i.e. Saype. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Mart Sg. I thought that rule only applies in France, not in Switzerland. See Freedom of panorama, it does not seem to apply to Switzerland.James Kevin McMahon (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama clearly says "Works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures or chalk paintings on streets, are nevertheless considered permanent." PaterMcFly (talk) 08:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Saype

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama (due to non-permanence)

Martin Sg. (talk) 10:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich halte deine Argumentation nicht für stichhaltig. Das Grasgemälde wird/wurde nicht entfernt. Es bleibt an Ort und Stelle. Es ist allein die Natur, welche das Gemälde zum Verschwinden bringt. Auch schnell zerfallende Werke können im Sinne des Gesetzes «permanent» sein und fallen folglich unter die Panoramafreiheit. Eis-, Sand-, Schneeskulpturen und Strassenmalerei halten selten mehr als einige Tage oder Wochen. Wenn sie während ihrer natürlichen Haltbarkeit an einem öffentlichen Ort bleiben, werden sie als «permanent» angesehen und fallen unter die Panoramafreiheit. Die zur Diskussion stehenden Bilder mit dem Titel Bridges? sind öffentlich zugänglich und von öffentlichen Standpunkten (vor allem von der Poyabrücke File:SAYPE_Bridges_2024_Fribourg_01.jpg) aus aufgenommen. Die übrigen Fotos von Bridges? zeigen die Grasmalerei ausserdem nicht in einer wirksamen Perspektive. Das Kunstwerk kann auch als Beiwerk zur Aufnahme der Poyabrücke bzw. der Landschaft gesehen werden. Diese Gründe sprechen gegen einen Löschantrag. -- Matutinho 18:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Ich stimme Matutinho zu, diese Werke werden durch natürliche Ursachen vergehen, nicht durch eine geplante Zeit, nach der sie entfernt werden. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Switzerland#Freedom_of_panorama clearly says "Works whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures or chalk paintings on streets, are nevertheless considered permanent." PaterMcFly (talk) 08:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (possibly depending on the vantage point?). I agree with Matutinho and PaterMcFly that in Switzerland, freedom of panorama for non-permanent works "whose lifetime is restricted by natural conditions, such as ice sculptures" - or the grass paintings shown here - is applicable. This is backed up by the cited legal commentary literature Barrelet/Egloff, Das neue Urheberrecht, 4th ed. (2020), Art. 27 (5) (snow and ice sculptures); Macciacchini/Oertli, Handkommentar Urheberrechtsgesetz, 2nd ed. (2012), Art. 27 (9) (chalk paintings on streets or the sculpture ‚A WAY‘ by Simone Zaugg that was made of sugar); Hilty, Urheberrecht, 2nd ed. (2020), para 490 (chalk paintings). However, these images ware taken from an elevated point of view, some possibly from the air, and that could be an issue. In Switzerland the work must be "in a place accessible to the public", but it's not entirely clear to me whether the photograph must also be taken from such a place. In Germany, FoP is only applicable if the photographer takes the photo from a public place without technical help - so, images taken from a ladder or with a drone wouldn't fall under FoP in Germany. But I don't see such an explicit restriction for Switzerland, so I'm still leaning towards keep for all images. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: For example, File:SAYPE Bridges 2024 Fribourg 05.jpg seems to be taken from a presumably publicly accessible hill. This photo would be fine in any case. File:Saype Artichoke (small).png on the other hand is, as per the description, "a snapshot of the video posted on Youtube by Air production" (under CC-BY), and I think - also from the name "Air production" - that it is an air/drone photo. As said above, I'm not quite sure that FoP is applicable in this case. Gestumblindi (talk) 08:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PPS: Just to make it clear, as it may not be that obvious from the three-dimensional looking File:Saype Artichoke (small).png: All these are paintings on grass that are made to look like giant 3D sculptures when viewed from a certain angle. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to all participants in the discussion. Below I talk about the photos of Saype's work in Fribourg (not Antichoke). I am the photographer of these photos: The picture c:File:SAYPE Bridges 2024 Fribourg 01.jpg is taken from the publicly accessible Poya Bridge noted in the description. The other pictures of this work are taken from the following locations (noted in the description and camera position): I use the numbering in the filename before the extension: 02 taken from the publicly accessible L'Atelier (formerly Gutenberg Museum), where an exhibition of Saype's works was held, 03 and 04 taken from the accessible tower of St Nicholas Cathedral, 05 taken from a public path leading over the so called Stadtberg (and through a nationally important dry meadow) in Les Neigles. So I come to the conclusion that these photos fall under the freedom of panorama. --Matutinho 09:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Insanity (Dave Song).ogg

why does it have structured data "Friday Night Funkin'"? Is it CCBY? Prototyperspective (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to the other uploads by the user. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kuala Lumpur Photowalk by Ralffralff

The name is inappropriate since Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) is located in Selangor. Most of the photographs in the category focuses in KLIA only. I will create this category again if I got the chance to travel around the city of Kuala Lumpur in the future. Thanks! Ralffralff (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChuvashiaAirlinesLogo.png

My old work, when I did not know the rules of Wikimedia Commons. Deriative work of protected by copyright aircraft livery (File:Tupolev Tu-134A-3, Chuvashiya Airlines AN0739072.jpg). Горизонт событий (talk) 11:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tilman Woertz (talk · contribs)

All credited to University Tubingen in exif, needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024083010010417 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Miniatur Wunderland

Sorry, but it's still protected by copyright. There is no freedom pf panorama for building interiors in Germany

File:Hamburg Herbertstrasse (2924211804).jpg

Lukas Beck (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:May 4, 2022 Seminole, Oklahoma Tornado.jpg

This is a screenshot from news footage protected by copyright. The original video can be found here and this screenshot is from around the 0:24 mark.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 11:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Delete per precautionary principle. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 11:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sounding penis.jpg

Com:Penis and must have been shared in some strange social medium, per Exif. 186.172.107.161 12:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Napster

These files were all nominated for deletion individually by Kigsz. The rationale was the same for each file: This seems like a copyrighted logotype. Kigsz (talk) 07:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC). I think it ought be better if they all appear in a mass request since they are so similar.[reply]

Jonteemil (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Napster, not really being copyright protection advocates, would unlikely copyright their logo. We do need proof of a free license however, otherwise we have to consider the files as copyvios, eventhough I doubt that they are. Jonteemil (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hibiscus Camp at Consocep Road, Tigaon, Camarines Sur.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope (non-personal similar views available, such as File:Consucep.jpg). P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malaysian Learner's Driving Licence, front.png

The work is a derivative of a government work. Permission is also required for the original work. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malaysian Vocational Licence.jpg

The work is a derivative of a government work. Permission is also required for the original work. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malaysian Probationary Driving Licence, front.png

The work is a derivative of a government work. Permission is also required for the original work. FactFindersEnigma (talk) 15:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tun Hussein Onn (MY 3rd PM).jpg

The date "presumably before 1963" is inaccurate. He became an MP in 1971, became a deputy PM in 1973, and later PM in 1976. This appears to be an official portrait after entering politics. Since COM:Malaysia required photo to be published before 1962, otherwise they are copyrighted in both USA and Malaysia, this photo is possibly copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree, I hope it can be deleted quickly. Baginda 480 (talk) 03:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seven days have passed, it's time to delete it! Baginda 480 (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 2001:D08:E6:D35B:286C:C77B:3FCC:7EFB 13:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JanekHonza.jpg

User clams a copyrighted image as own work. The image is in fact a screenshot from a recent YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTuXsYBIXHE&t=61 — Marvin ^talk 16:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment edit warring. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should have mentioned that. The image is being used in what can be called edit warring. However I believe the copyright issue can be assessed separately from the article's issue. — Marvin ^talk 17:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I referred the article edit war to the Biographies of living persons Noticeboard on Wikipedia, I hope that will help resolve it. I still think it has no bearing on the copyright issue. — Marvin ^talk 18:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I also think the description should be removed if BLP applies to Commons as it basically states Janek is a homosexual, a claim not made in his Wikipedia article. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:الاختلافات النصية في إنجيل متى.png

صورة ليست لها أهمية Mohammed Qays (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مجيد ملوك السامرائي.jpg

Clearly not a 2024 photograph Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fos dr6.tiff

SDSS is not an agency under NASA, so this image should be copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lenten veils

I am afraid but the artworks depicted in these photos are protected by copyright, and freedom of panorama does not apply to them (for Austria, see COM:FOP Austria), which is why we have to delete the photos unless we receive a permission from the artists. --Gnom (talk) 16:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Consent to deletion. The Lenten veils are not permanently at this location (one of the ones pictured has been on display in our rectory for over 10 years, so their life-span is much years longer than they are displayed in the churches). Therefore, the conditions for freedom of panorama are not met. In addition, for the photos from Germany: there, freedom of panorama does not apply inside buildings. None of the Lenten veils have been permission by the respective artist. Quedel (talk) 16:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quedel: The half of these photos are made in Austria not in Germany ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 18:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Said nothing others? Quedel (talk) 19:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'OUSTAU en AUTOMNE.pdf

Redundant to File:Château de Lousteau, Gamarde-les-Bains, Landes, France.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

status of Hirata, Yukie in Kaizu, Gifu

COM:FOP Japan the contributor says that the statues was established in 1995.

eien20 (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is over COM:TOO Italy, compared to the logos that have been denied copyright protection. What cases have there been about label art in Italy? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowmore Islay Single Malt Scotch Whisky, 12 year, 750ml bottle..jpg

Label art is complex enough to be copyrighted: COM:PACKAGING Dreamyshade (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Consuelo Vanderbilt01.jpg

The image was overtaken by a better one PancoPinco (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darren Bark.jpg

The metadata give Copyright Giselle Haber Photography. Is the user the same person? Wouter (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Consuelo Vanderbilt1.jpg

The image was overtaken by a better one PancoPinco (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monstrous Marquee - Body Snatcher, The - RKO - St. Louis, MS - 2-14-1945 (black and white).jpg

File:Monstrous Marquee - Body Snatcher, The - RKO - St. Louis, MS - 2-14-1945.jpg

Without knowing the publication history of this historic photograph, we cannot say it is an anonymous work. Missing US license, but it could be PD by formalties if it was an RKO promotional photograph or a postcard photo. Abzeronow (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evacuees from Kiryat Shmona2.webp

It shouldn't be deleted, I've got the agreement unofficially but I'm waiting for the official confirmation Alaexis (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've initiated a regular deletion request in order to avoid speedy deletion. Alaexis (talk) 19:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pobrecitos! De repente unos adolescentes palestinos pueden tirarles piedras y ellos pueden quedar obligados a matarlos con las armas que andan llevando. No tengo problemas con judios comunes, pero hoy en dia los palestinos son como judios bajo Nazis en su propio pais... 186.175.242.15 20:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evacuees from Kiryat Shmona.jpg

It shouldn't be deleted, I've got the agreement unofficially but I'm waiting for the official confirmation. I'm initiating a regular deletion request in order to avoid speedy deletion. Alaexis (talk) 19:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20220421 img 7977 2 21b141edc9.jpg

Appears to be taken from https://store.didigallery.com/en/catalog/authors/braulov-sasha Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JP Tokyo 7-11 store 1984 11 CE Family Coll.jpg

Misidentified location (clearly not Tokyo based on the mix of Chinese and English writing), and Flickr description credits Reddit, so no evidence that the license is correct. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe Chinatown in Tokyo? There are almost a million Chinese in Japan since the Empire. We need someone to identify the license plate number on the minibus. Perhaps it is Hong Kong or Taiwan. Alexander One Rule (talk) 19:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexander One Rule There’s no Chinatown in Tokyo, and even in a Chinatown in Yokohama or Kobe, the traffic signs wouldn’t be a combination of English/Chinese. I’m guessing Hong Kong or Singapore based on the British English signage.

The more important issue is the license though. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 11:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:216A7261-aufgehellt edited.jpg

I'm finding it rather dubious to claim it as own work . A completely out-of-context image of a new kind of shopping cart, very similar to an image here, uploaded by a user who's only edits were to spam content related to this cart at an.wp, where I have taken the image out of use. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Formation of 22 Company, CASC from the Edmonton Bulletin - 11 May 1921.png

Unused text doc, hardly legible, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We house over 10,000 clipped news articles, almost none appear in articles, they are used for research. --RAN (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since when did we change the scope to host text-only images? --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good question, but some other admins seem to have suggested that Commons has done that for a long time, in spite of the contradiction to it in COM:SCOPE. Someone needs to change the wordings on that page to very clearly reflect actual practice by Commons admins. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Edalexanderjr (talk · contribs)

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused with no foreseeable educational use — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JP Tokyo 1984 CE Family Coll 1.jpg

Flickr description says Slides from the CE Family Collection via a generous Redditor, no evidence that the license is correct, no author information given Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an indication of the license type for Flickr. This license is clearly shown and there is nothing to suggest otherwise. Perhaps the photo was received as a gift with all rights to it. The nomination for removal comes from speculation rather than from an actual designated license. Alexander One Rule (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FoswithConch.jpg

Low-quality photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on user page of non-contributing user. Also added:

File:FosinWales.jpg

-- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Primeira edição.jpg

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. And not notable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto com bombeiros.jpg

Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/File:File:Julian20240827.jpg[reply]

File:Map-of-Summit-Co.-Ohio-1856-Library-of-Congress.pdf

unused "u-boat" JPEG 2000 version of Map of Summit Co., Ohio LOC 2012592394.tif as a PDF metafile, no need for this Ras67 (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koolihoone F.R.Kreutzwaldi tn 25.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the photo violates architect's copyright. Architect et:Herbert Johanson died in 1964 and the photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2035 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 21:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2em coupe du monde de vovinam-vietvodao.jpg

Unlikely to be a free pciture. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre de Conventions d'Oran.jpg

Likely copied from https://www.gcco.dz/dt_gallery/centre-de-conventions-doran/ and not own work. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ωνάσειο Καρδιοχειρουργικό Κέντρο.jpg

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 22:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HCFC-225cbCropped.jpg

This file is an exact copy of a newly uploaded version which has better format and is cropped North747 (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per uploader's request. Superseded by File:HCFC-225CB.png. Marbletan (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DEHPphthalate.jpg

This file is an exact copy of a newer version I have uploaded that is in better quality and cropped. North747 (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per uploader's request. Superseded by File:Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.png. Marbletan (talk) 13:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having a second look, based on DMacks' comment, I must have gotten them mixed up. The jpg version does appear to have more fine detail than the png. (Someone must have yoinked my eye. 😉) Marbletan (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:) DMacks (talk) 04:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pending clarification. User:North747, I don't see a cropping difference, but instead the nominated file is higher resolution and appears more in-focus at typical display sizes. Could you clarify the better-quality aspects you are intending? DMacks (talk) 06:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion, this nominated file should be kept as the file with the higher quality. In addition, File:Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.png should be deleted. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HCFC-225cb.jpg

This file is an exact copy of a newly uploaded version that is cropped better. This file is not in use anywhere. North747 (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per uploader's request. Superseded by File:HCFC-225CB.png. Marbletan (talk) 13:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I think the arrangement of text, colors, icons, and dialog boxes push it past TOO. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 02:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above, and I realize "they won't sue" isn't a usable argument on Commons, but this is a scammer's dialog box, so you think a scammer will sue someone for violating their copyright, all the more so when they presumably stole this from someone else, anyway? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The author is listed as Avast, not a scammer, so I don't think that part of the 'unusable' argument would even apply. WhoAteMyButter (talk) 01:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]