Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 1

[edit]

Author requested the deletion of said photo Shklalom (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose In use, in COM:SCOPE regardless, and out of the courtesy window for COM:CSD G7. If the subject wants a more current image of themselves in their article, they are free to release one under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "US Navy" public domain claim is phoney. This is a rather poor cropped reproduction of a painting by Thomas C Skinner (American, 1888-1955). Part of his signature is seen bottom right; in this larger size art print, published by the Mariners Museum, Newport News VA, it is there in full: https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/s-s-united-states-print-273-c-0564b87922

Judging by the caption on the reverse, the postcard image must have been published after July 1952 see: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/405071847497

Skinner was employed as staff artist at the Museum: https://www.marinersmuseum.org/2020/07/12480/ . Davidships (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024年8月30日 (金) 16:46‎ (UTC)に、User:Licsakさんにより、即時削除{{copyvio}}が貼られましたが、 投稿者である私User:Bcxfu75kは、削除対象では無いと考えています。 なぜなら、本画像は文字のみで構成されており、日本国法律の「著作権による保護の対象となるために必要とされるいわゆる創作性の基準を満たしていない(日本法においては、思想又は感情を創作的に表現したものではない)」であり、パブリックドメインに属すると考えます。 Template:PD-textlogoTemplate:TrademarkedTemplate:TOO-Japanもご参照ください。 Bcxfu75k (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

私もアサヒビールのロゴ裁判にて{{TOO-Japan}}および{{PD-textlogo}}の適用下である可能性を考えましたが、元の著作物から装飾を除去し、創作の閾値をあえて下げてフォントだけにしたものが二次的著作物の範疇になるかどうか、あえて削除議論にて問うたものです。第三者の意見を待ちましょう。
At the Asahi Breweries (Holdings) logo trial, I also considered the possibility that {{TOO-Japan}} and {{PD-textlogo}} were applied, but I deliberately asked in the deletion discussion whether removing decorations from the original work and deliberately lowering the creative threshold to only fonts would fall under the category of derivative works. Let's wait for the third party's opinion. Licsak (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete 依頼者票 (Vote of requester)。同様に装飾を除去して作成されたFile:虎に翼ロゴ.pngCOM:NETCOPYVIOで削除されました。おそらくこちらも同様かと。
The File:虎に翼ロゴ.png created by removing the decorations was also removed by COM:NETCOPYVIO. I think it's probably the same here.
--Licsak (talk) 06:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This radio station logo is highly unlikely to be a CC0-licensed own work; its depiction of the New York City skyline might put this over TOO. WCQuidditch 03:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This radio station logo, is the newest Logo of WEPN 98.7 FM. TJ 98.7Fm A Pop-Up station. You have also attached many of my images before and it hasn’t gone unnoticed… You also spammed my pages it has also gone unnoticed… I would like to point out I would like you to leave me alone. Thank you. As I do know the Wikipedia rules and follow them accordingly. Mikey551415 (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File shall not be deleted Mikey551415 (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio from https://roblox.fandom.com/wiki/Emergency_Hamburg_(group)/Emergency_Hamburg Hoyanova (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Simple text logo possibly below the threshold of originality - I'm not sure what jurisdiction would apply - but the subject (a Roblox minigame) seems unlikely to be notable. Omphalographer (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mikey551415 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Despite the uploader's assertions, these images relating to the Mr. Six mascot that has been used by various iterations of the Six Flags theme park chain, which appear to come from Six Flags advertisements, are highly unlikely to be either CC-licensed "own works" or in the public domain. The uploader has removed copyvio tags, so a discussion (even of the "going through the motions" type) seems necessitated.

WCQuidditch 06:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The are on a public domain and you can get mr six images anywhere. I am not sure why my images gotta be target Mikey551415 (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Public domain has a specific legal meaning. It does not mean "available to the public". Omphalographer (talk) 07:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by איש עיטי as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1994 outdoor bas-relief mural. No FoP in the US for sculpture. James(talk/contribs) 06:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


1997 outdoor bas relief sculpture and tile murals. No FoP in the US for artwork. James(talk/contribs) 07:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom. Not a UK Government work. DrKay (talk) 07:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Libiya11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Is User:Libiya11 the same as the people behind Temehu website? The incomplete metadata of these images show copyright statement: "This images is copyrighted. All rights reserved. www.temehu.com." Otherwise, COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle may apply in this case.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the photo has logo too prominently depicted. Unless we get VRT-permission from "Globaalsed eestlased" rights holder, the image must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ma olen üsna kindel, et Rainer või Joonas pole selle pildi kasutamise vastu (Raineriga näiteks selle pildi tegemise ajal ka vestlesime, et see läheb Vikipeediasse), aga pole mahti lube taga ajada, nii et kui tuleb maha võtta siis tuleb maha võtta, mis seal ikka. Sillerkiil (talk) 12:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See on pigem ikkagi taustal. Vähemalt on üsna selge, et see logo pole kindlasti foto põhimotiiviks ja pole ka olnud põhjuseks, miks fotograaf selle ülesvõtte tegi. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by I.Mahesh as no source (No source since) Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rangan Datta Wiki Hello, please check that text in India is not covered under Freedom of Panorama. If the text is produced by the Government of India, you can tag with with GODL license, please check if it falls under the same, thanks.iMahesh (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC) iMahesh (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Heart Truth 2011

[edit]

According to the EXIF data in Flickr, which is not visible here in Commons for some unknown reason, the copyright holder of the images are DAN & CORINA LECCA, not the Flickr uploader.--Syrus257 (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file has no basis in reliable official sources - poor copy Buckshot06 (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Katja Irion - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nochmal zur Erklärung: Christian Besch hat die Urheberrechte an diesem Pressefoto übertragen bekommen und hat mir dieses eigens für diesen Zweck hier geschickt! Was können wir tun, damit das Bild nicht gelöscht wird? Junei1986 (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have him contact COM:VRT, or you can contact them if you can present written evidence for the permission you say you have. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks, the email is in progress. Junei1986 (talk) 09:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MAYYAWEE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Studio quality photos with no exif, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map is not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Looks like an excerpt of this UK Hydrographic Office chart, but the version I found didn't have the "high risk area" marked (probably because it's a few years newer than this upload). The original chart may have some educational value, but this undated, low-resolution, cropped thumbnail doesn't. Omphalographer (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyright violation (unless this is just PD-simple which is definitely possible). There is no evidence that it was licensed under CC0 on the Discord branding page linked to in the description... PseudoSkull (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find a copyright for logos, because of this I've set as CC. After delete, I'll search again. Wiki6421 (talk) 18:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This logo meets the threshold for copyright protection, should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. View logo copyright license at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Discord_logo.svg Astrinko (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean  Keep. Certainly not CC BY SA as this file page claims, but we should take what Wikipedia's files say with a grain of salt. They often take the "quick, safe route" with their images and don't check for the possibility of PD status, and for w:File:Discord_logo.svg there's no detailed case for it not passing the threshold of originality. They just used their default fair use template; not much of a case at all.
Looking at the examples at Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Threshold_of_originality, this seems to be right on the border of what would be acceptable. Compare File:American Owned American Made Logo.jpg with simple curves, File:Geek Squad logo.svg with simple curves, File:Nikken logo and wordmark.svg with simple curves, File:Los Angeles Football Club.svg with specific angles of lines. All of those were tossed out of court.
The Discord logo is a collection of very simple shapes, with one color, and one of the shapes happens to have a few curves. I'm willing to be proven wrong, but I think it passes. SnowyCinema (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyvio: Image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mr. Andersson aka Neo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Geohakkeri (talk) 12:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio - probably AI upscaled and retouched from https://ayartimes.com/?p=23948 159.205.179.12 19:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for your input. I wanted to clarify that the image File:Moe Myint Tun.jpg is actually sourced from this website: https://min.news/en/military/2041a79f5758b0eb92273c553d9334f3.html, not from https://ayartimes.com/?p=23948. And actually not AI upscaled or retouched since it's from the official website.
Best regards,
KhantWiki KhantWiki (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. min.news is not "official website" of Myanmar government/army so it doesn't matter.
2. ayartimes published earlier (august 2023) unretouched photo, photo from min.news is since then (august 2024) derivative work - both copyrighted
2. both sources do not contain CC license information, but "All rights reserved" at footer. 159.205.179.12 14:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Not 'own work' and no evidence of a free license on https://min.news/en/military/2041a79f5758b0eb92273c553d9334f3.html. --Achim55 (talk) 19:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm nominating this image for deletion because it is an AI-enhanced version, which may not meet the standards for use on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. I recently uploaded the original version, which is a key consideration for maintaining authenticity and quality of content on these platforms. KhantWiki (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moe Myint Tun during a meeting in Russia in June 2021.jpg NinjaStrikers «» 12:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

en:Shams Tabrez is deleted due to non-notability. Probably his photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the threshold of originality, see [1] Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the threshold of originality, see [2] Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not in PD as claimed. Could be in 1960s as the linked picture. Notice the same suit and background? George Ho (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mediacom EPFL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All credited to EPFL media library, needs VRT to keep

Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader's account has a ticket. Can you check if the uploads are covered and fix accordingly?
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please check if any uploads might have been deleted by error.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Floris Minderhoud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

c1943 photos, not own work. may be free but needs more info

Gbawden (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mhmithun001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Text content only, no description, bad names, should be done with LaTeX: en:Help:Displaying a formula.

Yann (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from a Facebook page that does not state a CC BY 4.0 licence at all for this or any other of their pictures; definitely wrong claim of copyright holder. MrBenjo (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No source available. Possibly copyrighted Yann (talk) 15:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is part of another project of Wikimedia Foundation Chile and has license (by-nc). Is not a copyright violation.
Enterreno | Fotos históricas de Chile Alexisaherven (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad image Noah Aitchison Braga2024 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think your argument is not enough. In addition, the image doesn't reference the "Virgin vs. Chad" meme, but the countryball representation of the African country of Chad. Universalis (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lower-quality version of the file "Erie Railroad station in Kennedy NY 1909 postcard.webp" that I had previously uploaded. I accidentally uploaded the better version separately rather than replacing the old one. FischerFotos (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong license. According to [3] ITER Organization retains copyright in the pictures and videos. [...] The pictures and videos may not be sold, distributed or otherwise made available for use by third parties BorgQueen (talk) 19:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already sent the release to the drop box. It follows: Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Maury,

Sorry for the late reply. You can certainly use all the materials found on our website, we would just appreciate if you could quote us @ITER Organization. Many thanks,

Cordiales salutations /Mit freundlichen Grüssen/Kind regards/Dozo yoroshiku

Cecile FOUCHER DE BRANDOIS Admin & Communication Assistant Communication Division

ITER Organization, Building 72/4048, Office of the Director-General Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon - CS 90 046 - 13067 St Paul Lez Durance Cedex - France Phone: +33 4 42 17 69 04 Get the latest ITER news on https://www.iter.org/whatsnew Follow us on: Twitter - Facebook - LinkedIn - Instagram - Career page

It doesn't work like that. It needs to go through Commons:Volunteer Response Team. SL93 (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In particular, Permission grants must specifically contain a free license grant and may not merely give permissions for Commons or Wikipedia. jlwoodwa (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelegte Darstellung, könnte auch frei erfunden sein - bis zum Beweis des Gegenteils out of scope GerritR (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abbild eines vermutlich geschützten Werks - derivative of a copyrighted work GerritR (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Der Aufnäher zeigt unten einen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreiberg, ein seit Jahrhunderten genutztes Wappensymbol. Darüber stehen die Anfangsbuchstaben "DGN" für Deutsches Gymnasium Niederalteich; die simple Buchstabenform dürfte sich eher aus der Sticktechnik als einem schöpferischen Gedanken ergeben haben. Die farbige Gestaltung insgesamt ist durch die Verwendung zu erklären: Die Aufnäher befanden sich auf schwarzen "Turnleibchen". Insgesamt ist fraglich, ob es sich bei überschaubarer Schöpfungshöhe um ein geschütztes Werk handelt. Zudem wurde die Schule bereits Ende der 1950er Jahre in "St.-Gotthard-Gymnasium" umbenannt, so dass das Logo seit damals nicht mehr benutzt wird. Joachim Lierer (talk) 15:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a screenshot from a video under copyright by Colorado Storm chasers, an LLC registered in Cascade, CO.[4]

They posted the video to their Facebook page[5] and their Twitter stream[6] and this screenshot appears to come from around the 0:10 mark.

It was filmed in the United States in 2021.

There is no claim that the anonymous Colorado Storm Chasers videographer was a US Federal government employee performing their duties, or that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

As an video made in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the video was made. Individual frames from a video under copyright are also under copyright.

This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  1. when the weather.gov general disclaimer says that material not in the public domain will be specifically noted, it means that it must be published with a formal copyright notice. Whereas in reality, not only has the NWS never promised any specific form of notation, there is ample evidence to demonstrate this is not their general practice. This belief also chooses to ignore the words elsewhere in the disclaimer that state that third party images are used by the NWS under license, and to contact the third-party creators for re-use.
  2. the words of a NWS Sioux City regional office policy that placed some public submissions in the public domain somehow applied to this image, although there is nothing to connect it with that office. (The still was published by the Grand Junction office).

Without clearer evidence that Colorado Storm Chasers intended to place this screenshot from their video in the public domain, we need to delete this under COM:PRP. Rlandmann (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per @Rlandmann and PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 15:00, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been sourced from Page 11 of Maddox, R. A., M. S. Gilmore, C. A. Doswell III, R. H. Johns, C. A. Crisp, D. W. Burgess, J. A. Hart, and S. F. Piltz, 2013: Meteorological analyses of the Tri-State tornado event of March 1925. Electronic J. Severe Storms Meteor., 8 (1), 1–27.

It was published in the United States in 2021.

Two out of eight of the article co-authors worked for the NOAA , but there is no claim that the article was written solely by US Federal government employees performing their duties.

As a work produced in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the article was written.

This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  • the general disclaimer for the weather.gov website advises that some of the content there is in the public domain
  • some images submitted to the NWS Sioux City regional office by members of the public are in the public domain

This image was not published on weather.gov, and there is nothing to connect it to the NWS Sioux City regional office, so neither of these rationales apply to this image. Rlandmann (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Delete – Although aspects of the image are in the PD (made by U.S. government employees as confirmed via the image caption), aspects of it are not PD, including the tornado tracks, which were modified by the authors. A check of the paper also indicate the project was funded by the w:National Science Foundation, not NOAA. If it was NOAA, that would be a different story as it would be PD as part of the NOAA Library Repository. I also checked the NOAA Library Repository and it is not listed. Due to the modifications and lack of potential evidence of PD status, this is a clear delete. WeatherWriter (talk) 00:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per @Rlandmann and @WeatherWriter. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was taken by Tim Marshall in the United States in 2023, and was included by the NWS in a presentation published to arcgis.com.[7]

There is no claim that Marshall was a US federal government employee performing his duties, or that this image is ineligible for copyright for any other reason.

As a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as it was taken.

This image was uploaded to Commons under rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template at the time; that

  • the general disclaimer for the weather.gov website advises that some of the content there is in the public domain
  • some images submitted to the NWS Sioux City regional office by members of the public are in the public domain

This image was not published on weather.gov, and there is nothing to connect it to the NWS Sioux City regional office, so neither of these rationales apply to this image.

Without any evidence of permission that the photographer released this image into the public domain or under a free license, it is apparently unfree. Rlandmann (talk) 03:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per @Rlandmann and PRP. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 15:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]