Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/05

4 September 2024

6 September 2024

Deletion requests on 5 September 2024

September 5

File:Jerry "Wonda" Duplessis 2024.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Odd rationale. There is no "source" to validate. The photo is likely the original one (9MB) and has full EXIF. Günther Frager (talk) 00:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CariocasOficial (talk · contribs)

User uploaded a lot of (professional?) football club logos. Claims all are their own work with a CC license. Unlikely to be their own work.

William Graham (talk) 01:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, the contributions made by me were to be able to contribute Peruvian soccer and its teams to the community. It should be noted that I did it because there was a user who simply disappeared and there are some teams that lost their image on the page. What I did was recover the shields and add some well-made ones because there were some poorly made or taken from other pages, and if you insist that you are going to delete them, I will accept it, I only did it to contribute to Peruvian football.

And if all my contributions are deleted, I will officially withdraw from contributing to the page.

Thanks for everything.

Sincerely.

CariocasOfficial CariocasOficial (talk) 04:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yacht Club Station.png

COM:FOP Qatar jlwoodwa (talk) 01:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlwoodwa (talk • contribs) 01:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSS001.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russia recently amended its FoP law to allow treating images of things like statues etc. under a "sort of" FoP rule as long as those images are used for travel guides and the like. With this, Wikivoyage can host such images without restrictions like under a fair use rationale. The nominated image is used on Russian Wikivoyage and likely falls under the new FoP regulation. However, there's currently no local copy of the image on Wikivoyage. I've marked the image for transfer and am asking the closing admin to please wait with the deletion until the image has been transferred to Wikivoyage. Nakonana (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out! Much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaska tornado in 2024.jpg

This image of an event that happened on April 19, 2024 was published on the @NWSAnchoraage X stream with the attribution "Credit to Geremy Clarion who captured these pictures"[1]

There is no claim that he was acting as an employee of the US federal government, or that the photo was ineligible for copyright for any other reason. Therefore, as a photo taken in the United States after 1989, copyright existed from the moment it was taken.

The attribution does not claim or imply that the photographer transferred his rights into the public domain or published this image under a free license.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either. Rlandmann (talk) 04:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional Delete – I would recommend someone try to contact the person who took the picture. Especially since it is used on the w:List of Alaska tornadoes En-wiki page. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 20:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep? — Hey @Rlandmann: and Hurricane Clyde, this image has been uploaded to the Commons multiple times (under different licenses): File:EF0 tornado Rusty Point, AK 2024 (1).jpg, File:EF0 tornado Rusty Point, AK 2024 (2).jpg, File:EF0 tornado Rusty Point, AK 2024 (3).jpg, so some administrative merges MAY need to happen (Continue reading this before merging stuff). However, ChessEric discovered the first-ever actual photo of a tornado on the DAT…this one. URL for the DAT. I confirmed it is on the DAT still. The DAT caption only says, “Weak landspout observed near Rusty Point.”, no attribution or anything. Since it is on the DAT, this should be a kept photo? I can also confirm the DAT has not one, but three photos of the tornado listed for that specific “survey” point: 1 2 3. Since it is 3 different photos, maybe no merge needs to happen? I am not sure really at all, but it is confirmed to be on the DAT, so {{PD-DAT}} should apply? Maybe? WeatherWriter (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per @WeatherWriter, DAT images are public domain. Striking out my previous comment. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 18:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks WeatherWriter! This definitely needs a closer look. The most basic question to resolve is: are these all really the same image? --Rlandmann (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I believe this DR image (the "(0)" image), is the same as the "(3)" image. Image "(1)" and "(2)" look to be more and more zoomed in than "(3)/(0)". That said, the actual tornado looks slightly different in each of the 3 photo zooms. Metadata is also different for each photo (specifically shutter speed/zoom and other things). The time stamps are the same minute though. Based on that, I think the photos are just taken within seconds of each other, but still different actual photos, not the same one. So this image (calling it "(0)" to separate them even though it doesn't have a "(#)") is the same as "(3)", so those need merging together. But "(1)" and "(2)" are different. WeatherWriter (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question, then, with obviously major implications... is it even possible that a photo not taken by an NWS/NOAA employee might have made its way into the DAT?

I've reached out to someone in the right place with the right name to be the photographer credited by the NWS, to see what they have to say about it. But have we ever seen such a thing before? --Rlandmann (talk) 12:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've not. The DAT is used for NWS-based damage photos. This is also the first non-damage photo I know of on the DAT. If for some reason, it isn't an NWS employee photo, then I would chop that up to the Alaskan office using it differently than every-other NWS office, since that's the fifth Alaskan tornado ever recorded (last one before this year was in 2005, well before the DAT records stuff). From what I know of: It is the first photo of a tornado on the DAT. Also...I checked from January 1, 2013 to present day...that's the first "damage point" on the DAT in Alaska, and subsequently the first in NWS Anchorage's area. So, if it isn't an NWS employee photo, this would 100% be a one-off instance of an Alaskan office who never uses the DAT, using it one time. WeatherWriter (talk) 13:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; that makes perfect sense to me. To be explicit about my thinking; even if we do find this to be a non-NWS and non-free image, I don't think it automatically calls into question everything else we've sourced to the DAT so far. As I've said in different contexts, given the sheer volume of images, individuals, and timescales involved, 100% consistency would be astonishing. There are bound to be weird anomalies, and this could very well be one! --Rlandmann (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I assume @Rlandmann that this would still be a perfect candidate for NFF on En-Wiki. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 16:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it would, but for this image, that should not influence any !votes here, as that is EN-Wiki and this is the Commons, a separate project. WeatherWriter (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority (if not all) the images we're talking about would be candidates, including this one. However, as WeatherWriter points out, in this particular instance, we seem to have multiple very similar images of this tornado. If it's found to be unfree, then NFF could only justify using one of them. (Not that I think anyone would mind, just noting the technicality in the hope it might better illustrate how NFF operates). --Rlandmann (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

File:Трейл-кросс памяти Янышенко Б.В. и Онучина М.Н.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bottom of the source website says "Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International". The 2D work mentioned above can be found in this article of said source website: https://simfmo.rk.gov.ru/articles/9afe3f1f-2a7a-43fd-9034-9af1b08dae22 Nakonana (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Данные соревнования по бегу проводятся структурой Министерства спорта Крыма, фото выполнено пресслужбой Министерства спорта Крыма и размещено на его сайте. Рекламный передвижной банер размещен в лесу на месте финиша и также выполнен и принадлежит структуре Министерства спорта Крыма. На все материалы сайта министерства лицензия CC BY 4.0

These running competitions are held by the structure of the Ministry of Sports of Crimea, the photo was taken by the press service of the Ministry of Sports of Crimea and posted on its website. The advertising mobile banner is located in the forest at the finish line and is also made and belongs to the structure of the Ministry of Sports of Crimea. All materials on the website of the ministry are licensed CC BY 4.0 --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20170316 Nya kontor Malmo (33444727466).jpg

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:State of the Oresund region 2020 DK SE nya beslutsfattare over Oresund (50568935376).jpg

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Real Estate Oresund 8 februari 2018 talare SE (25014553167).jpg

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20190319 Mentala granshinder Öresund (46814906335).jpg

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:釋天崧法師.jpg

Lack of detail EXIF, potential copy violation according to previous contribution S8321414 (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oresundsinstituttet LIVE 18 nov (50589823053).jpg

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of each image A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200513 Checkpoint 2020 ny bog DK med text (49897050981).jpg

COM:DW issue, unknown copyright status of the incorporated image A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KakaoTalk Photo 2024-09-04-08-34-24.jpg

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 05:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Korean and English Wikipedia disagree — both have articles on this k-league soccer player / association football coach. See w:ko:이창원 (축구인) and w:en:Lee Chang-won. The articles were created in 2008 and 2009 respectively. Nakonana (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammad agha zamani dash siya.jpg

There is an animated image in the photo, most likely copyrighted. Astrinko (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Платформа Скриншот.webp

There is some copyrighted content in this screenshot. Astrinko (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:JJLiu112

These images were all uploaded by myself, because I am apparently too daft to look at the licence requirements here before uploading a tranche of copyrighted photographs, their CC licence on the Natl. Portrait Gallery being non-compatible. I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused. --JJLiu112 (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Images by Walter Stoneman (d. 1958) would be under copyright until at least 2029. I haven't looked at all the photos to see if other photographers' work are included here. The National Portrait Gallery's licensing has some non-copyright overreach in it for items that are covered by {{PD-Art}} or {{PD-Scan}} (see, en:National Portrait Gallery and Wikimedia Foundation copyright dispute), so looking at information about publication and the photographer is necessary. —Tcr25 (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To my recollection all of the photographs are by Stonema save for Ernest George in 1919; that, however, is also covered under a non-compatible licence. JJLiu112 (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Ernest George one is attributed to a company (Bassano Ltd.), not an individual photographer, given its age {{PD-UK-unknown}} (together with {{PD-Scan}}) may apply to that one. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like File:Jo Grimond in 1961.jpg is by Walter Bird (d. 1969) so under copyright until at least 2040. File:David Steel in 1978.jpg (by an unnamed photographer with Bassano & Vandyk Studios)is too recent to be out of copyright. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, I forgot about those. Yes, they are definitely worth deleting. Would you recommend relabelling Ernest George? JJLiu112 (talk) 17:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead an updated the file info & license. I'd welcome other editors weighing in on whether or not my interpretation is correct. —Tcr25 (talk) 00:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Stoneman images per COM:UK#Known author (Walter Stoneman), David Steel in 1978.jpg and Jo Grimond in 1961.jpg. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:中華民國教育部新版部徽.png

這是一個錯誤的部徽且詆毀公家機關形象，並會造成其他使用者於網路搜尋時誤用，請刪除他。 A931404 (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what this means or whether it's a deletion reason (Google translation): "This is a wrong emblem that denigrates the image of public agencies and may cause other users to misuse it when searching online. Please delete it." However, if this is under copyright, it wouldn't be a textlogo and should be deleted for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by Jacob Historian

All three of these photos are apparently from Google Maps, with the different authors named for each presumably being users who uploaded their images to Google. I'm assuming pictures uploaded to Google Maps do not have a Commons-compatible license by default (please correct me if I'm wrong) and I see no evidence of one provided here. (Note that the date provided, 1640, is of course not the date of the photo but the date of the building pictured.) R Prazeres (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hurricane Beryl—Significant Flooding in Houston.jpg

This image was taken in the United States in 2024, and published on the NWS's X stream, crediting Donald Sparks.[2]

There is no claim or suggestion that he was working as an employee of the US federal government or that this image was ineligible for copyright for any other reason. Therefore, as an image created in the US after 1989, copyright came into being as soon as the image was made.

This image has been uploaded to Commons based on a rationale that it is covered by the site disclaimer for weather.gov and/or the submission guidelines for the Sioux City NWS office.

This file is not hosted on weather.gov, so the disclaimer for that site does not appear to apply, and there is no evidence to connect it with the Sioux City office image submission guidelines, so this rationale does not appear to apply either.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 20:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facilitating discussion since no one has commented in a week and only two people have commented in total: courtesy pings to the following: @WeatherWriter @Sir MemeGod @Hurricanehink @Jmabel @Consigned @Berchanhimez @ChessEric @GeorgeMemulous. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 21:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The photo is from X and not even on an event page. We shouldn’t be plucking photos off X like this. ChessEric (talk) 02:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:This piece was so much different than everything else (8437745538).jpg

painting by Pablo Picasso. Not in public domain as Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 06:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Health is sick? What about your country?.......DSCF2970a (2726146330).jpg

unfree commercial copyrighted work, wrong license 2A01:599:918:3B62:C78:2698:2804:7162 06:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:المنشدـمحمدـرشاد.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file description claims that this is a musician. We appear to have articles on two Wiki projects of an Egyptian musician with that name. If the depicted musician and the one in the article are they same, then it's not just a personal photo, and in scope. See: w:ar:محمد رشاد and w:arz: محمد رشاد. Nakonana (talk) 22:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by other uploads of the same user, the singer appears to have received some kind of award, and has some sort of contact to politicians. If the singer is found to be out of scope, the other photos of him should also be deleted. Nakonana (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:صورة ملك الصواف في الملعب.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have more than a million followers on Instagram and TikTok [3][4]. Also claims to be a professional Syrian soccer player. And something about an invitation to the Miss Lebanon stage[5]. But the uploader appears also to be the depicted subject, so questionable license and likely promotional aim. Nakonana (talk) 23:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tugraozu1 (talk · contribs)

Unused content (mostly logos) related to non-notable groups: tr:Kullanıcı_mesaj:Tugraozu1, out of scope

Nutshinou ^Talk! 07:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Zeiträume by André Heller

presumingly COPYVIO, asking for 2nd opinion

Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid but we will need to delete these photos because they depict artworks by a living artist.

Gnom (talk) 07:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for

not by contemporary artist, image from Commons, ev. text could be the problem
not by contemporary artist, all images from Commons, ev. text could be the problem
text only and below ToO, engraving is old
text only, short description of the artwork

--Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the text in these images really below the threshold of orginality? Gnom (talk) 07:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Mecca.svg

Ygguhgyugg Strmare (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense DR closed, no valid reason for deletion provided. I've opened a new deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of municipalities of Saudi Arabia. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Mecca.svg

There is no government source that specifies this flag as the flag of the Municipality of Mecca. According to w:WP:FOTW, FlagsOfTheWorld is an unreliable source. Howardcorn33 (talk) 07:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After some research i have found that a correct flag of Mecca, which is here: Strenatos (talk) 04:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE. If you're sure you know what the correct flag is, you should try to substitute it for all the uses of this file before nominating a file in use for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fellowearthian (talk · contribs)

Suspected copyright violations: claimed own work, but several images are taken from https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/geosciences/2023/05/making-my-dreams-a-reality-how-i-landed-a-spot-on-the-bbcs-the-sky-at-night/ and https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mia-frothingham_students-change-teaching-activity-6891771347031130112-34Ko. File:Mia professional.jpg file EXIF shows "Author Tato Gomez".

MKFI (talk) 08:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hueljay (talk · contribs)

Artwork by a living artist, VRT permission from artist needed.

MKFI (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calcutta Nostalia painting done by me.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Wikishovel as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: non-free image copied from https://www.saatchiart.com/en-gb/art/Painting-Calcutta-Nostalgia-Avanish-s-Calcutta/1061906/8123836/view
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. External source credits this painting to Avanish Trivedi, which resembles the username of the uploader. So, he/she might indeed be the painter. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragn.gif

This file was initially tagged by Ильдар55 as Copyvio (Copyrighted) and the most recent rationale was: free use Yann (talk) 08:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Derivative of copyrighted cartoon characters. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It does seem like a copyvio. I'll miss this GIF. Jeraxmoira (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sugababes performing at O2 Arena 2023.jpg

Despite a ticket being received (and accepted) by the VRT for this and another Sugababes image, I have reason to believe that the uploader is not who they say they are and/or do not have permission to use this image. Ben Birchall is not the photographer of this image, as evidenced by [6] and [7]. A previously uploaded and since deleted Girls Aloud image was also sourced from a fan's Twitter account. Breaktheicees (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2024090310011662 regarding File:Sugababes performing at O2 Arena 2023.jpg and File:Sugababes in August 2022.jpg. Yesterday I requested the original, unmodified file with EXIF to verify authorship. Let's wait a couple days and see. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Pending the results of this, I also think that File:Sugababes at Asian Music Awards 2010.jpg and File:Sugababes at Mardi Gras 2001.jpg are questionable for the same reasons. This could very well be unfounded on my part, but I do think it's worth investigating. Breaktheicees (talk) 00:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:You members ( Luke, Ame, Mark ).jpg

Unclear copyright status and educational value Fenikals (talk) 10:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sateek Village Mizoram, india.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aibawk Solomon203 (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sateek, Mizoram, 796190 sateek khua History, mizoram lushai hills.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aibawk Solomon203 (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a reason for deletion unless you are trying to abuse the DR process. Please provide a reason for deleting the image you nominated.--125.230.80.164 11:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaviani flag.png

I don't like this file Azarmidoxt (talk) 10:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unclear that this alleged flag has any historical basis. Omphalographer (talk) 23:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cd front.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Fenikals as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Album cover PD-ineligible, but may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Splatoon 3.svg

This file was initially tagged by Kirilloparma as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-trivial logo Yann (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I uploaded this logo to match old SVG Splatoon logos such as the Splatoon and Splatoon 2 ones.

I consider this SVG as complex as the Splatoon 2 logo and therefore I would like it to not be deleted as I don't think it is an infringement of copyright since it is not complex enough to be copyrighted, or at least is as much complex as the old logos which are marked as non complex enough.

Ultimately, if it gets deleted for being too complex, I think the Splatoon and Splatoon 2 ones should be deleted under the same criteria. Wmyttmlimvty (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melania Dalla Costa - (2024).jpg

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Yann (talk) 11:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahesh Sarmalkar.jpg

Unused personal banner for non-contributor (all mainspace edits were bad and reverted), out of scope. Nutshinou ^Talk! 11:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Incendie de la Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres.jpg

Image du tableau mise en ligne sans accord du propriétaire pour droits sous Commons. Image téléchargée depuis un article de journal (droits autorisés) 46.20.174.34 11:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Public domain artwork, author died more than 70 years ago. EU ruled out copyrights on reproductions of PD works. Change license. Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bharatiya Janata Party logo.svg

complex logo at the threshold of the complexity allowed here. Discussion is required to determine whether we may hold it. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Simple logo of a lotus. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hd 98c06e81682c61f46e3a706a4155918e 65ca2248920e3 обработано.jpg

Not own work and a copy of the file Ардатов. Ильинская церковь.jpg Here the quality is better, so probably makes sence to replace the other image with this one Leokand (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the file information and the license. I disagree with replacing the other one with this one because the file name of this one says "обработано", which means "edited". The other one would be the original one. They both might be worth keeping. Nakonana (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ильинская церковь сейчас.jpg

Not own work, photo from the internet: https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/get-altay/6310045/2a00000181f495a502105639c465ab8bdbc4/XXXL Leokand (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Baloe1939 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope. Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.

Sinigh (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supian Suri, 2024.png

Personel photo, no indication of purported creative commons license or that uploader had the right to upload the work under stated licence Technetium 99m (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Agate

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 12:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St. Elmo's Fire

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silvia Careddu Wikipedia.jpg

copyright violation? see https://www.pfz.hu/en/koncert/1531/all-the-best Xocolatl (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, As Silvia Careddu's webmaster I can assure you that this photo beongs to Silvia, and is commonly distributed to concert venues and news outlets for pubblicity purposes, Silvia herself has asked me to use this photo as her Wikipedia shot. Coneillmilano (talk) 12:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have Silvia contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ženg (talk · contribs)

Inconsistent PD rationale. You can't state the author is died over 70 year ago if you don't know who the author is. The country of origin must be determined in each case to check whether these are PD.

Quick1984 (talk) 12:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hatikva vocal.ogg

Delete - Clearly a copyvio Wheatley2 (talk) 19:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Civenna - Santi Materno e Ambrogio (cropped).png

low quality crop Almàr23 (talk) 13:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhodobryum cf. roseum on garden wall.jpg

Misidentified - have checked with specialists and this really CANNOT be identified from the image, better not to have the image. Shyamal L. 13:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hev Abi circa 2024.jpg

This file is being nominated for deletion as it may be a copyright violation. The file, a photo of Filipino rapper Hev Abi, is claimed to be the uploader's work and was released on the Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. The file's description in the summary section states, "Spotify profile picture of Hev Abi", which shows that the file may be non-free content. The photographer or the owner may not have permitted it to be used here on the Commons, or the file may have been under a different license. The uploader's action of falsely claiming the photo as their own and licensing it under a possibly different license may constitute license laundering and other copyright violations. This file needs to be reviewed to verify if the owner of the photo gave permission for it to be used here on the Commons and be released under the license it was released under. AstrooKai 13:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SHAMSUDHEEN PUTHIYAVEETTIL 215.png

The picture was taken in 1954, but the owner's name and country of origin are unknown. It is feared that the file is not yet included in the "public domain" license. Astrinko (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franck fernandel marseille 1972 archives privées libre de droits.jpg

This file was initially tagged by VFP75 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy and is externally used (https://www.libramemoria.com/deces-celebres/2011/06/08/frank-fernandel-le-fils-de-l-acteur-marseillais-fernandel-est-decede). -- Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svobodné noviny - 23.5.1945 - volume 1, issue 1.jpg

Newspaper from 1945. Authors of some texts died after 1953 -> unfree texts. Harold (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Nová svoboda" by Eduard Bass - en:Eduard Bass died in 1946 -> ok
"Naše úkoly a cesty" by Hubert Ripka - en:Hubert Ripka died in 1958 -> not ok
"Rudý prapor nad Berlínem" by TASS - an anonymous translation of an article by Soviet news agency en:TASS -> not sure
"Labouristé žádají volby" - an article by Czechoslovak news agency en:ČTK -> not sure
"Hroby na Rokosce" poem by Vladimír Thiele -> cs:Vladimír Thiele died in 1997 -> not ok
"Lidice" by Ladislav Matějky -> en:Ladislav Matějka died in 2012 -> not ok

--Harold (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments in Albania & Kosovo 2024

Structured the title wrongly Klein Muçi (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gen Htay Maung Gen Bo Mya Gen Khin Nyunt.jpg

probably not an own work. The same photo (with the same white frame) was found at a blog since 2012 Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 15:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:General Khin Nyunt.jpg

The enhanced version of General Khin Nyunt is already uploaded by me and hence this file is low quality and shall be deleted since it's unneeded now and since the enhanced version that I uploaded is better. Thanks! KhantWiki (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, image is in use on English Wikipedia which prefers to use genuine historical photos over AI-enhanced versions that make guesses about what a person's face might have looked like up close. Belbury (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that AI-enhanced images are not allowed. Then You're free to delete or remove the Request for "nominated for deletion". Keep the original and maybe delete the AI-enhanced version which I will request nominate for deletion. Thank you for your help! KhantWiki (talk) 13:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other khin Nyunt picture is better I think and is more high-quality. KhantWiki (talk) 18:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What other picture do you mean? If you're referring to File:Enhanced Portrait of General Khin Nyunt.jpg, you asked at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Enhanced Portrait of General Khin Nyunt.jpg for it to be deleted, and it has been. Belbury (talk) 18:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. That enhanced portrait of Khin Nyunt is already deleted and requested by me to be deleted. Since it's already deleted, it's not problem. The one I uploaded recently now is just increased brightness and clarity instead of being AI Enhanced. Now there's no need to be requested since everything looks good now. I suggest ending the discussion now since everything looks great. KhantWiki (talk) 17:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't want this file to be deleted after all, okay. Belbury (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I don't want this file to be deleted, the AI-enhanced version has been deleted as intended. The recently uploaded one features only minor adjustments, with no AI enhancements. While there's no immediate need for deletion on the recently uploaded one, if the admin proceeds to delete it, I'll have to upload again which will be quite difficult. Thank you for your consideration. KhantWiki (talk) 19:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Khin Nyunt.jpg

A cropped and altered photo of File:Gen Htay Maung Gen Bo Mya Gen Khin Nyunt.jpg which has disputed license/ownership. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gen Htay Maung Gen Bo Mya Gen Khin Nyunt.jpg Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 15:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burma Army EE-9 Cascavel.jpg

probably not an own work. same photo was found at [8] since 2016. [ Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 15:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burma Army BRDM-2s.png

probably not an own work. armyrecognition.com credited the photo to Russian MoD Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 15:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сквер Свердлова и памятник Я. М. Свердлову, 1962 год. Фото с сайта pastvu.webp

Copy vio from this pastvu.com site Kotofey2016 (talk) 15:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandanar Yousafzai Tawas Khani.jpg

Image delete Romanmalikkhan (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide a reason for deletion. Nakonana (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there's already a deletion discussion on that file here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Romanmalikkhan. I don't know why the uploader removed the initial nomination just to re-nominate the files for deletion. Nakonana (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Horst Michael Lechner (talk · contribs)

Professional works by an architect. We need a confirmation of the license from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure.

Yann (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Freedom of panorama applies in Austria. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 22:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the issue. We need a permission from the photographers (or from Horst Michael Lechner if the copyright was transferred, along with a proof of that), and from the author of drawings. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 09:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are mixing up different things in a single deletion request, which is never a good idea. The drawings are, of course, protected by copyright, but for the photographs of buildings in Austria, freedom of panorama clearly applies. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not. Read what I wrote above, COM:DW, and COM:L, since you do not seem to understand how copyright works. In a picture of a building, there are two copyrights: one for the picture, and one for the building. The copyright for the building is covered by FOP, but we still need a permission for the picture. Yann (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are lumping things together. You put photographs of buildings in Austria (where freedom of panorama applies), photographs of buildings in other countries (where freedom of panorama may or may not apply) and drawings (where the copyright clearly is with the artist) in one single deletion request. That doesn't work. If there is a problem with the licensing or if it is unclear, whether the uploader actually is the photographer or has the necessary rights to upload the pictures, then it is a completely different issue and has to be stated accordingly. However, this then has nothing to do with the architects of the buildings, as you claim. (By the way, I understand very well how (European) copyright works, I may, however, not be able to express it perfectly in a foreign language like English.) --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The images by Horst Michael Lechner and the plans by Horst Michael Lechner were created by me – I am Horst Michael Lechner. Therefore, as far as I know, I can publish them as I wish. The other plans were created by our architectural office, so we also hold the copyright for them. Regarding the photographers' photos, we have the right to publish them, as granted by the photographers under the stated conditions. Since it is too complicated for me in a foreign language, I sent an email to info-de@wikimedia.org, which explains the situation in German. I hope I have satisfactorily addressed the copyright issues that have arisen Horst Michael Lechner (talk) 09:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Horst Michael Lechner: Hi, I repeat here what I wrote on your talk page. For all works previously published, or not personally created by you, we need a confirmation of the license from the copyright holder. That includes plans from your architectural office, and pictures by other photographers than you. Please see COM:VRT (COM:VRT/de in German) for the procedure. Yann (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok if the confirmations are in German? For English ones I would have to ask the Photographers for new ones. Horst Michael Lechner (talk) 10:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Horst Michael Lechner: Sure! The whole process can be done in German. Please see Commons:Support-Team. Yann (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910006372 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 10:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910007111 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910007291 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910007317 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910007442 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910007701 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910009833 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910009879 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2024090910009922 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maravijaya Buddha Image.jpg

Per the 2019 Copyright Act, there is no more freedom of panorama in Myanmar. Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 18:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logodealhapdan.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac.logo.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Profjaouadhafid (talk · contribs)

Screenshots of websites with unknown or unclear copyright status/permissions. Some are described as test uploads. All appear to be outside of COM:SCOPE anyway.

Marbletan (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Marina Piccdola Capri Albert Bierstadt 1859.jpeg

bad quality, different wrong colors, 2 better files File:Albert Bierstadt - The Marina Piccola, Capri - 1863-1 - Albright–Knox Art Gallery.tiff, File:Albert Bierstadt - The Marina Piccola, Capri.jpg, see also museum's website https://buffaloakg.org/artworks/18631-marina-piccola-capri Oursana (talk) 19:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Mi’kmaw History Month” (poster in Charlottetown, PEI).jpg

I took the photo of this poster, but after looking at the Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Canada, there's a possible chance that it is violating copyright. Daeva Trạc (talk) 19:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PCM CPJ's 29th Annual International Press Freedom Awards.jpg

Credited to Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images, no evidence that CPJ owns the rights Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:THE WRATH OF KHAN.png

Appeal for speedy deletion: The file File:THE WRATH OF KHAN.png is a colored text on a black background that I made in Photoshop. It's basically a copy of the old German version of Star trek 2 de.svg that had the Wikidata file before mine and that was used in almost all other versions of Wikipedia. It cannot infringe any copyright because, as the license indicates, it is a simple text on a black background, like the thousands of movie production logos on Commons. The user who requested the prompt deletion of this and other similar files "because it is a logo" has uploaded several similar negative versions, such as File:Star trek the motion picture logo black.png as logos too. Geom (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The star background and the light can be above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star trek 2 de.svg has no complex backgrounds. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Jpczcaya

File:Slidebean-logo.png
File:Slidebean-Logo-Square.png
File:Slidebean-Logo-Background.png
File:Slidebean-solution-slide.jpg (The background photo in this one may be copyvio?)
File:Slidebean-Logo.png

Images of uploader's company (see also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Slidebean_(2nd_nomination), where company was deemed unnotable and its article deleted). Delete under COM:ADVERT. --Rubýñ ^(Scold) 21:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files tagged by Winmyint998

File:Let Yar (cropped).jpg
File:Kosalla.jpg
File:Ko Yal Toe Yal Soe Soe Yal.jpg
File:Khin Myo Chit 1961.jpg
File:Khin Kyi portrait.jpg
File:Hubert Elvin Rance (cropped).jpg
File:Hubert Elvin Rance.jpg
File:Declaration of Independence of Burma.jpg
File:Do Aung Din Poster.jpg
File:Dobama protest.jpg
File:Dr Ba Nyan.jpg
File:Dr. Khun Yi.jpg
File:Duke of Lekaing, Kinwun Mingyi U Kaung.jpg
File:Ei Lu Baung Twin film poster.jpg
File:Family of Taw Phaya Gyi.jpg
File:First Class 1966 Poster.jpg
File:Hnin Pyauk Tae Nway film poster.jpg
File:Hsaung film poster.jpg
File:Daw Phwar Mhe- 001.jpg
File:Daw Mya Sein.jpg
File:Daw Mya Sein at London.jpg
File:Dagon Khin Khin Lay.jpg
File:Colonel Aung San 1942 (cropped).jpg
File:Col Ba Htoo.gif
File:Bo Ba Ko.gif
File:Bañā Cin - picture.jpg
File:Bawa Than Tha Yar poster.jpg
File:Bo Let Ya (Thakin Hla Pe).jpg
File:Bo Let Ya.jpg
File:Bohmu Aung in uniform.jpg
File:Boycotter film poster.jpg
File:Brigadier General Aung Gyi Gives a Speech after the end of the Mujahideen Insurgency in Arakan.jpg
File:Burma Independence Army enters Rangoon.jpg
File:Burma Independence Army.jpg
File:Burmese actress San Shar Tin.jpg
File:Chit A Mhya film poster.jpg
File:Chit Hlaing.jpeg
File:Chit Khwint Ma Paing film poster.jpg
File:Chun taung myosar a pyodaw sister of u mg mg tin.jpg
File:Chun taung htake khaung tin daughter of mindon.jpg
File:Chit Maung.jpg
File:Chit Thaw Maung Maung film poster.jpg
File:Chit Thaw Thu Ta Yauk film poster.jpg
File:Chit Thet Wai film poster.jpg
File:Chit Yay Sin film poster.jpg
File:Burmese actress Nwet Nwet Mu.jpg
Keep - These files were originally tagged by Winmyint998 for deletion for lacking proper sourcing. The source and year on most of these could be improved, but most of these files appear to be in the public domain and are allowed to be on Commons. I'm converting the speedy deletions to a regular deletion request, so these files can be looked at on a case by case basis. --ReneeWrites (talk) 23:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Another example of "I think the source is inadequate", no objection to renominating some. --RAN (talk) 03:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I looked at a couple of these and they were uploader in 2012. Realistically how long should we wait for a file with no source and/or year to be hosted on Commons before its resonable to nominate it for deletion based on the lack of information? (I'm not asking to be facetious, I'd seriously like to know). But then why vote keep? Some of these are clearly PD and I'm not a fan people nominating images that are otherwise clearly PD for deletion just because they lack a source or specific date of creation. I would like to know how long we should wait to delete files with no source or date in cases where it isn't clearly in the public domain though and someone should renominate said files here for deletion without includes the ones that are PD in with it. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
per above I suggest closing as Keep the bulk nomination (without prejudging that individual files may be renominated for specific problem). Seems misuse of the speedy tag. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Braydenstuffs (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious and personal flags (cf. en:User:Braydenstuffs/sandbox, en:Draft:Brayden Technologies, Incorporated).

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/05

September 5

Files uploaded by CariocasOficial (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by User:JJLiu112

Uploads by Jacob Historian

Files uploaded by Tugraozu1 (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Zeiträume by André Heller

Files uploaded by Fellowearthian (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Hueljay (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Baloe1939 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Ženg (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Horst Michael Lechner (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Profjaouadhafid (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by User:Jpczcaya

Files tagged by Winmyint998

Files uploaded by Braydenstuffs (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Braydenstuffs (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search