Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/11

10 September 2024

12 September 2024

Deletion requests on 11 September 2024

September 11

File:VLT de Sobral 02.jpg

Image without defined copyright. Possible copyright infringement. https://diariodonordeste.verdesmares.com.br/pontopoder/eleicoes-2022/metro-e-vlts-serao-gratuitos-na-grande-fortaleza-sobral-e-cariri-no-2-turno-das-eleicoes-1.3294273 Sorocabano 32 (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VLT de Sobral 01.jpg

Copyright infringement. At the end of the page there is the following inscription "© 2017 - 2024 – Governo do Estado do Ceará - todos os direitos reservados" /"© 2017 - 2024 – Government of the state of Ceará all rights reserved" (https://www.ceara.gov.br/2017/10/09/passageiros-no-vlt-de-sobral-triplicam-apos-tarifa-r-1/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mockup sukcesja.png

Out of scope: unused, nonsense AI-generated diagram with gibberish text. Omphalographer (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estação Boulevard do Arco 02.jpg

Copyright infringement (© 2017 - 2024 – Governo do estado do Ceará todos os direitos reservados)https://www.metrofor.ce.gov.br/2021/09/17/nova-estacao-boulervard-do-arco-e-requalificacao-da-av-dr-guarany-favorecem-a-mobilidade-urbana-em-sobral/ Sorocabano 32 (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moozr (1).jpg

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a bizarre scene (an abstract statue exploding in a fountain?). Omphalographer (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:0HhJrVqMT e6ASiiz2jAkQ.webp

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of an office building. Omphalographer (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cllr Luke Allan Holmes Official Portrait 2021.jpg

figure is not notable and image is not contained on any page. 2A00:23EE:13E8:47BD:781F:E3CB:C5AA:12C8 00:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be Luke Alan Holmes, a Councillor on the en:Durham County Council. As it has an article, I'm a bit loathe to delete this on "not notable", as the figure would surely qualify for a Wikidata item by virtue of serving on that council. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Umo Bassey Eno (cropped).jpg

File:OndoDeputygov.jpg

Stated to be created in Dec. 2023, but shows up on the internet in articles published in Sep. 2023. Copyright violation. https://dailynigerian.com/alleged-misconduct-court-stops/ Bremps... 01:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Clearly promotion. Ayane aka. eunn 02:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SizeIMG 1125.jpg

Ficou ruim e foge à proposta. Crominers20 (talk) 02:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SizepenisIMG 1122.jpg

Ficou ruim e foge à proposta. Crominers20 (talk) 02:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SizepenisIMG 1123.jpg

Ficou ruim e foge à proposta. Crominers20 (talk) 02:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SizeballIMG 1116.jpg

Ficou ruim e foge à proposta. Crominers20 (talk) 02:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SizepenisIMG 1119.jpg

Ficou ruim e foge à proposta. Crominers20 (talk) 02:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Logo.png

Not confident in copyright rules Superb Owl (talk) 02:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PD-textlogo per COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Headcount Logo.png

Copyright symbol in image Superb Owl (talk) 02:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. That's a ® (registered trademark) symbol, not © (copyright). Regardless, this is most likely under the US threshold of originality. Omphalographer (talk) 03:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mi Familia Vota logo.png

Unclear permission Superb Owl (talk) 03:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aseyori Kareem.png

Lo-rez photo of a non-notable person that is also at a wonky angle. Not useful for educational purposes. Also uploaded by someone who is using WMF wikis for personal spam. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Pennsylvania Project Logo.png

unclear copyright Superb Owl (talk) 03:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see anything on the source web site to indicate any of its contents are freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 03:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Makes no difference. PD-textlogo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NNCP-diversestripe-2-1198143639.png

unclear copyright Superb Owl (talk) 03:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing they can't copyright the outline of North Carolina, and that this is therefore PD-textlogo. Am I right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Th-3882301954.jpg

unclear copyright Superb Owl (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not CC on the source site as of now. I don't know whether the stylized peach is an issue under COM:TOO US or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jatun (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jeremy legrand (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Akshaykumar8948 (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 99minutoscom (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Print-pezeshkian-ira-jul2024.webp

Out of scope, not used Bremps... 03:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Graffiti in Ecuador

No Freedom of Panorama in Ecuador.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: For the previously edited files covered in this deletion request that have duplicate deletion notices, it's not worth to remove redundancy as these files will be deleted anyway. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Selección de Colores Aerosol.jpg (which does not depict graffiti itself), File:Quito sculpture - Avenida Brazil at corner with Avenida America.jpg (which has graffiti, but it's so simple as to not be copyrightable), and File:EC-Quito MPD graffiti 15.jpg (which is extremely simple text on a wall). Delete the rest, as they are photographs of copyrightable graffiti and Ecuador has no FOP. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis.png

Porn. 84.61.182.248 20:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - very unlikely to be used.62.254.133.139 21:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete With so many dicks given in this qual, out of scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 22:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. poor quality photo George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis.png

Far too blurred to be of any real value to the project Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt Out of scope, also rather undescriptive file name. funplussmart (talk) 22:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 06:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis.png

Unused COM:PENIS with low quality. — regards, Revi 10:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis.png

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, very poor quality penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penis.png

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would keep this. The quality is acceptable, and we'll otherwise get new (and much poorer) uploads under this name over and over again. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting argument, but this photo is just not good enough for me to agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mmhyper (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PS-4-Pro.jpg

Looks like an official render from PlayStation. No evidence to support the uploader's claim of ownership. Quasiboost (talk) 04:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homenatge a l'immigrant. Antonio Tenreiro. Andorra 134.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Antonio Tenreiro died in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 72.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Josep Viladomat died in 1989 A1Cafel (talk) 04:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 62.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Josep Viladomat died in 1989 A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Màrtir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 71.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Josep Viladomat died in 1989 A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 61.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Josep Viladomat died in 1989 A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 63.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Josep Viladomat died in 1989 A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escultura de J. Viladomat perante a igrexa parroquial de Sant Pere Mártir. Escaldes-Engordany. Andorra 73.jpg

No FoP in Andorra, artist Josep Viladomat died in 1989 A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casa de la Vall - Sculpture 1993.JPG

No freedom of panorama in Andorra A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mural @ Street art @ Montreal (29773276003).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural @ Street art @ Montreal (29773276003).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural near Granville Island (7295775984).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street Art @ Paris (15425600356).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street Art @ Paris (15448672075).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street Art @ Marais @ Paris (15354515106).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street Art @ Paris (8581748545).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art @ Poitiers (8381937858).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Architecturama "Haies" @ Street art @ Gay Village @ Montréal (30461570906).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art @ Le Plateau @ Montréal (29875918973).jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Guide to layout/Gallery pages

This page is redundant with Commons:Galleries and can be merged into it. I prefer all guides and guidelines about one subject to be at one place, so you do not have to search elsewhere for more information (I found out only yesterday that this page exists). In Commons:Guide to layout can a link be added to Commons:Galleries. JopkeB (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm actually kind of surprised that Commons:Guide to layout even exists at this point. Everything in it could be deleted or moved to a comparable guideline. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jona_Neidhart.jpg

File:Coq en métal @ Neydens (51070042478).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque @ Le Grand-Bornand (51024759133).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art @ Les Grands Voisins @ Paris (32578283682).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eye @ Paris 18 (32854569161).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art @ La Butte-aux-Cailles @ Paris (28484631976).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art @ La Butte-aux-Cailles @ Paris (28438485941).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art @ La Villette @ Paris (25164488704).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statues @ Garden @ Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière @ Paris (33560352271).jpg

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist Roger Vene A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statues @ Garden @ Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière @ Paris (33689714405).jpg

No FoP in France, needs permission from the artist Roger Vene A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Times Square - Manhattan - New York City (4854872163).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural of Ol' Dirty Bastard.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Priscila De Carvalho Urban Nature.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dental implant. jpg.jpg

likely copyvio; source given is google redirect for dental clinic Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 ZS 中山市 Zhongshan 石岐 ShiQi 鳳鳴路 FengMing Road 光明路 Guangming Road 中天古董車博物館 ZT Classic Car Museum September 2024 R12S 08.jpg

Copyrighted TV screen from TVB. メイド理世 (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hazrat Sultan Mosque

The mosque was completed in 2012. There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 13:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hazrat Sultan Mosque

No FOP in Kazakhstan

Prodraxis (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hazrat Sultan Mosque

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Kazakhstan.

A1Cafel (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone ought to inform all the Wikipedias and Wikivoyages about this deletion request and give them time to locally upload the photos we're using. Don't delete these files quickly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 ZS 中山市 Zhongshan 石岐 ShiQi 興中廣場 Central Power Plaza mall September 2024 R12S 62.jpg

{{FoP-China}} doesn't 2D works メイド理世 (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANES Affective Polarization through 2020.jpg

~~Awaiting copyright permission~~
Permission granted on September 16, 2024 (authors just ask for attribution)
Please close this request Superb Owl (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABC Group.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewRules Ent.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicki Minaj Performs “Majesty,” “Barbie Dreams,” “Ganja Burn,” “FeFe” - MTV VMAs - Live Performance.webm

Identified for speedy deletion by @Premeditated: but prior decision Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Wu-Tang_Clan_-_C.R.E.A.M._for_Yo_MTV_Raps.webm (and others I can list if necessary) supports the alternative position that this file should not be deleted. Dhx1 (talk) 06:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srinivas Raju.jpg

Copyright violation. Image has appeared in multiple websites:[1], [2], [3]. Not a work of uploader. --106.51.110.101 07:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neonode-Logotype-Black.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Qupygyha (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poverty is the Generalized cause of anxiety Not mental illness.jpg

cut off screenshot of headline, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chalcides simonyi.jpg

No indication of suitable licensing; just grabbed from iNaturalist (which dioes not grant a license compatible with use here) Elmidae (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:أشرف الرباطي.png

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:الكاتب الصحفي عادل المسعود.webp

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:لقطة الشاشة 2024-09-10 200817.png

(logo) Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 07:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Luana Corrêa (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional files/logos uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo for TeknoFlas.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arjun Tukaram Bansode.jpg

It's my self image upload by me this Image is my childhood. So I feel awkward I request to delete this. Arjunbansode0143 (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it Arjunbansode0143 (talk) 08:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arjun Tukaram Bansode.jpg

This my self image upload by me Arjunbansode0143 (talk) 03:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaël Segalen.jpg

The publication of this photo is contested by the subject (ticket 2024091010010837 on info-fr file). She says she did not consent to a public dissemination. We have no evidence that the photo was taken in the context of public activities, which would make the subject notorious. Since no Wikipedia article uses this photo and since this person does not seem to be notorious enough for a WP-article, we fall IMHO into the application of WP:BLP JohnNewton8 (talk) 08:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fichier- Affiche Alien Romulus.jpg

Image sous copyright Clodion (talk) 08:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:PLANS Guangxi (LHD-32)

The files are various screenshots of Chinese landing helicopter dock Hainan. While they were published by the China News Service, the watermarks (see e.g. ) clearly stated that they are authored by CCTV-7. While some of the files were kept because both were run by the Chinese government, it should still be reminded that they are still two distinct entities. The fact that CNS is authorized to publish the video, or the fact that both are controlled under the Chinese government, does not mean that they have the authority to license the file. This is especially true when they might slip some third-party works in their usually CC-licensed contents.

Ultimately, it is argued that the {{CC-BY-3.0}} licenses by CNS is null and void, and the files should be deleted without further permission from CCTV.

廣九直通車 (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So at the end of the day, the question is that: can you CC-license a work that is not created by you (or one that you do not hold copyright)? This is the case for this deletion request.

Previous deletion requests: 1, 2, 3.

@Holly Cheng: as closing administrator.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While there have been cases of government-run Flickr accounts releasing photos under free licenses that they were not authorized to, those were all (to my knowledge) photos taken by private photographers. Here, we have one government agency using photos from a different government agency. If the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, I don't think that's our problem. —holly {chat} 17:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion: The videos released by CNS on Youtube are just automatically released with CC BY-SA license, regardless of whether the third-party materials used are actually allowed to use this license. Although CNS and CCTV have the same bigger boss, I don't think their material licenses can be shared. Or what if I use CCTV's original materials (which may not have CC BY-SA license) as the basis for infringement? Therefore, the "unclean" videos released by CNS (including video screenshots) should not be considered CC BY-SA licensed. --Cwek (talk) 01:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the original CCTV video, posted on the "CCTV Military" account on Weibo. [4]。File:两栖攻击舰广西舰训练画面公开-3.png at first. File:两栖攻击舰广西舰训练画面公开-2.png at 00:24. File:两栖攻击舰广西舰训练画面公开-1.png at 01:48. --Cwek (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although Guangxi is very mysterious, there are few images that are publicly available and in compliance with the authorization. After much difficulty, some editors are eager to release them quickly. However, it is better to be careful with such cross-authorized materials. --Cwek (talk) 01:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In short:

Delete. If you are capable, go take photos yourself. Or you can look forward to it being put into service as soon as possible, so that when it passes through Japan and other places, the JSDF and the US Navy will definitely be able to take better photos. --Cwek (talk) 01:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fotgot it. IT has been IN SERVICE, and the JSDF has already taken a photo of it once (and it complies with public copyright license). It is a pity that we have to rely on foreign troops to see its appearance. (doge) --Cwek (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Magdeburg

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Kurt Tuch, who died in 1963. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2034.

Rosenzweig τ 09:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-Belarus

{{PD-Belarus}} is equal to {{PD-old-50}} (moreover PD-old-50 documentation mentions Belarus directly). There are no any specific term(s) or cases compared with {{PD-Russia}} or {{PD-Ukraine}}. Alex Spade (talk) 09:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sint Anthonis

This is not a gallery page: with only one image. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 09:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Montabaur

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Karl Staudinger, who died in 1962. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2033.

Rosenzweig τ 09:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kutubiyya Mosque 03.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kutubiyya Mosque 01.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:USAFacts Banner.png

Doubt that uploader owns the copyright to this image, proof is needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kutubiyya Mosque 02.jpg

I uploaded it by mistake IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Woodard signature.png

orphan png Green Weave (talk) 09:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? It doesn't seem like a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess he wants to say unused PNG is depreciated and request for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - You guess right! Green Weave (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CanakkaleKilitbahirKalesi.jpg

There are so many good pictures of this view that the picture won't be missed. I tried improving it but resolution, light and colours are terrible. Dosseman (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:OEBB Nachtzug Strecken streckennetz deutsch 2023.png

Copyrighted work taken from https://data.oebb.at/de/datensaetze~streckennetz-nachtzuege~ without stating a license to do so. 2001:A61:12C9:9B01:D86C:DC92:4438:BEAF 10:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Mach dir so bald wie möglich einen Augenarzt-Termin aus. Die Lizenz steht klar im Link drinnen. Linie29 (talk) 11:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephen Auerbach at the Elvis piano.png

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is, or appears to be (from their contributions at enWiki), a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT Yann (talk) 10:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of "SithCult".jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: very likely pulled off the internet for both works, the waving flag in particular looks like it is from a copyrighted flag waving software. Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, derivative work of copyrighted flag from Star Wars. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gardanne-FR-13-mairie-b1.jpg

Demande du téléverseur .C'est la meme image que : Gardanne-FR-13-mairie-a8 François GOGLINS (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IAA-Munich 2021 jf Innenstadt 0620.jpg

File:IAA-Munich 2021 jf EG-West-Exponat 0228.jpg

File:IAA Mobility 2021 Impressionen 12-0568.jpg

Files uploaded by Diemgood (talk · contribs)

All DW of the original image (sans text) and unnecessary duplicates. Plus Scope?

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Diemgood (talk · contribs)

All DW's - all need a free source

Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tukhchar’s home.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 195.19.124.25 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright infringement. The inscription on the photo Yann (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baker of Tukhchar.png

This file was initially tagged by 195.19.124.25 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright infringement. The inscription on the photo Yann (talk) 10:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fisher of Tukhchar.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 195.19.124.25 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright infringement. According to the properties of the photo, it is from the Internet Yann (talk) 10:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tukhchar mountaint.jpg

This file was initially tagged by 195.19.124.25 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright infringement. The inscription on the photo Yann (talk) 10:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ArthurGilf0rd (talk · contribs)

One has a bogus PD claim, the other is from a personal website that i don't think owns the rights to the photo

Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Loon op Zand

This is not a gallery page: with only one image. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mart Stam

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 10:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nuenen, Gerwen en Nederwetten

This is not a gallery page: with only one image. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albatross-JJSC.jpg

This is an album cover. The fact its marked as own work is tricky, but also the fact that its Creative Commons while on the other parts of the internet its still marked as copyrighted. The Emptiness Machine (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Het_Beste_Bier_van_Nederland_graphic.png

The source link says copywrited. The Emptiness Machine (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is just simple shapes and text, so it doesn’t qualify for copyright protection. Mitsjol (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riikonen_logo.jpg

Copywrited logo The Emptiness Machine (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of the image so think again loser. Tuomassr (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be rude, and contact COM:VRT to demonstrate that you created the logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I didn't create the logo, but I own the copyrights. Under those conditions contacting VRT is not necessary according to the Commons policy and I would like to see this deletion request removed asap. Thank you. Tuomassr (talk) 08:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it will be necessary for you to show them how you own the copyrights. Otherwise, I expect the file to be deleted. I'm just making a prediction based on my previous experience with deletion requests, and I'm not an admin and won't be taking part in the decision, so don't be mad at me but do seriously consider contact VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mad, just confused how the deletion procedure actually works. If I create a picture and upload it here on Wikimedia Commons, then how does it make sense that some random person is allowed to basically claim that I'm not the author of the image and thus request it to be deleted without even an argument to support it? And how am I even supposed to undeniably prove that I am the copyright holder of anything? In my case, I happen to work in the administration of the company that owns the logo and due to my position, I have full rights to it. Do I need to send VRT my work contract or some copyright statement to validate my upload? I apologize for my earlier rudeness, but I feel like this is only putting me and others through unnecessary trouble for no justified reason just because of some rubbish deletion request and that's what irritates me here the most. Of course, I'm happy to follow the Commons policy when it applies to common sense and provide the evidence that is needed, but I guess I just fail to understand why would I be put under such scrutiny here from the get-go as the legal copyright holder and my word not be deemed trustworthy. Tuomassr (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it definitely is annoying, but it's very unusual that a logo is uploaded here by someone who holds the copyright for it. I haven't dealt with the VRT folks personally, so I couldn't tell you how reasonable or unreasonable they are, but they will be the ones to ask about these things. Feel free to link this discussion for them. I'd be curious to hear later from you on how they treat you and what they ask for from you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Nördlingen

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Oskar Graf, who died in 1958. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2029.

Rosenzweig τ 11:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilanpo bodhisattva.jpg

This picture is of a bodhisattva in Cave 401 of the Mogao Caves in Dunhuang[5], and there is no reliable source that it is Pilanpo. Thyj (talk) 11:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean it should be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although the image is a public domain artwork, but is flipped. And the title and information are wrong. Thyj (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flip it if you like, edit the file description, and request COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PD artwork, descriptions etc. can be easily corrected by every user. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Çırağan Sarayı

This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 11:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The category is full of pictures, add a couple here with subtitles then. It's a better hobby compared to deleting. 200.39.139.0 16:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leagimenezwiki.jpg

Found online before upload https://marketdata.com.py/laboratorio/entrevistas/queremos-transformar-y-tener-un-estado-agil-110281/ - needs VRT Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Solaristhemainvocal (talk · contribs)

Solaristhemainvocal claims to be this singer. These are not selfies, so we need a permission from the photographer, or a proof that the copyright was transferred. Here are pictures of the same show credited to Sunpeach for mmm solar.

Yann (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unitalogo.png

License needs verification. Jonteemil (talk) 11:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Igorkhait (talk · contribs)

User has uploaded multiple press photo and claimed to be the owner. These images are likely from the web as wel.

File:Rostov-Arena1.jpg
File:Central Stadium Yekaterinburg1.jpg
File:Moscow Cityscape Sep2017.jpg
File:Moscow Cityscape2015.jpg
File:Eurasia2017.jpg
File:Naberezhnaya Tower2017.jpg
File:VEGAS retail-entertainment complex.jpg
~~File:Moscow Business Center Jun2017.jpg~~
File:Zaryadye24.jpg

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow Business Center Jun2017.jpg might be from https://www.flickr.com/photos/pcardo/38306698842 -- Geagea (talk) 09:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, corrected the source info for that one. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Igorkhait (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work. Small resolution, no metadata and the uploader already has lots of deleted copyright violations.

Didym (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norddorf - 75Pf. ND.png

This German Notgeld (emergency money) bill from the 1920s is a work of de:Arthur Goetting, who died in 1975. So it is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2046. Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Egrid Subregion map

This is not a gallery page: with only one image. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masjid Agung Kubah Kecubung Darurrahman Palangka Raya.jpg

No FoP in Indonesia, new building. Exagren (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PipeBocca (talk · contribs)

Unused personal images for non-contributor, out of scope.

Nutshinou ^Talk! 13:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les pingouins du 93.jpg

Probably Copyvio ComputerHotline (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zinsfestlegung Graf Ludwig von Arnsberg (StAMes, Best. 1, U3) Inhalt.jpg

File:Zinsfestlegung Graf Ludwig von Arnsberg (StAMes, Best. 1, U3) Inhalt.jpg Stadtarchiv Meschede (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grund für die Löschung ist, dass der Inhalt nicht dem Dateinamen entspricht. Es handelt sich um die Urkunde U7 und nicht um die U3 Stadtarchiv Meschede (talk) 13:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and change the name. "The reason for deletion is that the content does not correspond to the file name. This is the U7 certificate and not the U3" --RAN (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kianoosh Rezania (2017).jpg

This file was initially tagged by 129.185.170.119 as no permission (no permission since) Krd 13:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas-Renggli-by-Valeriano-Di-Domenico-web.jpg

possible copyvio © Valeriano Di Domenico - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Maps of country" galleries

These map galleries of countries are strictly redundant to the corresponding atlas pages (Atlas of Cyprus, Atlas of Japan, Atlas of France). So these gallery pages should be merged to the corresponding atlas pages. However, map galleries of country subdivisions can be kept, as long as there are no corresponding atlas pages for them. --Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are hundreds of countries that have a gallery page "Maps of country X" as wel as "Atlas of country X". Would you merge them all? They might have different purposes, different designs and/or different target groups. Can they not just coexist? Please make first an analysis of the differences before you start such a massive merge.

And why should the maps be merged into the Atlases and not the other way around? JopkeB (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we're going to merge these galleries, "maps of..." certainly seems like the more obvious page name. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both "maps of ..." and "atlas of ..." are okay, but I prefer the latter, since an atlas is a collection of maps and I'm trying to revive the dormant WikiAtlas project. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They might have different purposes, different designs and/or different target groups.

@JopkeB: I know there are galleries of specific types of maps by country or region. But I'm concerned with the general "maps of <country>" pages, which I feel is redundant to "atlas of <country>" pages. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another aspect that should be included in an analysis: perhaps the Atlas galleries are subjected to a strict format, while the Maps galleries may offer more freedom, depending on the available images? JopkeB (talk) 04:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JopkeB: I think the atlas galleries don't always have to follow a strict format to list images. For example, in Atlas of West Bengal, I used the <gallery> tag for the locator maps of divisions/districts of West Bengal, which is much better than the prescribed {{Left}} template in this case. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs • uploads) 14:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is still do not see an analysis of the differences between "Atlas of country X" and "Maps of country X", so I still do not know what the consequences will be if they are merged. --JopkeB (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adocus sengokuensis.png

This is confusing case and it is fairly uncertain that image is usable in Wikipedia. This image is uploaded from a researchgate page which shows Creative Commons licence.[6] However, document title shown in page "New trionychoid specimens and turtle fauna from the Lower Cretaceous Kitadani Formation of the Tetori Group in central Japan" and in PDF "A new species of the genus Adocus (Adocidae, Testudines) from the Lower Cretaceous of Southwest Japan" is completely different, definitely showing different documents. This researchgate links to this PeerJ preorint,[7] which shows Creative Commons licence but without any figure. And seems origin of PDF and figure uploaded here is this published paper,[8] which is not open access and does not show available licence. In other words, the author most likely uploaded the wrong PDF on the researchgate page. In PDF it is clearly shown that "© by the Palaeontological Society of Japan", so this image is probably not usable in Wikipedia. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze Statue of Higuchi Kiichiro.jpg

COM:FOP Japan. eien20 (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

日本の著作権法第46条本文の規定により、「屋外に設置されている銅像などの美術の著作物は、原則として自由に撮影や公表が可能」とあるためアップロードしましたが、海外の著作権法との兼ね合いから「日本の著作権法第46条」による場合はコモンズでのアップロードではなく、著作者の許可の有無に関係なく、一律に「日本語版ウィキペディアへのアップロード（解像度を下げるなどの条件を受け入れ）」を推奨している旨を、アップロード後に知りました。すいませんでした。 Photo memories 1868 (talk) 01:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinen2024.jpg

Cc-by-4.0 not mentioned, "free for use in editorial broadcast, webcast, print, online & radio reports" is not sufficient, see COM:L Timk70 (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks. I asked a contact at the European Council to add a regular license like CC-BY-4.0 at the copyright page. --- Vysotsky (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Swift answer from the European Council: "The photos published on the Newsroom are unfortunately not available under Creative Commons License"~. Vysotsky (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 7446p-W.jpg

Plik wrzuciłam przez pomyłkę, nie spełnia założeń regulaminowych konkursu. Katarzyna Gritzmann (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harry Styles Harry’s House Taiwan bus promotion.jpg

Non-free content is the subject of this photo, failing de minimis, and no FOP in Taiwan except for buildings. Wcam (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keers' face.png

Such digital art is probably out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @A1Cafel,

I have found this picture on Flickr. I made recherche upon the Backrooms. I uploaded this because it's a representation of entities in the Backrooms like this one. Jeanne Angerie (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jammu and Kashmir Awami Ittehad Party logo.png

Taken from copyrighted website https://awamiithadpartyjk.com/ Jmcgnh (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Should be OK per COM:TOO India. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had asked them physically if I am allowed to use it let me get written proof Sarim Wani (talk) 10:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon cL.svg

Irregular dimensions compared to typical BSicon files, not used in any RDT Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marais @ Paris (15190835140).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Longhorn Cattle Pioneer Plaza Dallas.JPG

I don't see how this sculpture would not be copyrighted. No freedom of panorama for copyrighted sculptures in the U.S. (There are other images of the same set of sculptures that should probably also be deleted, but I figured I'd start with the most blatant one I saw.) Jmabel ! talk 15:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yep. w:Robert Summers (artist) is alive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geometry arbelos r= 2÷3.svg

The file has to be downlaoded to be seen. The file looks flawed on the preview. The artist desires to remove the unintentional appearance. Hare Plotter (talk) 16:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pratikavm.web.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-TechAFee-270x90.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by D-Clics37 (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Origami world.jpg

low quality personal mspaint drawing, out of scape Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FPYN1178.jpg

Not informational? Saiphani02 (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHESSLIVE LOGO V.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plemiona Elfów.svg

Naruszenie praw autorskich. Zastosowany podział elfów i graficzne przedstawienie jest identyczne jak w polskich wydaniach "Silmarillionu". Posiadam takie z 1985 roku, na potrzeby tej sprawy mogę udostępnić. Kriis bis (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oskarżenia są kompletnie bezpodstawne. Tak jak zaznaczyłem to w opisie, bazowałem na Silmarillionie z 2015 roku wydawnictwa Amber (zarówno na schemacie, jak i na treści tego tytułu) i schemat w nim zawarty nie jest ani trochę podobny do mojej pracy (również mogę udostępnić), ba brakuje w nim Minyarów, Tatyarów, Nalyarów, Falmarich, Amanyarów i Avamanyarów. Bazowałem także na pliku Sundering of the Elves-en.svg, od którego również moja praca jest zupełnie inna. Następnie poprawki w schemacie nanoszone były zgodnie z dyskusją w zgłoszeniu do InM,na podstawie uwag @Chrumps, @Tar Lócesilion i Mpn Agnaton (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schemat powtarza to, co merytorycznie trzeba powtórzyć, stosuje tę samą logikę, a to nie jest chronione prawem autorskim. Rozumiem argumenty Kriisa, ale sytuację porównałbym do podobieństwa diagramów Venna - w sporym zakresie będą podobne, kiedy muszą w logiczny sposób przedstawiać to samo. Tar Lócesilion (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dokładnie, a dodatkowo, jak wspomniałem, schemat w Silmarillionie wygląda inaczej i ma niepełne dane w stosunku do mojej pracy. Agnaton (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wydanie XII, W-wa, 2006, na ostatniej stronie. Widzę grafikę podobną, ale graficznie znacznie prostszą, podpisy podobne, ale jednak inne. Ponadto rozpatrywana grafika bardziej rozbudowana. Mpn (talk) 16:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Feslecorp (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fletchermckinnel (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, self promotional images; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flight 93, September 11th, and January 6th.png

Unused, unclear COM:SCOPE, unclear source of the background image. Gikü (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cycleannimalddddd.png

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AvelTop1 (talk · contribs)

Unexplained screen shots (at least that's what it looks like) that might concern Brazil's economy, probably taken from somewhere by the looks of them (so potential copyvios), nonsensical categories. The files should be deleted as out of project scope and per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cycleannimalzzzz.png

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARVO- LOGO.png

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well COM:TOO US, so

Keep? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kyshtymskikarlan.jpg

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 17:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Momo rico.jpg

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MR gameplay.png

Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 17:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MR Main page.png

Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura Wiesböck (2022).jpg

possible copyvio https://laurawiesboeck.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Wiesb%C3%B6ck-Portrait-1a-scaled.jpg - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shelllogo.png

The logo does not meet copyright protection in the United States, but is copyrightable in its country of origin (United Kingdom). Astrinko (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Deleted before many times. Jonteemil (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vimlesh Ahirwar.jpg

Non-free newspaper Astrinko (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kijker van Kletter1.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Bertux as no permission (No permission since) Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rationale by the original tagger was: "Author of the depicted work is *not* Wikifrits but Barbara Kletter aka nl:user:Barkle. Barkle is explicitly opposed to this depiction of her work: [D]e foto's zoals deze en deze zijn voor mij inderdaad een probleem, en ik geef geen toestemming, als maker van deze beelden. (The photographs like this and this one are indeed a problem for me, and I do not give permission as the maker of these sculptures.) The work is not eligible for Freedom of Panorama as the sculpture is the only relevant object in the photograph.}}". --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Netherlands, there is freedom of Panorama. Only artworks inside (a building) are not always allowed to publish. This is nonsense.

Keep: The artist has nothing to say about work that's in public, outside, it doensn't matter if they made the artwork (sculptur). - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 19:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the last paragraph of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Netherlands#Freedom of panorama suggests there may indeed be some restrictions. However, I fail to see that this (and the other images) are affected by this. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama is not an issue here. The environment there is much larger and the Kijker is also designed for that. It is not in its natural environment and is cut too narrowly Barkle (talk) 19:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

Keep Clear keep. Freedom of panorama NL. -- Vysotsky (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama is not an issue here. The environment there is much larger and the Kijker is also designed for that. It is not in its natural environment and is cut too narrowly Barkle (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't talk BS. Photos of statues in the Netherlands have never been a problem, also when they are cropped or whatever. The deletionists have moved to Wikimedia Commons, it seems. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Let's keep this talk respectful and focused. And indeed, these images are according to the rules of Dutch copyright law, art. 18. Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clear keep. Freedom of panorama NL. -- Peli (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The chosen route of speedy deletion was a clear mistake. This is no blatant copyvio by 'stealing' an existing image and uploading it as own work. Also the picture was not made by Wikifrits but by Ceescamel. Also all of the turmoil was just about removing these images from the article about the artist on wp.nl, not about total prohibition of this kind of images. Artist commented on discussion page "Dat ze elders staan, vind ik een minder probleem" meaning 'I can live with this image being kept elsewhere' i.e. on Commons. Also despite her initial promise to come up with better pictures after taking a closer look she would not be able upload own images under the needed free license since she is bound by the rules of her copyrightpartner Pictoright. Peli (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas-dubois.jpg

Unused collage of two images, the originals are of significantly higher quality, no realistic use for this low quality version ~TheImaCow (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telugu in english.jpg

raw text, out of scope ~TheImaCow (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Glanum

Tourist boards. There is no freedom of panorama in France.

Ruthven (msg) 19:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok for me. Sorry, but I didn't notice that these photos were included in the download. Selmoval (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Je ne comprends pas très bien la raison pour laquelle cette photo ou ces photos doivent être supprimées et je voudrais bien qu'on me l'explique en français afin de ne pas commettre à nouveau l'erreur d'un téléchargement analogue. Je vous remercie par avance pour votre réponse. Thérèse Gaigé. [[Utilisateur: Thérèse Gaigé|Thérèse Gaigé]],<small>[[Discussion utilisateur:Thérèse Gaigé|discuter]]</small> (discussion) (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbara Kletter.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Bertux as no permission (No permission since) Vysotsky (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly Freedom of Panorama NL. Vysotsky (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama is not an issue here. The environment there is much larger and the Kijker is also designed for that. It is not in its natural environment and is cut too narrowly. Barkle (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sculptor wants to take control here. This photograph must stay. FoP-Nederland is very wide and open. Don't mess with the photographers here. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 10:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No doubt about applicable FOP. This deletion request is based on a misunderstanding. The sculptor ('Barkle') was not completley happy with the use of this representation of her work on wp.nl. and wanted it 'removed' (from that page). This nomination for complete removal from Commons, by speedy deletion even, is very weird. Author of the photo does not need any permission to take outdoor photos any way they like. Author of sculpture has no final say in the point of view of spectators or photographers receiving her work. In my opinion the artwork is depicted very well in its natural environment (trees and water) without any distracting people, cars, streets, numberplates, metros. Of course more of the urban context could have been shown. noisy example streetview green example streetview But sculptors should not say to photographers "move a bit to the left please", unless they pay them really well for that extra service. - Afterthoughts: 1. A renaming of the file as a Titled work of art "Sculpture Kijker by .. etc" seems desirable. Now the too short title of the image file looks too much like the title of a portrait photo. But it works well enough and has no significant meaning in a wikipage gallery, the extra info can be in the description. 2. I can understand very well that the artist is caring, but too eager self promotion is very dangerous here and should be avoided. The article could / should have more external sources. Examples of broad reception, like quotes of reviews by third parties, imho. Peli (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kijker van Kletter2.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Bertux as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: month=September|day=11|year=2024|reason=Author of the depicted work is *not* Wikifrits but Barbara Kletter aka nl:user:Barkle. Barkle is explicitly opposed to this depiction of her work: [D]e foto's zoals deze en deze zijn voor mij inderdaad een probleem, en ik geef geen toestemming, als maker van deze beelden. (The photographs like this and this one are indeed a problem for me, and I do not give permission as the maker of these sculptures.) The work is not eligible for Freedom of Panorama as the sculpture is the only relevant object in the photograph. Vysotsky (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clear keep. Freedom of panorama NL. -- Vysotsky (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Vysotsky, nonsense nominations. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zoetermeer kunstwerk schaal 1-4.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Bertux as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: month=September|day=11|year=2024|reason=Author of the depicted work is *not* Wikifrits but Barbara Kletter aka nl:user:Barkle. Barkle is explicitly opposed to this depiction of her work: [D]e foto's zoals deze en deze zijn voor mij inderdaad een probleem, en ik geef geen toestemming, als maker van deze beelden. (The photographs like this and this one are indeed a problem for me, and I do not give permission as the maker of these sculptures.) Vysotsky (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clear keep. Freedom of panorama NL. -- Vysotsky (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barkle has provided new information about the sculpture. It was completed in 1990 and has always been in the Beeldentuin achter Dorpsstraat 7 (Sculpture Garden behind Dorpsstraat 7) which has existed since 1990. According to Barkle it was not public space then.

Zoetermeer municipality states:

U kunt de tuin iedere zondag van 12:00 uur tot 16:00 uur bezoeken. Op andere dagen is de tuin gesloten voor publiek.

De beeldentuin ligt in de parkachtige achtertuin van het rijksmonument 't Oude Huis uit 1872. Voor de Open Monumentendag 1990 zijn 6 kunstwerken speciaal voor de tuin ontworpen als blijvende tentoonstelling.

This translates as:

You can visit the garden each Sunday from 12:00 am to 4:00 pm. At other days the garden is closed to the public.

The sculpture garden is in the parklike backyard of the classified monument 't Oude Huis, built in 1872. For Open Monument Day 1990 six artworks have been designed for a permanent exhibition.

Here is the Google Maps satellite image. The Google marker points to the house Dorpsstraat 7 and the artwork is just below the center of the image I presume. This garden is not visible from outside nowadays and probably was not in 1990.

So the artwork is not in public space nor can the photographer possibly have taken this image from public space. FoP cannot apply → bertux 14:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bertux, The sculpture garden is dismantled. My sculpture is waiting to be replaced. Nowadays the garden is private property. Barkle (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sculpture was not located in a public place, and now it is even a private place. 2A02:A420:25E:4DBB:606C:C48C:1DDC:B99A 16:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My Sculpture was not located in a public place, and now it is even a private place. Barkle (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ENON Trading Company Limited - logo.svg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon xtKRZ saffron.svg

wrong naming; duplicate of File:BSicon xmtKRZ saffron+.svg Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WorkItOut.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto de un volante del FLP.jpg

Spanish political poster. Text seems complex enough for a copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hyderalizaman (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janosch Harbers.jpg

Bitte löschen Janoschiha15 (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fourseatree (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ağaxanov Şamil (talk · contribs)

All of this user's files were uploaded while editing the article, they are all images from a person's life, they are not author's own work, and there is no source.

Nemoralis (talk) 22:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:El famoso muntaner.webp

Out of scope: AI-generated image of a person, unused outside a nonsense edit on frwiki which I've reverted Omphalographer (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lucascorte (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opetlogo.png

Might be above COM:TOO Turkey, which is very briefly worded. Jonteemil (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xproc-logo-new.jpg

Unlikely to be own work, however maybe freely licensed by author? Leave it to disussion. Jonteemil (talk) 23:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonteemil. You're correct in that this is not my own work. But I never claimed it was, on the XProc page it says it was created by Bethan Tovey-Walsh. She created it it to be the logo of a public, open source, standard. Usage is free. We use it everywhere in relation to XProc (talks, articles, the xproc.org website, it's even on the front page of my XProc book). I'm not sure how I can *proof* that this is the case. I could bring you in contact with Bethan? Can you help with how to do proof the image freely licensed? ErikSiegel (talk) 06:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It says Own work as source, and that is intepreted as you being the author. Please link to where it says that the work is free. Or alternatively make the author release the rights at COM:CONSENT. Jonteemil (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:V sacrifices herself.gif

Copyrighted animation from YouTube GIF Vitor Hello? 23:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial view of the Midway Trailer Park in Midway, Indiana, following the F4 tornado of April 11, 1965.jpg

This file is sourced to a past version of weather.gov, published by the US National Weather Service.

weather.gov hosts a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses).

Copyright and licensing details of such third-party files is usually set out in the image captions.

Unfortunately, this image is no longer published by the NWS on the current version of the page. The past version of the "Photos" tab contains a digital slideshow (no longer functioning) under the heading "Portrait of Disaster". The 'Summary" tab contains a long list of third-party "Credits/References", but it is not clear which (if any) of them might have been the original source of this image.

The copyright status of photos taken in the United States prior to 1989 depends on the date and context of their first publication. As a photo taken in 1965, we need this information to determine whether it's free of copyright or not.

Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) in the public domain or available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise source and evidence of permission can be found.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 23:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 02:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Colectivo Ovejas Negras.png

Possibly above COM:TOO Uruguay. Jonteemil (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Barameji2024 (talk · contribs)

Likely copyrighted.

Jonteemil (talk) 23:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anchor, Illinois, 1974 tornado vortices.png

The uploader sourced this file from the website of the US National Weather Service: https://www.weather.gov/ilx/3apr74

The photo was taken in the United States in 1974 and the NWS credits it to celebrated meteorologist w:Ted Fujita, who was an academic and not an employee of a US federal government agency.

The rationale for hosting it on the Commons has been:

a belief when the NWS general website disclaimer states that information on there site is "in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise" it necessarily means noted with a formal copyright notice, and that the absence of a formal notice accompanying an image equates to an assertion by the NWS that the image is in the public domain.
a set of terms and conditions used for a time by the NWS Sioux City office for public contributions

However:

There is nothing to connect this image with the Sioux City office (it was published by the Central Illinois office)
A recent analysis of over 200 third-party images has found that whatever the NWS intends by "specifically noted otherwise" in their disclaimer, images that are known to be protected by copyright are routinely published on NWS websites without formal copyright notices, or sometimes without any attribution at all. Very many examples exist, spanning major media outlets, photographers who claim that they never relinquished their rights to their photos, and permissions granted to the NWS in public that did not include release into the public domain. Not a single one of these was published by the NWS with a formal copyright notice.

The most likely conclusion is that the NWS does not intend "specifically noted otherwise" to mean "specifically noted with a formal copyright notice". Alternatively, if that really is the intention of those words, the NWS has deviated from this intention so thoroughly as to render the disclaimer unreliable as an assertion of public domain status.

Copyright of images taken in the United States prior to March 1, 1989 depends on the circumstances of their first publication, rather than when they were actually taken. (see COM:HIRTLE).

There are a variety of ways in which this image might already have entered the public domain via not meeting copyright formalities of the day, but these cannot simply be assumed.

Alternatively, it was first published between 1974 and 1989, and the formalities were correctly observed, this image will enter the public domain somewhere between 2070 and 2085 (95 years after publication) or if first published after March 1, 1989, then in 2059 (70 years after Fujita's death).

Without details of its first publication, we cannot assess the copyright status of this pre-1989 US image and therefore must delete it unless someone can provide this information.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – ditto per the dozens of other DRs I’ve !voted on. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 02:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luke Holmes Portrait.jpg

{{Delete |reason=Figure is not sufficiently notable and image is not contained in any page. |subpage=File:Luke Holmes Portrait.jpg |day=11 |month=September |year=2024 }} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:23EE:13E8:47BD:781F:E3CB:C5AA:12C8 (talk) 00:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reflectivedesire.com files uploaded by Alex444112

Note that all the images being nominated here are sexual in nature and one involves nudity. All of the nominated images were uploaded by User:Alex444112, who has uploaded other files from reflectivedesire.com without permission in the past, see this deletion request from 2023. To the paraphrase that nomination, there is no proof of public domain releases from the source website, and the image's upload to Commons appears to be in violation of the website's Terms of Use, specifically section 8, "Intellectual Property Rights". Thanks and take care. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 22:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]