Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/12

11 September 2024

13 September 2024

Deletion requests on 12 September 2024

September 12

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Intertoto.svg

Looks like the Italian wiki user copied it from http://www.juventus.com/media/images/internal-pages-images/coppa%20intertoto.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 17:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Intertoto.svg

In the image, I can say that it comes from this Italian Wikipedia account https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Intertoto.svg where it indicates that the drawing comes from the source http://www.juventus.com/media/images/internal-pages-images/coppa%20intertoto.jpg , also use the image on other wikipedia pages in Italian language, it would not be plagiarism but an inspiration, I hope you understand it thanks--LIBRE CONOCIMIENTO (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intertoto.svg

Very likely it is hasn't a compatible license; even if it really is "own work", the license applied is that of the logo. Stego (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's not exactly the cup (which is visible at File:Juventus FC - Coppa Intertoto UEFA 1999.jpg, and might be have copyright issues), but a version created by MacMoreno based on the cup description. --Ruthven (msg) 07:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:أراضي العائلة.jpg

bad name Alturkasma (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the name is the only issue, that's not a deletion reason. Ask for COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicholas Tartaglione.jpg

Not own work (Stuart Bayer/The Journal News via AP) CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star Box coffee & restaurant, khartoum - قهوه و مطعم استار بوك , الخرطوم.JPG

Likely not own work: small screengrab with credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"A Nautch Girl and Musicians," postcard, early 1900's.jpg

A postcard being published in the "earlier 1900's" does not imply that its author has been dead since 1954, nor that it was published before 1929. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sure looks like it was. When do you think it would have been published, with that style and seemingly hand-colored? 19th-century wouldn't surprise me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was basing this on the file's description ("A Nautch Girl and Musicians," a postcard, earlier 1900's), but it could very well be inaccurate. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 Georgian Protests, April 28 (3).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a copyrighted banner but a privately made protest banner (not a produced mass distributed banner), similarly to street graffiti of which we have tons of images. The so called "portrait" of Bidzina Ivanishvili is a drawing, similarly to graffiti drawings, and does not constitute a violation of protected works. Labrang (talk) 06:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mind you - the requester has uploaded themselves a few closeup photos of protest banners of the same event, a few minutes prior to this deletion request. See for example File:Protest Tbilisi 21 April 2024 (53987798696).jpg at 3:42. Labrang (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ержан Хозеевич Казыханов.jpg

questionable copyright status; image appears elsewhere on the Internet Malik Nursultan B (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazykhanov and Trump.jpg

questionable copyright status; image appears elsewhere on the Internet and the fact that this image was made by a US official is not proven; no link provided Malik Nursultan B (talk) 03:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TD 20190613 0035.jpg

questionable copyright status; image appears elsewhere on the Internet Malik Nursultan B (talk) 03:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmet-7.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia, artist Sadri Akhun died in 1990 A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cambridge Street, Allston, Feb 9 2013 (53225594674).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was a mural funded by the City Of Boston Mayor's Mural crew on a building that will be demolished imminently. Do we wish it to be lost to history? Who owns the rights in this case? It is a public art piece. Ethanmlong (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I visited this spot yesterday and this municipal mural has been removed as the building is about to be demolished. Ethanmlong (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johannes Kemetter.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Känguru1890 as no permission (No permission since) Krd 04:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:স্বাধিকার থেকে স্বাধীনতা মঞ্চ 2.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Tanbiruzzaman as no permission (No permission since) Krd 04:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Harvard Square Movie Theater (53231770952).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The business has been closed for over a decade with eventual plans to get rid of the mural. Uploaded for documentation purposes, as it is a Harvard Square landmark. Ethanmlong (talk) 13:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gonfalone Comune Montebuono.PNG

This file was initially tagged by Arrow303 as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 04:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turtle Cove mural - Roger Witter.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the actual license tags? It has nothing to do with FOP, it was made by someone employed by the Bureau of Land Management and uploaded by them. FunkMonk (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turtle Cove mural - Roger Witter (Miohippus & Mesocyon).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

San Alfonso del Mar

Gallery doppelt; Category:San Alfonso del Mar ist besser AQ (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ryan4likes (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GKS-Logo-Web.jpg

Das Wappen wurde doch nicht von einer Stiftung gestaltet? Wer ist die natürliche Person, die es entworfen hat? Wer hat das Copyright? GerritR (talk) 05:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KakaoTalk Photo 2024-09-12-13-36-27.jpg

wrong name Boscolee93 (talk) 05:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read COM:File renaming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Houda Taxi - panoramio.jpg

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Проспект Победы - panoramio.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 06:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Дорога к микрорайону - panoramio.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 06:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DM. Billboard can be blurred. Olksolo (talk) 17:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:神奈川県厚木市松枝 - panoramio.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 06:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara 2008 - panoramio.jpg

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bánh Oreo.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oreo Tower..jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Game & Watch Collection cartridge.jpg

Probably exceeded COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no copyright The New Foxy (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:เหรียญชัยสมรภูมิทั้ง4.jpg

Copied from website Karizaki sign (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not original and is claimed to be my own work. Karizaki sign (talk) 06:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medal เหรียญกล้าหาญ ร.ก. (โลหะขาว).png

Copy modified files, modify lights, copy modified files, modify files. Karizaki sign (talk) 06:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oreo Churros sign, Disneyland, Anaheim, Orange County, California, USA.jpg

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Semen Indonesia logo (svg).svg

Semen Indonesia company underwent a rebranding in 2020, changing its name from Semen Indonesia to SIG. This rebranding included a new logo. The logo currently on Wikimedia is no longer relevant as Semen Indonesia now has a new logo. Muhammad Ali Awsath (talk) 06:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No deletion reason. Commons does not try to erase history. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ... it's called history. --Mateus2019 (talk) 04:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Diego Rivera & Frida Kahlo Studio

I am afraid but we will have to delete these photos because they depict protected artworks and photographs displayed in a private museum, where freedom of panorama does not apply.

Gnom (talk) 06:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The Museo Casa Estudio Diego Rivera y Frida Kahlo is a government run museum, which means these should be allowable under Mexico's liberal freedom of panorama law (see COM:FOP Mexico). IronGargoyle (talk) 22:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The museum is not a lugar publico (public place), as it charges a fee to enter. Gnom (talk) 07:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see evidence there that fee charging restricts something from being a public place. One of the points includes "every kind of building used for education" (emphasis mine) which a museum would qualify as. While COM:FOP Mexico notes that some government places (like train stations) restrict photography, this sounds very much like a non-copyright restriction. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A museum, albeit public, is not a lugar publico within the meaning of the Mexican copyright act. You are quoting from the definition in the Mexican telecommunications act, which does not apply to copyright law. Gnom (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You offer no evidence that "lugar publico" is defined differently in Mexican copyright law vs Mexican telecommunications law and it would be a very unusual case if it was. Beyond that, COM:FOP Mexico says that "Government-owned places...have no restrictions against freedom of panorama." before the telecommunications law is even brought up as an extra bit of information. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A lugar publico is a place that can be freely accessed by anyone. Lacking any better sources, this is how we interpret this term all across Commons. This requirement is not fulfilled for museums that charge an entrance fee. Gnom (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No this is absolutely not "how we interpret this term all across Commons"; that's absurd. "Lacking any better sources" is the phrase to note in your reply, as you continue to lack sources. US law for example treats public places very broadly, including places which charge admission and it seems clear from the plain wording of Commons policy that Mexico does the same. I think you are overgeneralizing from other countries which follow a more restrictive interpretation of public places. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faromentor.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside talkpage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Encarguelo (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interior Puskesmas Pasar Minggu.jpg

Turns out, it's illegal to take a picture inside the clinic. Rantemario (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Младший лейтенант Гослов Родион.jpg

Photoshopped Ryan Gosling as Russian soldier; out of scope and copyright violation. Grawiton (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUSHQ-LOGO-1.png

Uploaded as own work, but this is clearly a corporate logo DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it is edited as this is organization logo Tayyab121 (talk) 07:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:TOO Pakistan is a red link, so who knows what it is? This is a pretty highly decorated logo, so it's unlikely to be under whatever standard they might have, if any. In any case, I think it's above COM:TOO US, easily. So

Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reza.Haddadian 01.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see https://www.irna.ir/news/84342573/%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AC%DB%8C-%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AD%DA%A9%D9%85-%DA%A9%D9%85%DB%8C%D8%AA%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B6%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B7%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%B3%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%BE%D8%A7
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the hit-site obviously does not claim it as own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finish foto 2024 R4C.jpg

copyvio from https://ride4change.webflow.io// and used for promotion on nl-wiki also privacy violation minors Hoyanova (talk) 07:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:سليم عبدالغنى.jpg

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Фото Логойда Л.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Iwaqarhashmi as no source (No source since) Krd 07:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Self-portrait. Camera iPhone 13 Pro. Hands are visible. And look at the eyes: they have a camera display. --Микола Василечко (talk) 10:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Микола Василечко, Taken from iPhone 13 Pro. メイド理世 (talk) 15:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sodium trichloroacetate3D.png

Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 23:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sodium trichloroacetate3D.png

Incorrect 3D model of sodium trichloroacetate. The salt should be displayed with a crystal structure rather than just drawing the cations and anion next to each other. In addition, the image is a composite of fragments from uncited sources. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused, not the right type of showing a salt, and sodium isn't even in the right place. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penis with ring.jpg

More of these than wedding rings. Com:Penis 186.172.147.89 08:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sporocilo.jpg

Likely copyright violation - cover of a book by the publisher Progresija (see info), no evidence of permission. — Yerpo ^Eh? 09:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per COM:BOOK. I have removed the file from the page it was used on. A09 (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo Susanna.png

Erreur de mise en page Susanna.dorhage (talk) 09:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amsterdam Condolences for Alexey Navalny.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 09:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upper Nikozi clinic (51570492457).jpg

Derivative work of copyrighted works Labrang (talk) 09:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amsterdam Condolences for Alexey Navalny 2.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 09:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upper Nikozi clinic (51571980714).jpg

Derivative work of copyrighted works Labrang (talk) 09:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upper Nikozi clinic (51571298406).jpg

Derivative work of copyrighted works Labrang (talk) 09:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RuthSelfPortrait.png

If it's a self-portrait by the late Ruth Rogers-Altmann, who died in 2015, a permission by her (resp. her heirs) is required and it's not "own work" by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Yann (talk) 22:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upper Nikozi clinic (51571298231).jpg

Pictures random people, random cars, no object of interest in image, also not the claimed clinic. No particular value Labrang (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Christa Gabriel

Unfortunately stamps of Germany are copyrighted per the normal term for other types of works and the artist of these stamps, Christa Gabriel, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Evelyne Bobbe

Unfortunately stamps of Germany are copyrighted per the normal term for other types of works and at least one of the artists of these stamps, Evelyne Bobbe, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Thomas Serres

Unfortunately stamps of Germany are copyrighted per the normal term for other types of works and the artist of these stamps, Thomas Serres, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 08 03 Hermann Schulze-Delitzsch.jpg: The portrait was published in 1849 (see File:Hermann Schulze (Delitzsch).JPG) and is the in public domain. The rest of the design is below the threshold of originality. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Deutsche Fußball-Länderspiele Briefmarke 2008.jpg: The photograph is from 1908 and is considered to be in the public domain (see de:Datei:Deutsche Fussball-Nationalmannschaft erstes Laenderspiel_1908.jpg). The rest of the design is below the threshold of originality. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's still the design of the rest of the stamp outside of the photograph. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DPAG 2009 Theodor Heuss.jpg: The photograph is from the 1950s. The photographer seems to be unknown. The rest of the design is below the threshold of originality. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I assume it would be copyrighted then? --Adamant1 (talk) 08:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, probably. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JosefinAsplundVikings .jpg

Per this interview on 11 September 2024 with Swedish channel TV4 [1] actress Josefin Asplund ask how an image she uploaded to instagram ended up on Wikipedia, as she did not do this herself. Thus I nominate this image for deletion as is a copyvio. QubeCube (talk) 09:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacking a reliable VRTS ticket, this seems like a copyvio. Julle (talk) 09:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Worth noting is also that she claims that the Instagram post was deleted from and that the image was uploaded by a user named Josefine Asplund which she thus claims isn't her. --Sabelöga (talk) 11:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Corinna Rogger

Unfortunately stamps of Germany are copyrighted per the normal term for other types of works and the artist of these stamps, Corinna Rogger, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BRI Manajemen Investasi.svg

Logo ini tidak sesuai dengan logo aslinya dari perusahaan PT BRI Manajemen Investasi 103.113.135.18 09:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems that the logo has been revised to match the original source (https://bri-mi.co.id/). So, the argument regarding it becomes moot and needs to be declined eventually. 2404:8000:1037:456:E81E:2678:53C4:3A22 10:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Charlotte Schneider

Unfortunately stamps of Germany are copyrighted per the normal term for other types of works and the artist of these stamps, Charlotte Schneider, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years since the stamps were made in 1962. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Alexander Osolin

Unfortunately stamps of Germany are copyrighted per the normal term for other types of works and the artist of these stamps, Alexander Osolin, seems to still be alive or at least hasn't been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first two are not stamps of Germany, Keep per COM:Russia#Stamps. --Quick1984 (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly I don't know how that work since all three stamps have the same design and published at the same time. So I have no clue what the original country of publication would be in that case. I just assumed the copyright would default to Germany but who knows. I'm fine leaving it up to whomever closes this. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariah Carey Library of Congress 2023 2.jpg

Scaled-down dupe of File:Mariah Carey Library of Congress 2023 (53600169902).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pastoor van Arskerk Den Haag (1.1).jpg

Scan from a book or other publication (see EXIF). As it's an aerial image, it's highly unlikely that the uploader has made this photo themself. Spinster (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pastoor van Arskerk Den Haag (01).jpg

Scan from a book or other publication (see EXIF). As it's an aerial image, it's highly unlikely that the uploader has made this photo themself. Spinster (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariah Carey (1995) and Anna Nalick (2010) (5362739155).jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted photo A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pastoor van Arskerk Den Haag (02).jpg

Scan from a book or other publication (see EXIF). No source pointing towards which publication, and no evidence that the uploader is indeed the photographer. Spinster (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Konrad Przewieslik

Unfortunately German stamps are copyrighted per the normal term and the artist of these stamps, Konrad Przewieslik, died in 1994. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2065.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Stamps by Walter Rahm

Unfortunately German stamps are copyrighted per the normal term of 70+ years after the artist's death and the artist of these stamps, Walter Rahm, died in 1987. So these images are copyrighted until at least 2058.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Never mind. Can an admin close this as keep? I realized they were published in 1966 and don't have the artist name on them. So they qualify as PD. My bad. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024.07.08 김일성 추모 30돐 김정은.png

Appears to be a screenshot, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Light (20679047751).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chausath Yogini Temple at Ranipur Jharial, Bolangir District, Odisha.jpg

I want to change the license রবিরশ্মি রায় (talk) 10:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three minor shrines in the Chausath Yogini Temple complex at Ranipur Jharial, Bolangir District, Odisha.jpg

I want to change the license রবিরশ্মি রায় (talk) 10:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To what new license? You can add another one to the already existing. Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to change the license from CC-BY-SA to CC-BY রবিরশ্মি রায় (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You just need to add the new license to the template: {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0|cc-by-4.0}} It is always good to keep the older version, so users can choose the license that fits their needs best. Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so can I simply undo the deletion request? রবিরশ্মি রায় (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have found out how to undo. Thanks. রবিরশ্মি রায় (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Protest Tbilisi 21 April 2024 (53987798696).jpg

Copyrighted derivated is still visible in history - meanwhile, the blurred part to circumvent copyrights takes away the entire [political] message of the banner. This is useless crap this way. Labrang (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this image BUT the initial version from "03:42, 12 September 2024" shall be deleted. --Msb (talk) 16:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, with the blurred object the entire political message has been damaged. There is no value for it, not even "educational value", unless you want to keep it for Georgian language training. I mean really, just delete the photo why keep (political activism) photos that miss the point? Nobody is going to use this photo this way anyways, especially since third parties can just use the unedited and undamaged file directly from Flickr, so why would you want to keep it? It's not even valuable for archiving and history purposes just in case I delete the Flickr original. You guys are really funny. Just delete it. Tons of images are deleted every day, what would be so special to keep this? Why would you want to hang on to it? There are plenty of protest photos by now in this category.Labrang (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I maintain that even if the small detail of that poster (it is actually not a banner) has been removed, it is suitable for illustrating the protests there satisfyingly. After all, the protest poster was photographed in such a way that it is shown in the overall setting of the protest: surrounding buildings, protest poster and, above all, other protesters.

It should also be noted that deleting the original version does not mean that the image material is lost forever on Commons. It can be easily restored in the future once the copyright has expired.

BTW: It's not a good idea to verbally attack someone if they disagree with you. -- Msb (talk) 16:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, nobody is going to use this photo this way (I can predict that and I think you actually are aware of that as well), so why would one maintain the desire to keep it here if an element in the original would violate the rules and cannot simply be cropped out. Rules that are odd in the first place, as anyone in the world can and will use the original from Flickr with the so-called copyrighted element. Of course I won't start a discussion about the rules, that's out of place here, but just to highlight how ~~silly~~ odd it is to rather blur parts to maintain the photo here for rules sake. Nobody will use it. Why cling on to it? What's the big deal?

The sole reason this photo was uploaded to Commons in the first place was because the uploader applied this very same rule to another photo a few minutes prior and then hastily mass-uploaded photos from the same Flickr album without looking properly, ignoring the rules "they" just applied to a photo they nominated for deletion. I, as ~~owner~~ creator of the photo, would not have uploaded this one, and had to point out the rules "they" applied to another photo of the same series minutes earlier. Only after that "they" backtracked and edited hours later the photo, just so they can cling on to a photo. While I am happy enough to see photos deleted if they don't qualify, I see here people who hang on to it like it is something they own and never want to let go, and rather dismember the "artwork" of the protester.

This really is becoming comedic and totally silly. That is not verbally attacking anyone personally here. It's this way of dealing with requests of the ~~owners~~ creators of the original photo that I wonder whether I should contribute to Commons my photos that you (plural, not insult) value so much apparently. I mean, it's just a matter of notching the license slightly just so that it can be used everywhere in the world freely except here.Labrang (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as OP. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Decisiones Sacrae Rotae Romanae coram r. p. domino Hieronymo Crispo. Tomus primus.pdf

Il titolo è errato e non corrisponde al contenuto del file caricato IlariaCatanzaro (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We change the title, not delete. --RAN (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Can you replace the word "primus" with the word "secundus"? In this way the title would be correct. IlariaCatanzaro (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much IlariaCatanzaro (talk) 06:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to help! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Funnel cloud east of Salina, Kansas April 14, 2011 (2).jpg

This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.

Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses).

Copyright and licensing details of such third-party files is usually set out in the image captions.

Unfortunately, this image is no longer published by the NWS, and the only source information provided here is the URL of the image itself; we no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.

Because we cannot verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise source and evidence of permission can be found.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 10:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 17:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:My photo 99.jpg

No reason to keep this, seem to just be an normal photo of a normal dude. This file is used in Wikidata (Q125984752) where it's also requested to be deleted. Kakan spelar (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exlibris - Bucheignerzeichen 1925 (139400451).jpg

The exlibris image seen on this page of a German book is a work by Oskar Graf, who died in 1958. So it is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be either deleted or a new version without the image uploaded (and the original version then deleted or hidden). The original version can be restored in 2029. Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sitaram Yechury in Kolkata.jpg

Clearly not a free image. Indopug (talk) 11:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per COM:F1 -- DaxServer (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exlibris - Bucheignerzeichen 1925 (139400366).jpg

The exlibris image seen on the upper right of this page from a German book is a work by Käthe Olshausen-Schönberger, who died in 1967. So it is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be either deleted or a new version without the image uploaded (and the original version then deleted or hidden). The original version can be restored in 2038. Rosenzweig τ 11:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exlibris - Bucheignerzeichen 1925 (139400385).jpg

The exlibris images seen on this page from a German book are works by Marcus Behmer, who died in 1958. So it is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be either deleted or a new version without the image uploaded (and the original version then deleted or hidden). The original version can be restored in 2029. Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sodium pantothenate3D.png

Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 23:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ball-and-stick and calotte models absolutely need to have an accurate geometry and size of atoms. Otherwise, they are misleading like in this case. Hence, still Delete. --Leyo 22:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sodium pantothenate3D.png

Low quality image, the reason: "Different size of atoms of the same element + 3D model of salt as a cation+anion." Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The oxygen nearest to the sodium also looks badly cropped. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Alfa-ketosav, as usual for this uploader's low-3D-quality and graphical composites of uncited originals. And likewise:

File:Potassium pantothenate3D.png

DMacks (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VitamineB5.png

Only used on a user subpage, and has colored chemical symbols and halves of bonds. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Neidhardt, der blitzschnelle (talk · contribs)

Most have no exif data, those who have all show different camera models, one has author information with no relation to the uploader. One file uploaded by this user is not nominated here because author information was changed via ticket.

Krd 11:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JupiterccnetcomSN2.jpg

Low quality image now unused. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Westerland (Sylt)

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Henry Gundlach, who died in 1964. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2035.

Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ДАЖО 118-03d-0050. 1850. Ревізькі казки сіл Старокостянтинівського повіту Волинської губернії.pdf

1GB PDF file which seem to be corrupt. Please reupload corrected version and lets delete this one Jarekt (talk) 12:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is opened and downloaded from the territory of Ukraine and Poland without problems. Is the problem something else? TarasSemV (talk) 13:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1210671.jpg-Logo Orchideenwelt.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the sculpture is modern. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seedaaa.jpg

Copy Movie poster Karizaki sign (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Croatia P8206436 (3980195408).jpg

In my opinion the photo has no educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acetorphine.svg

Wrong double bond geometry. We have File:Acetorphine structure.svg that is a correct version. Marbletan (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear that it can only be cis (that's your complaint, i suppose), so it does not matter that it is drawn like trans for better style. I don't know what my sources have been 7 years ago, but there are still much drawings of Acetorphine around like this. Itu (talk) 06:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep despite appearing as incorrect alkene geometry, but add note to the image-description page about it (and maybe rename too, for clarity). This seems to be an unfortunately a common way of drawing alkene-bridged cyclic structures, especially in morphine-type structures in some contexts. DMacks (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General comment: trans-style in rings is a general topic. There should be an overview page for this instead of handling it only in individual deletion requests. --Itu (talk) 06:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museo d´Arte Medioevale e Moderna (Padova) jm56483.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the sculpture is modern. Per file:Museo d´Arte Medioevale e Moderna (Padova) jm56484.jpg this is 1969 sculpture. I suspect sculptor Nereo Petenello's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schlieper-Poster-1990.jpg

possible copyvio © Carl Schlieper, Solingen - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 Tour de France Femmes.svg

There's an improved version available. Both versions are fresh from the Map workshop, with no File usage on other wikis. I'm new to this, next time I might test how the image looks on a temporary page, in order to save you some time... Groetjes, Peter (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A tornado near Dryden on June 2, 2023.jpg

The image is published on the NWS website in this document: https://www.weather.gov/media/maf/events/2023/June%202nd%20Write%20Up.pdf (page 5)

I reached out to the creator, who confirmed that:

they had never transferred their rights to the image by sale or placed in the public domain
they permit the NWS to use their images internally

When I asked them if they'd be open to releasing the image into the Public Domain for Wikimedia to use, they replied

"No [...] They can never steal it "

I think we should delete this, and urgently.

Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request.

Rlandmann (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete – again pinging some administrators over here on this @Jmabel @Matrix @Yann Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 17:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will further ping the following weather editors and frequent commenters: @WeatherWriter @Hurricanehink @Ks0stm @ChessEric @Sir MemeGod @Berchanhimez @Consigned @GeorgeMemulous; trying to quickly facilitate a discussion to get a clear consensus. Two participants probably isn’t a good enough consensus. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 22:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather be criticized for pinging ten different people into the conversation (with neutral intent); than to be accused of requesting unilateral deletion. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 22:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Going to add @ChrisWx since he has started commenting on discussions. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 23:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Based on the answer, although I would like to see the source for it. ChessEric (talk) 02:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This conversation happened in a messaging app, so that won't be possible in this case. --Rlandmann (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by InfinitiBowie97 (talk · contribs)

User has previously implied that they were uploading images of this basketball player without permission from the photographers. No source cited.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Not understanding what the issue is here now. I spoke with other admin previously about errors made when uploading images of Darnell. These images on the current page are works of my own, which I was told I am allowed to upload. What other source would I need to provide if these images are my own self works? InfinitiBowie97 (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've been notified that three of the images I uploaded onto Darnell's page have been wrongfully flagged for deletion. I will start by saying that I do know Darnell personally and have taken images of him in the past and recently with my iPhone. I uploaded and shared this info under own works for each image. Previously when I first created this page, I did discuss with other with other Wiki admin that the images I was originally using derived from other news sources, as I did not understand Wiki's image upload practices at the time, and simply thought I was able to just cite the work, not knowing that I had to receive explicit permission. Once Wiki's admins explained the process to me, I sought and received permissions to use two photos that I uploaded onto Commons (these are two FDU photos that I received explicit permission from and have been communicated to Wiki Permissions via email from the copyright holder). However, the three images currently uploaded are own works I have taken myself recently and previously. I initially did not use those as I originally did not feel they were of great quality - however, I decided to upload the old ones and the new one I recently took of him in August after Wiki admin said I can upload own works. How can I remove the deletion request from the three photos currently on his page? Thanks! InfinitiBowie97 (talk) 02:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete. The other photographs of Darnell Edge are in the enwiki article. Krok6kola (talk) 23:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Ensign of the Solomon Islands (1947-1956).svg

This file has been superseded by a better one, so I recommend deleting it quickly. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Ensign of the Solomon Islands (1956-1966).svg

This file has been replaced by a better one, so I recommend deleting it quickly. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 14:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Ensign of the Solomon Islands (1966-1977).svg

This flag is a purely fictitious imaginary flag and there is no source to suggest that the Solomon Islands Red Ensign removed the white disc in 1966. I therefore recommend that it be removed promptly. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vue aérienne du centre ville de Drumettaz.jpg

Violation de copyright c/c du site : https://www.drumettaz-clarafond.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/drumettaz-drone.jpg B-noa (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Familiada Tablica.png

Likely copyvio; appears to be a screenshot from a Polish game show. Uploaded as own work. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 14:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alina Eberstaller.jpg

possible copyvio © Daniel Gressler - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Abulkhair Khan.jpg

This, most definitely, is not their work. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 15:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevin Bisbangian.png

Own work? 200.39.139.25 15:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevin Bisbangian.jpg

Date:Not applicable. Is this an own work? 200.39.139.25 15:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Purplefall.gif

Likely a derivative of a copyrighted GIF, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Redblossoms.gif reppop^talk 15:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tongi graffiti 6.jpg

Copyrightable icon visible in art. Also no FoP for 2d art in Bangladesh Wasiul Bahar (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Under the Copyright Act, 2000 of Bangladesh, photographing and publishing images of graffiti that are permanently situated in public places or accessible premises does not constitute copyright infringement. According to Section 72(20), the act allows for the making or publishing of paintings, drawings, engravings, or photographs of sculptures or other artistic works that are permanently displayed in public spaces or accessible premises. This provision is an application of the "freedom of panorama," ({{FoP-Bangladesh}}) as long as they are considered paintings, drawings, or other forms of artistic craftsmanship and are permanently situated in publicly accessible locations. —MdsShakil (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, those apps icons are already available on Wikimedia Commons so there are no violations. —MdsShakil (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MdsShakil Please check sec. 72(20) and also sec. 36(c) under sec. 2 Wasiul Bahar (talk) 17:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Upon reviewing Section 72(20) of the Copyright Act, 2000, it indeed states that photographing and publishing artistic works, including those permanently situated in public spaces, is allowed under the freedom of panorama. This includes paintings, drawings, engravings, and photographs, provided that they are permanently displayed in accessible public spaces.

Regarding Section 36(c) under Section 2, it defines "artistic work" to include “any other work of artistic craftsmanship”. Graffiti would likely fall under this category if considered a form of artistic craftsmanship, which strengthens the argument that graffiti permanently situated in public spaces is covered under the freedom of panorama exception.

Therefore, both Section 72(20) and Section 36(c) support the claim that graffiti, as an artistic work permanently displayed in a public place, can be photographed and published without infringing copyright. —MdsShakil (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MdsShakil A small misinterpretation happening with the provisions of the 2000 act.

The act explicitly allows per section 72(20) “The making or publishing of painting, drawing, engraving or photograph of a sculpture or other artistic work falling under [only] section 36(c), [...].” The section 36(c) of provision 2 includes any other artistic craftsmanship, excluding "a painting, a sculpture, a drawing (including a diagram, map, chart or plan), an engraving or a photograph whether or not any such work possesses artistic quality;" [36(a)] and "a work of architecture;" [36(b)]. However FoP for any derivative works for architectures [36(b)] are granted per section 72(19), therefore leaving no FoP for any artistic works falling under 36(a) of provision 2 (only excluding sculptures) wherever they are, even in the open place or a place having public access. There was a previous discussion regarding the status of graffiti inside Bangladesh in an undeletion request which can be found here. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MdsShakil. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 10:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TuhinShahabuddin (talk · contribs)

No indication of any free license in source site.

–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 15:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GD 廣東 ZS 中山市 Zhongshan 石岐 ShiQi 興中廣場 Central Power Plaza mall September 2024 R12S 64.jpg

There no FoP for 2D works in China メイド理世 (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:深圳的豬腳飯1.jpg

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Меморіал директору.jpg

No FoP in Ukraine Микола Василечко (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capture d'écran 2024-08-13 191100.png

Merci de bien vouloir supprimer cette image elle a était posté par erreur et elle m'apporte des soucis au quotidien. Beutfun (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian Scherrer.jpg

possible copyvio https://christianscherrer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/profile-christian-scherrer.jpg - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ben-Eliyahu.png

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 16:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:U S Embassy Nairobi (4556727099).jpg

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Marcio Luiz Fugivara Salomé (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burkaygourmand.jpg

Copyvio; Profile picture on X. The Emptiness Machine (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC) https://x.com/Meleklerin_Payi/status/1705495309399257341 The Emptiness Machine (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:𫷡-bronse-spring.svg

ファイルネームの誤り AggregatibacterActinomycetemcomitans (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ファイルネームの誤り AggregatibacterActinomycetemcomitans (talk) 04:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darth Nihilus.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Obvious derivative work of copyrighted character. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salazar Slytherin.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a derivative, simply an illustration based on some literary work instead of on some image of the character. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Davy Jones (Humano).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morgoth - Melkor.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a derivative, simply an illustration based on some old literary work instead of on some image of the character. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Líder supremo Snoke.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darth Plagueis el Sabio.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Annatar, Lord of Gifts.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a derivative, simply an illustration based on some old literary work instead of on some image of the character. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Obito-Zetsu.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Héctor Barbossa.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harley Quinn retrato.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:S. Snape.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is it looks a lot like the character in the movie, isn't this a fan art derivative then Prototyperspective (talk) 23:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid Games Week, Star Wars, Battlefront, partida, Madrid, España, 2015.JPG

copyrighted game to substantial to be de minimis. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahsoka Tano.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rey Brujo de Angmar.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative work of copyrighted characters King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a derivative, simply an illustration based on some old literary work instead of on some image of the character. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MrPuyal.png

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RiasTech (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fabseen (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TECHNATIUM-LOGO (1).jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rmitltd (talk · contribs)

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ButeCarl (talk · contribs)

Zweifel an der Angabe "Eigenes Werk". Möglicherweise eins zu eins Übernahmen aus einem der folgenden Bücher:

Star Wars, Technisches Handbuch, 1. Auflage Oktober 1996, ISBN 3-931670-03-1.
Star Trek, Die Technik der U.S.S. Enterprise, HEEL-Verlag, ISBN 3-89365-397-X.
Perry Rhodan, Terranische Raumschiffe – Risszeichnungen, Verlag Erich Pabel-Artur Moewig KG, ISBN 3-8118-2061-3.
Lexikon Raumfahrt, Heinz Mielke, transpres VEB Verlag für Verkehrswesen Berlin, 6. Auflage 1980, VLN 162-925/139/80, LSV 3877.

siehe Artikelentwurf de:Benutzer:ButeCarl/Bordenergieversorgung. Der Entwurf und diese Grafiken wurden gemeinsam erstellt.

@ButeCarl: : Woher kommen diese Grafiken genau? Hast du sie wirklich selbst gezeichnet? Bei 1:1 Übernahmen aus Büchern sind es möglicherweise Urheberrechtsverletzungen.

Zaccarias (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC) Das sind alles meine von mir entworfenen Zeichnungen, ob du das glaubst oder nicht ist irrelevant. Ich habe diese Bilder mit einem CAD Programm selber konstruiert![reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ButeCarl (talk · contribs)

Might be derivative work of copyrighted ship design.

File:Starwars Ringraumer3 13.09.2019.png

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ales Vymyslicky's Brief Introduction to The Theory of Special Relativity.pdf

Out of scope: plain text; claim of own work is also difficult to reconcile with the fact that this is obviously a scan of a printed document. Omphalographer (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scheer disco.webp

impsonation, is not the person portrayed, used for cyberbullying on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 17:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BUGWUFlierPride.jpg

Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for posters in the US. Permission from the union sent via VTRS would be needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea, damn :( thanks for letting me know about this Pacamah (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:582 in balanced ternary.jpg

Unused formula, formulas should be used within TeX format ~TheImaCow (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 백근영 (talk · contribs)

Unused low quality math formulas, raw text is out of scope, w:en:Help:TEX should be used instead.

~TheImaCow (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gehacker.jpg

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crónicas de Sanmao.jpg

The uploader cannot have the rights to release the illustration under a free license because it was drawn by Zhang Leping. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ellada İlyasqızı.jpg

Şəkilin yerləşdiyi məqalə silinib. Zəhmət olmasa şəkilin özünü də silərdiniz. TahirGuliyev (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinz Piontek.jpg

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung, zum einen sollen der Urheber und die abgebildete Peron identisch sein, es handelt sich aber zweífellos nicht um ein -Selfie, um anderen wird nicht klar, welches Recht der Hochlader hat, dieses Foto hochzuladen und unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen

Obvious mislicensing, on the one hand the author and the person depicted are supposed to be identical, but it is undoubtedly not a selfie, on the other hand it is not clear what right the uploader has to upload this photo and place it under a CC licence Lutheraner (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto wurde dem Autor von Anton Hirner zum Upload zur Verfügung gestellt. Anton Hirner verwahrt die Nutzungsrechte sämtlicher Werke von Heinz Piontek.

Weitere Informationen unter https://heinz-piontek.de/impressum Webulrich (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rahd.jpg

Low-quality duplicate (photo from computer screen) of File:Saint Adalbert of Prague pleads with Boleslaus II, Duke of Bohemia, for the release of Christians slaves by their masters, Jewish merchants, Gniezno Door ca. 1170.png Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Рахдониты.jpg

Low-quality duplicate (photo from computer screen) of File:Saint Adalbert of Prague pleads with Boleslaus II, Duke of Bohemia, for the release of Christians slaves by their masters, Jewish merchants, Gniezno Door ca. 1170.png Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Картина Франческо Айеца «Разрушение Иерусалимского храма».jpg

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:(Venice) La distruzione del tempio di Gerusalemme -Francesco Hayez - gallerie Accademia Venice.jpg Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Разрушение Иерусалимского Храма. Франческо Хайес, 1867Разрушение Иерусалимского Храма. Франческо Хайес, 1867.jpg

Unused very low-resolution duplicate of File:(Venice) La distruzione del tempio di Gerusalemme -Francesco Hayez - gallerie Accademia Venice.jpg Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Разрушение Храма.png

Unused very low-resolution duplicate of File:(Venice) La distruzione del tempio di Gerusalemme -Francesco Hayez - gallerie Accademia Venice.jpg Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Разрушение Иерусалимского Храма. Франческо Хайес, 1867.jpg

Low-resolution duplicate of File:(Venice) La distruzione del tempio di Gerusalemme -Francesco Hayez - gallerie Accademia Venice.jpg Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 DR. JULIO QUEIROZ CANDIDATO VICE-PREFEITO RJ SAO PEDRO DA ALDEIA TSE (190001933508).jpg

file name swaps KakuLogia+ (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Umaima al-Baghdadi.png

License and author are not in correspondence. Lymantria (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Синагога «Келе-Нумаз» в Дербенте.jpg

Very likely copyright violation: cropped version of https://stmegi.com/upload/iblock/b3a/b3a56452c67ad04ddce56d42fa691f1e.jpg (second image in the gallery at https://stmegi.com/gorskie_evrei/posts/43537/sinagoga/), dated 2015 (archieved since 2021, a year before this upload). Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pery Broad - Auschwitz trial (1964).jpg

This file was already kept in 2016, but it was a procedural keep because of an unwieldy DR. So there is no impediment for a new nomination.

The file was transferred here in 2014 from en.wp, where it was uploaded in 2010 and is still available today as en:File:Perybroad.jpg. It was uploaded there by en:User:Anthraxx56@yahoo.com, who uploaded (at least) three files there, see en:Special:ListFiles/Anthraxx56@yahoo.com. All with a similar credit, Pic by Ryza Jane, BSPSYCH or Pic by Ryza Jane, BSPSYCH grad or Pic by R.J.M, BSPsych. It is completely unclear who this Ryza Jane person is or was and why User:Anthraxx56@yahoo.com would be authorized to upload images provided (?) or taken (?) by this person to en.wp under Creative Commons licenses.

This photo is claimed to have been "photographed in the 60's or 70's". It looks like it was scanned from somewhere. Without more information about source, time, place, author etc. we cannot determine the copyright status of this photo other than that it is apparently not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. So the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to actually be in the public domain or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 20:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Channel Logo.jpg

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karl Fritzsch at Auschwitz.jpg

The file was transferred here in 2008 from en.wp, where it had been uploaded by en:User:Anthraxx56@yahoo.com with a credit Pic by Ryza Jane Maranan, BSPSYCH 3rd yr. And again: It is completely unclear who this Ryza Jane person is or was and why User:Anthraxx56@yahoo.com would be authorized to upload images provided (?) or taken (?) by this person to en.wp under Creative Commons licenses.

Without more information about source, time, place, author etc. we cannot determine the copyright status of this photo other than that it is apparently not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. So the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to actually be in the public domain or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 20:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two other Ryza Jane files were already deleted many years ago, see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:KAEichmann RyzaJaneMPics.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wilhlem Boger RhyzMarananPix.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Locherber skin 01.webp

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old map of Trenton, Ontario (52979205104).jpg

I uploaded this 1913 image. I don't want to see it deleted. I was puzzled as to why it triggered a blacklist ban. Geo Swan (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked this flickr contributors other images. The first 100 or so are all clearly PD due to age.
I suspect someone was overzealous with that blacklist. Geo Swan (talk) 20:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernie mayor.jpg

"This is the guy"?! 186.175.45.220 20:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iosif II.jpg

It's a lower quality copy of File:Portrait of Emperor Joseph II in military uniform.jpg Ecummenic (talk) 20:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caribana Toronto 2015 (20416869330).jpg

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license ... this robot thinks it should over-ride human judgement. I think it is now understood that close to half of flickr contributors honestly think they should apply a public domain mark to their own images, so robots should stop flagging these images for deletion. Geo Swan (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aleksandr Agapitov headshot.jpg

One of the Russian oligarchs? 186.175.45.220 21:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glove Cycle sculpture outbound platform.jpg

No FOP in US 4300streetcar (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep According to File:Part of Glove Cycle, October 2019.jpg (assuming this is the same installation), the artwork is covered under Template:PD-US-1978-1989.
Side note, I decided to boldly fix the deletion template since the NoFOP template messed up the arrangement on the file page. S5A-0043^Talk 03:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PSOne Style Famicom Clone adjusted.jpg

The original image was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:PSOne Style Famicom Clone.jpg. This file has the same issues. Didym (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:حديقة، شجرة خضراء، ممر مشاة، مشمس، نهار.jpg

unused, subject obscured by tree branches ~TheImaCow (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dr. Alice Prince (talk · contribs)

Unused low quality images of non-notable event, apparently uploaded for promotion

~TheImaCow (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022-2026-term-photo-1.jpg

File:1955hyancinthelevaou (1).jpg

1955 French photograph (subject was from Brittany). Not an own work of the uploader and not PD yet. Abzeronow (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ttimcheh.jpg

It is my photo and dont want share it Erfan rabiei (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: high quality, in scope image, several years past courtesy window, without a valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ttimcheh.jpg

I am concerned about privacy regarding the photo Erfan rabiei (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a deletion reason, but what is your privacy concern? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Raul Cantu~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: fictitious flags? Unclear what "allied forces" this flag is meant to represent.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]