Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 15

[edit]

This work may still be copyrighted in the United States because of URAA. The last author died in 1953, so copyright in France would expire in 2003 at the earliest (using the previous copyright term of life plus 50 years). This means that the work would still be copyrighted on the URAA restoration date (1 January 1996), so the US copyright is restored and expires 95 years after publication (at the end of 2025, or 1 January 2026). Anon126 ( ) 00:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


A copyrighted photograph is the main focus of these images.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates of images uploaded a day earlier (here). Metadata is slightly different, so bot isn't able to identify and properly tag them as such. Compare, for example, File:Foto Ricardo Stuckert PR (53991229465).jpg and File:2024-09-12 Visita ao Manto Tupinambá na Biblioteca do Museu Nacional, 002.jpg.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I've removed these images from Category:Tupinambá cape (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro) as they should soon be deleted. Let's stick to those that won't. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this AI-generated? The white boy appears to have six fingers, and the black boy appears to have only one foot, but that foot is kind of doubled/fused. And the file description is also quite odd. Is this in scope? Nakonana (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


AI-generated? Looks like a weird-shaped aircraft. And if it's not AI-generated / out of scope, then it's missing adequate source information. Nakonana (talk) 02:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


AI-generated? The white boy appears to be missing fingers, and it looks like he has three knees. Out of scope? Nakonana (talk) 02:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Even as an illustration of an abstract concept, this fails to hit the mark. There's nothing visible in this image which suggests "racism". Omphalographer (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file has an incorrect copyright license. I have uploaded a version with the correct license at Fred P. Hagemann.jpg because I am unsure how to change the copyright status of an existing image, or if that's even possible. There are also several other images uploaded by User:Aleccarlsson with incorrect copyright information as well. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is not AI-generated —there are some very small tanks in the image—, then it's missing adequate source information. Nakonana (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Non-free newspaper Astrinko (talk) 02:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work from an old local newspaper. Please don't delete it. Firudin Həmidli (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay. If you are the copyright owner of the newspaper article but you allow the file to be shared freely, then that's as it should be  Keep. Astrinko (talk) 11:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Facebook & F10 186.173.73.155 03:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


F10  ??? 186.173.73.155 03:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


not a real flag, no evidence that it is real. 140.159.2.226 03:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Cropped from? 186.173.73.155 03:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in USA, artist John Paul Thomas died in 2001 A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in USA, artist Jan Gordon Fisher died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Release to commons by the original writers of the text is missing.- Tohma (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The contain was outdated. Benteds (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keepper above. Hehua (talk) 12:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No valid reason for deletion. S5A-0043Talk 11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

license waching, probably not own work https://es.linkedin.com/posts/silviamunozdemorales_finalmente-graduada-el-pasado-septiembre-activity-6871114232914616320-yKcL Mateus2019 (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Calreyn88 (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of an architectural heritage monument :). I agree that it is not the prettiest building out there and that I'm not the best photographer out there, but I'm not in charge in determining what should be an architectural heritage monument and what not, and this is the only photo we have of this part of the building.
Note that an image does not have to be usable in an article; it only needs to be "in scope". And as an architectural heritage monument, I think it fulfills this requirement. Therefore:  Keep. Nakonana (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Covertwarfare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Infomist daiyupdates (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DELTA KD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

stock pic, not uploader's own; out of scope https://tineye.com/search/9a08d86851a054ef13ad2a41c1fa507b87d090cc?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terms of Use specify that re-use must be non-commercial. Nosferattus (talk) 06:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not own work Toggle88 (talk) 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User @Modern Sciences tagged this photo as speedy delete due to not own work. i have uploaded this picture with croptool from another picture. i just used the google images Find image source ability, wikimedia commons was only source that uploaded the original picture (expect facebook), so i think this picture and its original should not be deleted. Toggle88 (talk) 07:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Not so simple that it's below the threshold of originality as far as I can see. AlexandraAVX (talk) 07:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyrighted Materials: no information on the licence Michel Bakni (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


unused, promotional. Wikidata entry is already deleted as "not notable" Estopedist1 (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Astrinko as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F10 (photo personal by non-contributors), and out of scope) Yann (talk) 08:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This may be in scope, but permission from the author is needed. Yann (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Arjitk21 (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, as well as File:Parroquia San Martín Obispo.jpg which is a darker version of the same photo. For once, the mobile app nomination correct. This is a badly lit photo of a mobile phone displaying another badly lit photo. If it weren't for the filename, I'd have no idea at all what I was looking at. Omphalographer (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AshiqJB007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with bad history, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is totally blurry, nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Arjitk21 (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's blurry because it was taken with a relatively old camera in 2013. I haven't created the article yet, but I don't see any problem with deleting it if it doesn't meet the requirements. --bluetime93 💬 08:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article, totally blurry Arjitk21 (talk) 08:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's blurry because it was taken with a relatively old camera in 2013. I haven't created the article yet, but I don't see any problem with deleting it if it doesn't meet the requirements. --bluetime93 💬 08:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bad deletion request (it's not "nonsense"), but you could consider using some much sharper photos in Category:Ayazini Metropolis Multi Storey Settlement for the article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unknows license information Shiro NekoОбг. 09:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redurant https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Body_of_an_ISIS_fighter_found_by_a_Peshmerga_soldier_05.jpg Balqq (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy vio NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the original source to the photoː https://newsroom.ap.org/editorial-photos-videos/detail?itemid=bbecb6c13a1547e88d13c05f0af4479e&mediatype=photo In the "Copyright" section, it clearly readsː "Copyright 1966 AP. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed." That means this photo was not created by the US Government, and thus it's not in the public domain. TheOffShoot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays (talk) 10:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبًا أقدر لك سعيك في توفير صور حرة في الموسوعة.
أما بخصوص هذه الصورة فأقر إنني استأذنت من صاحب الحقوق ووافق على نشرها برخصة المحتوى . Ahmadf.alabbasi (talk) 10:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inferior version of File:Immigration Department of Malaysia Flag.jpg N niyaz (talk) 10:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: File:Immigration Department of Malaysia Flag.jpg.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

دعاية أو ترويج Mohammed Qays (talk) 10:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة ليست لها أهمية Mohammed Qays (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: Private image collections Bijection42 (talk) 10:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|<not because "bronze" but because "bronze-spring",I think this file be deleted.}} AggregatibacterActinomycetemcomitans (talk) 11:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Diemgood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All DW of the original image (sans text) and unnecessary duplicates. Plus Scope?

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Diemgood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All DW's - all need a free source

Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a screenshot of a WhatsApp conversation group. The file is categorized as out of scope, has no educational value. Astrinko (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


1990 Thesis , No indication author is a Federal Employee or serving US millitary. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merged and uploaded with a new jpg file TheoYalur (talk) 12:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems a counterfeit of File:Adam Frans van der Meulen - Louis XIV at the taking of Besançon (1674).jpg Pierre cb (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Este fichero es el mismo con color y encuadre mejorado de otro que subí en 2013: Bigjap (talk) 12:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El fichero original de 2013 es este: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Toshodaiji-1999-2.jpg Bigjap (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file, there's an SVG version. Adinar0012 (talk) 13:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although the posts are labeled as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, every posts read, "Please do not edit and take out with full credits." The photographer does not allow derivative works. This contradicts the Creative Commons license, and photos from this blog can not be hosted on Commons.

plicit 13:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I am afraid but these photos depict miniatures, dioramas, and other design elements that are protected by copyright. Just like one would not be allowed to create copies of them, we are not allowed to host photos of them on Commons. Therefore, the photos must be deleted. Please see COM:TOYS. (NB: WE do have a VRT permission from Games Workshop, so we are allowed to keep those.)

Gnom (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In some of these, such as File:Essen 2007 (a) 314.jpg and File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - terrain board 4.JPG, I think the motif of the photo is the situation (mainly the people), the miniatures and their arrangement seems to me to be de minimis – they could be exchanged or blurred somewhat with little harm to the image (in some, they are already out of focus).
Some other photos are clearly depicting the setting, the miniatures and terrain elements, or some of the three, such as File:Heroscape (1139110800).jpg, File:Spieltisch Dschungel.jpg and File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - miniature wargame terrain board - 06.jpg. I suppose that if the arrangement is copyrightable or there is a copyrighted main element, these have to go (I assume the photographer is not an author to the setting).
Some of the images (such as File:Plateau2.JPG) are blurry enough that it is hard to see what they were meant to depict, or that it is hard to see what their educational use would be.
LPfi (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(I didn't take into account the VRT from Games Workshop.) LPfi (talk) 18:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Concerning the File:Spieltisch Dschungel.jpg I did the arrangement. Elements like the river are completly build from scratch. Only the buildings can be bought as assembly sets, but are also painted by ourselves. This Foto was especially made for wikipedia by myself and I uploaded it by myself and agreed the open licence. The only problem could be any copyright issues concerning the buildings.
I also did the arrangement for File:Hilfsmittel Tabletop.jpg and File:Linienlaser.jpg. But there are miniatures visible from Steamforged Games from England and Freebooter Miniatures from Germany. Plexi83 (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd likewise point out that we tend to keep images of people playing games, ex. File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - terrain board 4.JPG. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. Image has appeared in multiple websites: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Not the work of uploader. Gpkp (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't useful 양념파닭 (talk) 13:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tupac IV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small size, low resolution, no EXIF, previous copyright violations as uploads -> unlikely to be own work

Polarlys (talk) 13:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-France}} applies, as the work is anonymous and over 70 years have passed. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that it is applicable (but it is not the one used), in any case from the photo it is not clear who the author is, the source and where it was taken, so ordinarily it is 120 years ZioNicco (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the same picture as File:Vík, Iceland (Unsplash).jpg. Jonashtand (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginary AI representation of a type of cooking pot where genuine photos can and do exist (eg. File:CMOC Treasures of Ancient China exhibit - bronze li.jpg), no prompt provided to suggest that something is being very carefully depicted here. Out of COM:SCOPE for being likely to contain inaccuracies. Belbury (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the request of the Administrator. EMILIO ZA (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Image is erroneous tagged as public domain and predating 1928, but it was taken in 2018 and published to a different website without the license being appropriate for upload to the Commons. Pbritti (talk) 14:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate alongside File:Congressman John Bidwell.jpg and File:JohnBidwell.jpg, all three of which are of lower quality than File:John Bidwell circa 1880.jpg PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 14:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate alongside File:Bidwell, John.jpg and File:JohnBidwell.jpg, all three of which are of lower quality than File:John Bidwell circa 1880.jpg PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate alongside File:Bidwell, John.jpg and File:Congressman John Bidwell.jpg, all three of which are of lower quality than File:John Bidwell circa 1880.jpg PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not a free image, and does not belong to uploader. It comes from online fan site use. Livelikemusic (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image is not a free image, and does not belong to uploader. Image belongs to photographer Leigh Kelly. Livelikemusic (talk) 15:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es el Carlos Darwin que estudió la evolución de los robles y otros árboles? Es que aquí todo el mundo se presenta como director, cineasta, escritor, poeta, astronauta etc. 200.39.139.21 16:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested by the mentioned person. Storybr (talk) 16:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested by the mentioned person. Storybr (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of file:Yeltsin Center.png MBH 17:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of file:Yeltsin Center.png MBH 17:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of file:Yeltsin Center.png MBH 17:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

очередной выдуманный флаг несуществующего народа, удалить Mizgel (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded to Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil by user:EPorto (WMB)

[edit]

I meant to upload those with my volunteer account, and only realized that the user I was logged in in the app is my professional account. --EPorto (WMB) (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM:G7 (earliest uploaded files are just nice within the 7 day period). S5A-0043Talk 11:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep @EPorto (WMB) just use the right attribution with a note explaining the account thing. It's completely pointless (and a stupid waste of storage space, as they will remain here, even if hidden) to delete the files so that you can upload them again with another account. Darwin Ahoy! 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you @S5A-0043 and @DarwIn. I prefer @DarwIn's solution; Can I go ahead and remove the note about the deletion proposal from the files and modify their credit? Cheers, EPorto (WMB) (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Könnten diese Wappendarstellungen möglicherweise neueren Datums sein und somit urheberrechtlich geschützt? In Frage kommt zum Beispiel ein Rekonstruktionsversuch oder sogar eine eigenmächtige Ausschmückung des Kamins. GerritR (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too blurry to be useful Krok6kola (talk) 19:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dheeman Dash Emon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Softconsult (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eu adicionei outra imagem do dicionário, como se pode ver em https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grande_Dicion%C3%A1rio_Sacconi_2.jpg. Também, a foto é de minha autoria Leandro M800 (talk) 19:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A nighttime shot of the casino and Christmas lights clearly taken from a moving vehicle. Too blurry to be of use and the eponymous category has other nighttime shots. I never work with uploads by other people/bots but I see that this is categorized in "Panoramio images reviewed by trusted users." I don't understand how any quality review would have okayed such an image? Shawn à Montréal (talk) 17:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PREX410 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files related to non-existent "micronation" - self creation, out of project scope. For context, you can try autotranslating archived userspace https://archive.is/eXnMm, which should be only use in matter of hours

InternetowyGołąb (talk) 19:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is Henrique de Campos. 186.175.23.192 20:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is Henrique de Campos. 186.175.23.192 20:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is Henrique de Campos. 186.175.23.192 20:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is Henrique de Campos. 186.175.23.192 20:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of the other uploads of this user is an own work, why would this be one? 186.175.23.192 20:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This work of art (?) seems to be an exact reproduction of the city's logo. Not really sure if the lack of FOP in France could play a role in all that. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS. The logo in question. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Originally uploaded as "own work", then changed to "This video, screenshot or audio excerpt was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license.", but I don't see any evidence on the YouTube page that it is indeed under CC. RoySmith (talk) 20:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The logo design is very complex for a simple design, there is a possibility that it exceeds the threshold of originality, especially the one below. Taichi (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio © Alissa Lüpke - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Le blason est celui de Mostuejouls, qui existe déjà, Capluc est le nom d'une de leur seigneurie et pas leur nom de famille Zardoz91 (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Le fichier a été remplacé par File:Blason Rouergue.svg. Zardoz91 (talk) 22:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Le blason est erronné, une autre version correcte existe déjà Zardoz91 (talk) 22:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inutilisé, pas de source pour ce fichier, blasonnement inconnu Zardoz91 (talk) 22:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per [6], this is a photograph by German photographer de:Alfred Krauth, who died in 1956. So the photo is not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2027. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albert Dossenbach.jpg. Rosenzweig τ 22:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file from a 1918 German magazine was uploaded with a tag falsely claiming that it is anonymous, when it obviously has an artist's signature in the lower right of the image. The signature reads H. Rösch, and even the source given calls it an Aquarell von H. Rösch (watercolor by H. Rösch). I could not yet find out more about this artist or when he died. But that does not mean we can treat this as an anonymous or pseudonymous work under German law, because pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2039 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. Rosenzweig τ 22:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Korso Kolbuszowskie is copyrighted Patryk2710 (talk) 23:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain these would be deemed copyrightable. Pretty typical examples of a longstanding vernacular tradition. - Jmabel ! talk 12:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Past copyvio deletions included this type of art. Nv8200p (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain these would be deemed copyrightable. Pretty typical examples of a longstanding vernacular tradition. - Jmabel ! talk 12:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Past copyvio deletions included this type of art. Nv8200p (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope. Personal picture imported from Flickr. Watermarked. Nv8200p (talk) 23:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is from a vacation photo collection and is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Nv8200p (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nv8200pa, define "educational purpose". RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Providing knowledge; instructional or informative, which seeing Kirt's friends at the beach doesn't do it for me Nv8200p (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can easily see these images on a textbook for learners of a foreign language, for example. Like I said, stock photos are clearly in scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Personal picture imported from Flickr. Watermarked. Nv8200p (talk) 23:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is from a vacation photo collection and is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Nv8200p (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nv8200pa, define "educational purpose". RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Providing knowledge; instructional or informative, which seeing Kirt's friends at the beach doesn't do it for me Nv8200p (talk) 01:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can easily see these images on a textbook for learners of a foreign language, for example. Like I said, stock photos are clearly in scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SCREENSHOT There is an arrow in the right of the image, similar to those found on Instagram. Most likely not own work. Frodar (talk) 23:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]