File:Fencepv.png
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search

Size of this preview: 730 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 292 × 240 pixels | 584 × 480 pixels | 807 × 663 pixels.
Original file (807 × 663 pixels, file size: 211 KB, MIME type: image/png)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Captions
Optimal inverter and wire selection for solar photovoltaic fencing applications
Summary
[edit]DescriptionFencepv.png |
English: Despite the benefits and the economic advantages of agrivoltaics, capital costs limit deployment velocity. One recent potential solution to this challenge is to radically reduce the cost of racking materials by using existing farm fencing as vertical photovoltaic (PV) racking. This type of fenced-based PV system is inherently electrically challenging because of the relatively long distances between individual modules that are not present in more densely packed conventional solar PV farms. This study provides practical insights for inverter selection and wire sizing optimization for fence-based agrivoltaic systems. Numerical simulation sensitivities on the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) were performed for 1) distance from the fence to the AC electrical panel, 2) inverter costs, and 3) geographic locations. The results showed that microinverters had better performance when the cross-over fence length was under 30 m or when the system was designed with less than seven solar PV modules, whereas string inverters were a better selection for longer fences. The cross-over number of modules depends significantly on the cost of the inverters, which is a parameter that influences the system's design. The capital costs for a fence retrofit are far less than for any form of conventional PV racking. In addition, the LCOE of the vertical fencing solar agrivoltaic system can be competitive with conventional ground-mounted solar PV for the niche of farmers. Especially, when they are located between the latitudes of 10° and 50° in either the northern or southern hemisphere, and coupled with their ancillary benefits they represent a great alternative for conventional PV systems.
- For Data and Simulation Files: Check the Project OSF Page Hayibo, K.S., Pearce, J.M., 2022. Optimal inverter and wire selection for solar photovoltaic fencing applications. Renewable Energy Focus. 42, (2022), Pages 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2022.06.006 academia open access, SSRN |
Date | |
Source | https://www.appropedia.org/Optimal_inverter_and_wire_selection_for_solar_photovoltaic_fencing_applications |
Author | Koami Soulemane Hayibo, Joshua M. Pearce |
Licensing
[edit]


This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 06:34, 17 November 2023 | ![]() | 807 × 663 (211 KB) | Yew know (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Koami Soulemane Hayibo, Joshua M. Pearce from https://www.appropedia.org/Optimal_inverter_and_wire_selection_for_solar_photovoltaic_fencing_applications with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 28.35 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 28.35 dpc |
File change date and time | 13:20, 20 February 2022 |
Hidden category: