User talk:Berchanhimez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Berchanhimez!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]

Sorry about this; it was just a misclick. Эlcobbola talk 19:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, figured - no harm no foul anyway, it was an auto notice to a blocked user so it wouldn't have changed anything :) User:elcobbola :) Berchanhimez (talk) 19:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestVirginiaWX (talk • contribs) 01:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That dot was meant to be a dummy edit because I accidentally hit the publish button before finishing the edit summary. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologizing for the warning and personal attacks

[edit]

@Berchanhimez, I just want to apologize for everything that happened during that argument. I did have a warning message (that I crossed out); but I went ahead and removed my warning. Of course, if there are formality issues with that, you’re more than welcome to re-add it and archive it (it’s still in the page history). WestVirginiaWX (talk) 01:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All is fine. It is a complex issue with a cross of opinion on "how precautionary" we must be and combined with incomplete information from the NWS. Berchanhimez (talk) 20:31, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service

[edit]

I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.

The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.

Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).

Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, I am gathering my thoughts to comment there. Berchanhimez (talk) 03:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]