User talk:NuManDavid
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Wife Sucks Husband.png
- File:During Rear-entery Sex, Woman Is Anally Fingered.png
- File:Anal Masturbation During Intercourse.png
- File:Couple having anal sex in the forest.png
- File:Male standing left nude in locker-room.png
- File:Male in briefs in locker-room.png
- File:Male standing right nude in locker-room.png
Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not an amateur porn site
[edit]
One or more of your recent contributions has been identified by another Commons user as a possible image not in Commons' scope. Commons has guidelines on nudity, as a result of already having a large number of photos of genitalia, specifically the male reproductive system and the penis.
If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding.--Yann (talk) 07:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Foreskin Restoration Taped Tenion.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
186.175.179.167 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Weighted Foreskin Restoration.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Comparing Circumcised, Restored and Uncircumcised Penises.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Comparing Circumcised, Restored and Uncircumcised Penises.png
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Comparing Circumcised, Restored and Uncircumcised Penises.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you
- I wanted that one deleted and couldn't figure out how NuManDavid (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
[edit]

Dronebogus (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]--Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I should be unblocked because Dronebogus was the instigator in our first exchange and was the instigator by engaging in my dispute that had nothing to do with them. They were the first one to engage in name calling, calling me homophobic. An insult that is still unanswered and unpunished. They chose to be my enemy and when they began with rudeness and received rudeness in return, suddenly they were the victim NuManDavid (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I said you came across as homophobic. How else am I supposed to interpret you saying your pictures are “images of heterosexual acts involving a husband and wife for visual documentation/learning” which you negatively compare to objectively superior images of gay sex? Dronebogus (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)