FALSE FLAGS - Problem-Reaction-Solution

The Problem-Reaction-Solution (PRS) formula, also known as the Satanic "Order out of Chaos", has been used in some form for thousands of years.(*) The use of this formula by various governments, groups, & individuals is a historical fact & can't be denied. In its basic form, it consists of using a fictional or real event, such a crisis, to bring about radical change. It is usually employed when the change to be brought about is controversial &/or disliked. And it often includes a type of framing called a False Flag Operation.

The online encyclopedia Wikipedia, states, "While false flag operations originate in warfare and government, they also can occur in civilian settings among certain factions, such as businesses, special interest groups, religions, political ideologies and campaigns for office." This formula can be used for political, civilian, religious, or business means. Warfare, crime, terrorism, drugs, the environment, disease, & the economy can all be instruments for crisis creation.

For example, the leadership of country A wants the natural resources of country B. But the leadership of country A realizes that their citizens will oppose an unjust war. So the leadership of country A creates a problem by staging a terror attack against its own military or civilian population. Through the media, the leadership of country A make it abundantly clear that country B is responsible. The people of country A are traumatized & demand justice. So the leadership of country A (seemingly) reluctantly complies, & offers the solution by launching a war against country B. This formula is ancient. Some historical examples follow.

The Great Fire of Rome

On the night of July 19 in the year 64AD a fire broke out in Rome, which burned for a total of nine days & destroyed about two-thirds of the city. Although fires were common in Rome, it is now believed by many that this was deliberately started by a Roman Emperor named Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, also known as Nero. Apparently at an earlier date, Nero had petitioned the senate with a plan to demolish one-third of Rome in order to build a series of villas & a lake, which he referred to as Neropolis. PBS noted in an article entitled, The Great Fire of Rome, that "The senate however, objected ardently to this proposal."

Groups of citizens, apparently at the direction of Nero, prevented anyone from putting the fire out, by threatening them with torture. "[S]ome in the population held Nero responsible," noted Wikipedia. "To diffuse blame, Nero targeted the Christians. Christians confessed to the crime, but it is unknown if these were false confessions induced by torture." According to PBS Nero had this religious group "indiscriminately and mercilessly crucified." "During gladiator matches" they wrote, "he would feed Christians to lions, and he often lit his garden parties with the burning carcasses of Christian human torches." After the fire Nero was able to build his Neropolis.

The Reichstag Fire

On the night of Feb. 27, 1933 the Reichstag building was set on fire. The Reichstag was Germany's version of congress or parliament. One month later on March 23rd, The Enabling Act, also known as the "Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Nation," was passed by the Reichstag. This was Germany's version of Homeland Security. It suspended most civil liberties outlined in the German constitution as well as habeas corpus. Wikipedia states, "Under the Act, the government had acquired the authority to pass laws without either parliamentary consent or control. Unprecedentedly, these laws could even deviate from the Constitution." This eliminated the Reichstag's participation in the creation of laws & allowed the Nazis to create a legal dictatorship.

Although the fire was blamed on Marinus van der Lubbe, it was later learned that the fire was set with the cooperation of the German government. An online historical archive called, The History Place, states, "Nazi storm troopers under the direction of Göring were also involved in torching the place. They had befriended the arsonist ... [&] even encouraged him to burn the Reichstag that night." "The Reichstag Fire," noted Wikipedia "has been attributed to the government of the newly elected Adolf Hitler by documents obtained by the Allies after the war and testimony of the Nuremberg Trials." This problem, followed by a solution, was apparently done to pave the way for a lawful dictatorship.

Operation Northwoods

One of the most notorious examples of a False Flag Operation, which almost came to fruition, is Operation Northwoods. It is now a documented historical fact that this operation was considered. Wikipedia describes Operation Northwoods, as a "1962 plan by the U.S. Department of Defense to stage acts of simulated or real terrorism on US soil ... and then put the blame of these acts on Cuba in order to generate U.S. public support for military action against the Cuban government. ... [T]he plan ... called for various false flag actions, including simulated or real state-sponsored acts of terrorism ... having real casualties."

On May 1, 2001, ABC News reported in an article called, U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba, that "In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba." An article entitled, U.S. terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext, which appeared in the April 24, 2001 issue of the Baltimore Sun, stated, "U.S. military leaders proposed in 1962 a secret plan to commit terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba to create a pretext for invasion... Citing the actual document they wrote, "We could develop a ... terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."

The proposal was given to President Kennedy by the head of the Joint Chiefs, General Lyman L. Lemnitzer of the Council on Foreign Relations, who was later denied another term by Kennedy & transferred to another job. "Afraid of a congressional investigation," wrote ABC, "Lemnitzer had ordered all Joint Chiefs documents related to the Bay of Pigs destroyed... But somehow, these remained." The plan was mistakenly discovered & made public on November 18, 1997 by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board, which was overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The plan specifically called for hijacking a civil airplanes, staging mock attacks &/or sabotage at Guantanamo Bay, blowing up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay, & sinking a ship full of Cuban refuges. All of these things were to be portrayed by the media as having originated from the Cuban government. Also in the document was a plan to wage a "terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. ... Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea," the document states.

The plan, affirmed ABC, included, "sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. Quoting from the actual document, the July 2001 issue of Harper's magazine described, "It is [also] possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shut down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama, or Venezuela." "We [also] could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," quoted the Sun.

LemnitzerTo the left is General Lyman Louis Lemnitzer of the Council on Foreign Relations, who demonstrated psychopathic traits when he attempted to persuade President Kennedy to carry out terrorist attacks against the civilian population in major U.S. cities.(**) The folks at the United Nations were apparently not offended by Lemnitzer's plan (which I'm sure they were aware of), because in 1963 they made him a Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, which is one of the two highest-ranking positions in the multinational military alliance.

ABC described, "The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war." "The desired result" added Harper's, "would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible Cuban government and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere." All done in order to, "Commence large-scale U.S. military operations," they wrote. According to ABC News, Operation Northwoods was approved by "all" of the Joint Chiefs of Staff before being presented to President Kennedy.

Journalist James Bamford, author of the book, Body of Secrets, wrote, "Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war."

[Footnotes]
* Problem-Reaction-Solution is a term that has been used (& possibly created) by film producer & talk radio host Alex Jones.
** All photos in this series are compliments of the BBC, Wikipedia, & Washington Post.

-Sources-
This formula can be used:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
a fire broke out in Rome: PBS Station, The Great Fire of Rome, http://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/case_rome/
Groups of citizens: Ibid
held Nero responsible: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_Rome mercilessly crucified: PBS Station, The Great Fire of Rome
Reichstag building was set on fire: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
One month later: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933
Nazi storm troopers: The History Place, The Reichstag Burns http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm
attributed to the government: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
simulated or real terrorism on US soil: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
drafted plans to kill innocent people: ABC News, U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba, May 1, 2001, David Ruppe, http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662
plan to commit terrorist acts against Americans: Baltimore Sun, U.S. terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext, April 24, 2001, Scott Shane & Tom Bowman, http://web.archive.org/web/20010507171811/www.baltimoresun.com/bal-te.md.nsa24apr24.story
Lemnitzer of the Council on Foreign Relations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods; http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/wwcfrjcs.html
Lemnitzer had ordered: ABC News, U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba, May 1, 2001, David Ruppe
made public on November 18: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
Also in the document: Ibid
orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities: ABC News, U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba, May 1, 2001, David Ruppe
Quoting from the actual document: Harper's Magazine, The Truth Is Out There, July, 2001, http://web.archive.org/web/20050912001704/http://www.painfuldeceptions.com/Cuba.html
blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay: Baltimore Sun, U.S. terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext, April 24, 2001, Scott Shane & Tom Bowman
The folks at the United Nations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyman_Lemnitzer; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Allied_Commander
to trick the American public: ABC News, U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba, May 1, 2001, David Ruppe
The desired result: Harper's Magazine, The Truth Is Out There, July, 2001
approved by "all" of the Joint Chiefs: ABC News, U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba, May 1, 2001, David Ruppe
Journalist James Bamford: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Problem-Reaction-Solution (Part 2)

Other Examples

Other incidents which are believed to have been False Flag Operations using the Problem-Reaction-Solution formula, include:

  • The sinking of the USS Maine in 1898 as a pretext for the Spanish-American war.
  • The Lusitania was sunk to bring the USA into WW1
  • The explosion of Japanese railway cars in 1931, which was done by Japanese officers as an excuse to seize Manchuria, which was occupied by the Chinese.
  • During the Gleivitz incident in 1939 German leadership fabricated evidence that they were under attack by Poland as an excuse to invade the country.
  • On November 26, 1939 the Soviet Union fired artillery on their own village of Mainila near the Finnish border as an excuse to attack Finland four days later.
  • Pearl Harbour was allowed by Stimson to bring the USA into WW2
  • In 1954 Israel bombed US & UK interests in Cairo. This was blamed on Egypt to provoke a war between the West & Egypt, & eventually came to be known as the Lavon Affair. Israel took responsibility for this in 2005.
  • The attack of two U.S. war ships by North Vietnamese vessels (Gulf of Tonkin Incident) was admitted to have been staged in order to involve the U.S. in the Vietnam War, which resulted in the death of 58,000 troops.

The Oklahoma City Bombing

Oklahoma City BombingThe Oklahoma City Bombing which occurred at 9:03 AM on April 19, consisted of the destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people. To the right we see the damaged federal building. The catastrophe was immediately labeled a domestic terrorist act, committed by right-wing extremists & militias. The following is only a brief summary of some major inconsistencies.

After mainstream news reported that multiple unexploded bombs were found in the building, the damage was attributed to a single ANFO bomb, weighing 1200 lbs. Then the FBI increased it to 4000, & finally 4800. An analysis of video footage from mainstream news outlets, such as KWTV-9, KFOR TV-5, & Channel 4 News, clearly reveals that two additional hi-tech bombs were found un-detonated. WorldNetDaily explained, "initial news broadcasts by KWTV-9, KFOR TV-5 and Channel 4 News all feature reports confirmed by state, local and federal officials that a total of three bombs had been placed inside the Murrah building." This confirmation was verified by a Department of Defense Atlantic Command memo, a FEMA Situational Report (SitRep), a U.S. Forces Command log, & an Oklahoma Highway Patrol radio log.

But, continued WorldNetDaily, "Within 24 hours, federal officials ... were saying that the explosion had not occurred within the building itself but instead the damage had been caused by a "car" parked in front of the building, loaded with the ANFO bomb. Soon afterward, the "car" became a Ryder rental truck and the explosives grew in size, to about 4,500 pounds." "Also," described WorldNetDaily, "independent engineers, explosives experts and military analysts conducted studies of the available evidence, many concluding that the government's "single truck-single bomb" explanation was technically impossible." Note the word, "impossible," not unlikely, but literally, "impossible."

On May 15, 1995, in an article entitled, Feds 'Fib' On Oklahoma City Bomb Says Ex-High Level FBI Official, The Spotlight magazine described, "A very high tech ... barometric bomb was the cause of the explosion that destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19. ... That is the conclusion of an FBI veteran with 28 years of service." His name, explained the Spotlight, is "Ted L. Gunderson of Santa Monica, California," & he "dismisses as a cover-up U.S. Justice Department claims that a simple bomb, concocted from fertilizer and fuel oil, was responsible for the blast." According to Gunderson, the builders of the bomb, "would need to possess knowledge of research classified at the very highest level."

General Benton K. Partin has a lifetime of explosives experience. He personally delivered a letter entitled, Bomb Damage Analysis Of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, to 56 members of congress. In his letter he stated, "The media and the Executive branch reported that the sole source of the devastation was a single truck bomb consisting of 4,800 pounds of ammonium nitrate, transported to the location in a Ryder Truck and parked in front of the building." But, says General Partin, "It is impossible that the destruction to the building could have resulted from such a bomb alone. ... The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb." General Partin described that explosives had to have been placed inside the building at the supporting columns. The general also reported how unfortunate it was that no independent investigation could unfold because the debris was immediately hauled away, & covered in a landfill guarded by wackenhut guards. He urged congress not to rush into passing any "anti-terror" legislation.

"The Partin letter," described Sam Gronning, a licensed professional blaster, "states in very precise technical terms what everyone in the business knows: No truck bomb of ANFO out in the open is going to cause the kind of damage we had there in Oklahoma City. In 30 years of blasting, using everything from 100 percent nitrogel to ANFO, I've not seen anything to support that story." Dr. Frederick Hansen, professor of physics at the University of Oregon has a career which includes professorships in engineering, aeronautics, & chemistry. "I agree with Gen. Partin," he proclaimed. "Everything considered, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that only an explosive detonated right at the column could have sheared it."

Oklahoma City BombingOn the left is an aerial view of the Murrah Federal Building. Notice the size of the chunk removed from the building in relation to the cars in the area. Explosives experts are convinced that it is impossible for a fertilizer bomb to have caused such damage. "In the case of the OKC Murrah Building, the failure pattern demonstrated to me that individual charges were placed on each of the failed columns inside the building," echoed Dr. Ernest B. Paxson, a U.S. Army explosives engineer, with 30 years of civilian defense-related projects. He continued, "a 4,800 pound ANFO truck bomb ... might blow a hole in the curtain wall closest to the truck, but it would hardly touch the supporting columns of the building."

Samuel Cohen, a physicist & creator of the Neutron Bomb, is also an expert on explosives. In a letter sent to Oklahoma State Representative Charles Key, he wrote, "It would have been absolutely impossible and against the laws of nature for a truck full of fertilizer and fuel oil ... no matter how much was used ... to bring the [Murrah] building down... The damage could not have resulted from a van parked outside. I don't care how fancy an explosive was used." Cohen expressed that it could only have occurred with high-tech explosives placed strategically within the building. "I believe that demolition charges in the building placed at certain key concrete columns ... [did] the primary damage to the Murrah Federal Building."

Multiple employees of the courthouse next to the Murrah building declared that a bomb squad van was in the vicinity as early as 7:30 AM. The occupants of the van, according to witnesses, were wearing dark shirts with white-silver lettering, which read, "Bomb Squad." Why were they there an hour & a half before the explosions? And multiple witnesses reported hearing at least two explosions. Also, during the investigation, the FBI refused to interview these types of key witnesses. Why? In addition, the Oklahoma Daily Gazette obtained hotel receipts which proved that Danny Coulson, the head of the FBI Anti-Terrorism Task Force, checked in to the Embassy Suites Hotel in Oklahoma City at 12:20 AM, on the morning of the bombing. What was the FBI doing there nine hours before the blast?

This tragedy triggered a public outrage, & the Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Bill (S. 390/H.R. 896), was the solution. The Spotlight described, "the leadership of both political parties may be exploiting the outrage and grief of the nation in the aftermath of the tragic bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City by trying to quickly push through Congress a trilogy of Orwellian legislation which threaten to curtail the civil liberties and constitutional rights of Americans. … This will authorize the U.S. military for the first time in our nation's history to counter domestic violence, and will increase surveillance on groups and individuals..." One year later the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) was singed into law by President Bill Clinton. "Domestic anti-terrorist bills were stalled in Congress before the bombing," added WorldNetDaily, "but sailed through to become law shortly afterward."(*)

[Footnotes]
* A documentary on the cover-up of the Oklahoma City Bombing, entitled Cover Up in Oklahoma, by Jerry Longspaugh, can be downloaded here
330MB MP4. For more information, visit http://www.akdart.com/okc.html; http://www.rense.com/general10/30.htm; http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm; http://www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt.htm

-Sources-
Other incidents: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident; San Antonio Express-News (Texas), Tonkin Incident Might Not Have Occurred, August 3, 2002, Bob Richter
The Oklahoma City Bombing which: WorldNetDaily, Oklahoma City's lost information, Early accounts differ from today's 'official' explanation of bombing, April 23, 2001, Jon Dougherty, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22518
committed by right-wing extremists & militias: Ibid
single ANFO bomb, weighing 1200 lbs: Ibid
This confirmation was verified: Ibid
A very high tech: The Spotlight, Feds 'Fib' On Oklahoma City Bomb Says Ex-High Level FBI Official, May 15, 1995, Mike Blair
General Benton K. Partin has a lifetime: Bomb Damage Analysis Of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, July 30, 1995, Brigadier Gen. USAF (Ret.), http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/PARTIN/ok2.htm
described Sam Gronning: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/7experts-support.html
Dr. Frederick Hansen: http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t46540.html
In the case of the OKC Murrah Building: Ibid
Samuel Cohen, a physicist & creator: Ibid
Multiple employees of the courthouse: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hoffman8.htm
hearing at least two explosions: WorldNetDaily, FBI refused 22 eyewitness testimonies, Posted: May 16, 2001, Jon Dougherty
checked in to the Embassy Suites Hotel: WorldNetDaily.com, Hotel receipt shows top terror man showed up 9 hours before blast, January 19, 2002, Jon Dougherty, http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26115
the leadership of both political parties: The Spotlight, Politicians Push Agenda As Rubble Settles, Spotlight on Congress, May 15, 1995
One year later the Antiterrorism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiterrorism_and_Effective_Death_Penalty_Act_of_1996
Domestic anti-terrorist bills were stalled: WorldNetDaily, Oklahoma City's lost information, Early accounts differ from today's 'official' explanation of bombing, April 23, 2001, Jon Dougherty

Problem-Reaction-Solution (Part 3)

Russian Apartment Bombings

In the beginning of September 1999 occurred a series of apartment bombings in Russia, which lasted for two weeks & killed almost 300 people. According to the official story told by Russian President Vladimir Putin, & the Federal Security Service (FSB), the bombings were caused by Chechen terrorists. Two men who denied involvement were convicted during a closed trial which was believed to be a charade. The bombings triggered anger by the Russian people which resulted in an invasion of Chechnya. It also made possible Vladimir Putin's smooth ascendance from Prime Minister to the presidency, by portraying him as a savior of the people. The BBC proclaimed, "shortly afterwards Mr Putin launched a second war against Chechnya. The military operation had massive support from a public outraged by the bombings."

During one attempted bombing some residents noticed suspicious activity & phoned the local police who arrived to discover a military-grade explosive in the basement of the building. They setup roadblocks hoping to catch the people matching the description. Upon discovering this, the perpetrators used a public telephone to contact a source, apparently for instructions on how to avoid the roadblocks. When an operator traced the call, it lead directly to the FSB in Moscow. The people who made this call were arrested by the local police.

On March 13, 2004, in an articled called, Secret at the heart of Putin's rise to power, the UK Telegraph wrote, "Shortly afterwards the two men were arrested. ... Each produced documents showing that he worked for the FSB. Later an order came down from Moscow ordering the local police release them." The next day, the head of the FSB announced that the entire operation had merely been a training drill. However, the local police concluded that the working explosive they found was the exact type used in the other bombings. Also, the bombings stopped when the FSB agents were caught.

Russian Apartment BombingsOn the right is a photograph of one of the bombed apartment buildings. The investigation, which resulted in a conviction of Chechens on charges of terrorism, was conducted by the FSB. But no Chechen claimed responsibility. A motion for another investigation was filed by at least one member of the Russian Parliament but was blocked by Putin. Not satisfied with the official report, some citizens formed a private committee to investigate the bombings. The committee was disbanded after multiple deaths ensued. No more investigations were allowed. The bomb found in the apartment was confiscated from the local police by the FSB, & all materials related to the incident were sealed for the next 75 years. Who benefited from these bombings?

Wikipedia states, "These suspicious events led to allegations that the bombings were in fact a "false flag" attack perpetrated by the FSB in order to legitimize the resumption of military activities in Chechnya and bring Vladimir Putin and the FSB to power." [A] growing body of proof has surfaced that links the bombings ... to the FSB," noted the Telegraph. Interestingly, President Vladimir Putin was an FSB chief until August of 1999. "The 1999 bombings," described the UK Telegraph, "proved to be Mr Putin's political making. He positioned himself as a strongman who would crush the Chechen rebels and restore order to the ailing country. ... Now, after winning nearly complete control over parliament in December and installing a loyal new cabinet ... Mr Putin is poised to seal another four years at Russia's helm."

"Former GRU officer Aleksey Galkin ... and other whistleblowers from the Russian government and security services have asserted that the 1999 Russian apartment bombings that precipitated the Second Chechen War were false flag operations," explained Wikipedia "perpetrated by the FSB, the successor organization to the KGB." "Alexander Litvinenko, a former FSB officer, also claimed that [the] apartment bombings were organized by the FSB and the GRU agents in the book Gang from Lubyanka..." On December 29, 2003 the FSB confiscated 5000 copies of this book en route to Moscow from Latvia. On November 1, 2006 Litvinenko fell ill & died three weeks later of acute radiation syndrome. A number of other accidents, deaths, & imprisonments related to an independent investigation of these bombings also occurred.

On March 6, 2002 in an article entitled, Former Ally Links Putin to Moscow Blasts, The London Guardian described how a tycoon named Boris Berezovsky accused Putin of being linked to the bombings. "Mr Putin, who was named prime minister shortly before the bombings after heading the FSB, blamed the attacks on Chechens and used public outrage to justify sending Russian forces into the rebel republic. Presenting himself as a tough war leader, he won the presidential election in 2000," stated the Guardian. Quoting Berezovsky, they wrote, "I am sure the bombings were organised by the FSB. It's not just speculation. It's a clear conclusion."

The BBC added, "He [Berezovsky] also has the backing of a Russian explosives expert, ex-FSB member and former director of the Russian Conversion Explosives Centre, Nikita Chekulin, who says that before the bombings, security services purchased large amounts of the explosive Hexogen, said to have been found at Ryazan. ... The tycoon said that the subsequent campaign in Chechnya aided Mr Putin's rise to power."

-Sources-
In the beginning of September: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings
Two men who denied involvement: UK Telegraph, Secret at the heart of Putin's rise to power, March 13, 2004, Julius Strauss, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/03/13/wruss13.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/03/13/ixnewstop.html
Mr Putin launched a second war: BBC News, Russian tycoon blames Moscow for blasts, March 6, 2002, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1857060.stm
residents noticed suspicious activity: UK Telegraph, Secret at the heart of Putin's rise to power, March 13, 2004, Julius Strauss
he worked for the FSB: Ibid
the bombings stopped: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings
resulted in a conviction of Chechens: UK Telegraph, Secret at the heart of Putin's rise to power, March 13, 2004, Julius Strauss
sealed for the next 75 years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings
perpetrated by the FSB: Ibid
proved to be Mr Putin's political making: UK Telegraph, Secret at the heart of Putin's rise to power, March 13, 2004, Julius Strauss
Former GRU officer Aleksey Galkin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
Alexander Litvinenko, a former FSB: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings
5000 copies of this book: Ibid
Litvinenko fell ill & died: Ibid
accused Putin of being linked to the bombings: The Guardian, Former ally links Putin to Moscow blasts, March 6, 2002, Jonathan Steele, Ian Traynor, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/mar/06/russia.iantraynor
backing of a Russian explosives expert: BBC News, Russian tycoon blames Moscow for blasts, March 6, 2002

Informants & Provocateurs

Individuals & groups may be used by federal & local law enforcement to create turmoil in order to justify a drastic change (solution). The chaos demonstrated by the Black Bloc during the WTO event in 1999 was apparently one of the main reasons for the implementation of Free Speech Zones, according to Wikipedia. The immediate result was a ban on protesting for 50 blocks around the convention center in Seattle where the meetings were taking place. "Most demonstrators were peaceful, marching and chanting, but police moved in swiftly when protesters attempted to block intersections, described the Associated Press on December 1, 1999. The eventual riots were caused by "demonstrators, who smashed windows, set spot fires and spray-painted obscenities on walls in a daylong melee yesterday. "We are winning," was a prominent graffiti message."

Black BlocVideo evidence exists which shows that this small group of 50 or so demonstrators called the Black Bloc, was completely separate from & denounced by genuine protestors.(*) The evidence also shows what appeared to be a stand-down by police, who stood back & watched the bloc cause chaos. The police were then released on the peaceful protestors. Referring to this anti-globalization rally in Seattle, the BBC News, reported on December 2, 1999 that, "The protestors were mainly peaceful," until "the black [bloc] anoraked anarchists came into play." The excuse for the police not interfering with the easily distinguished Black Bloc as they smashed windows & lit fires, was that they were "tied down, unable to get through the thick crowds." To the left is an image of a supposed Black Bloc protestor in the midst of what appears to be a spot fire at the WTO meeting in 1999 in Seattle.

What is this Black Bloc? Wikipedia describes the Black Bloc as a "cluster of affinity groups, that comes together during some sort of protest, demonstration, or other event involving class struggle, anti-capitalism, or anti-globalization." Black masks are worn to keep their identities secret. "Black blocs are differentiated from other anti-capitalist groups by their routine use of vandalism," states Wikipedia, & "property destruction to bring attention to their opposition to multi-national corporations." This group engages in building barricades, attacking police, vandalism, rioting, & fighting. Common targets of vandalism for the group, includes, "banks, institutional buildings, outlets for multinational corporations, [&] gasoline stations."

However, whether their rank & file members are aware of it or not, most probably they are run by the FBI & related federal law enforcement agencies. The controlling section is composed of provocateurs, & those on the lower faction are used as unwitting dupes. Like most other revolutionary movements, they are used as pawns by the financial elite (the exact same entity which they publicly oppose), to bring about radical change, that when scrutinized, only benefits the elite. Just as other groups & political ideologies which denounce financial elitists, such Communists & Nazis, were funded by Wall Street, so too this Black Bloc is certainly a creation of the financial elite.

An agent provocateur, explains Wikipedia, is "a person employed by the police or other law enforcement body to act undercover and entice or provoke another person to commit an illegal act. More generally, the term may refer to person or group who provokes another to perform a wrong or rash action, the deliberate purpose being to incite wider conflict or harm. ... Agents provocateurs are also used against political opponents..." It continued, "Here, it has been documented that provocateurs deliberately carry out or seek to incite counter-productive or ineffective acts, in order to foster public disdain for the group and provide a pretext for aggression against the group; and to worsen the punishments its members are liable for..."

I'd certainly say that the widespread use of Free Speech Zones is "counter-productive" to positive change. What does this Black Bloc have to gain by engaging in activities which, when examined, are fundamentally detrimental to the message of anti-globalization? Are they aware that they're actually helping the multinational corporations, by portraying them as the innocent victims? Their actions have resulted in protestors being moved out of view of the public/media, & punished by being banished to protest cages ½ mile away. Many peaceful protestors have also been beaten after being framed as Black Bloc anarchists. Who really benefits by these protest restrictions & Free Speech Zones?

"So," stated the BBC in their account of the WTO riot, "the masked figures roamed the downtown area, blocking traffic, shouting their slogans, spraying walls and windows with their graffiti and trying--and in some cases succeeding--in smashing windows of the elegant shops which are in the heart of Seattle. ... And so it went on all day on Tuesday, and into the night. The police had failed to protect the delegates and the street."

On August 24, 2007, Paul Joseph Watson of the independent media outlet Prison Planet, wrote, "The so-called "black bloc" rent a mob anarchists are ... controlled by the security services and are routinely employed at major protest events to cause riots and demonize legitimate peaceful protesters." Prison Planet described that the riot at the WTO meeting in 1999 was instigated by a "small minority of hostile black bloc hooligans," that the police allowed to cause chaos. Referring to the documentary Police State II, by Alex Jones, Watson wrote, "The film presents clear evidence that the ... anarchist groups are actually controlled by the state..." He concluded, "anyone who still professes to be a member of the group is ... supremely naive." A clip of this documentary, which demonstrates that this group works for the state, can be downloaded here (57MB WMV).

The BBC reported that the Seattle Police Department said riots at the WTO meetings in 1999 occurred because they were, "caught off-guard." They quoted one protestor who said, "It didn't make any sense ... They gassed us to move us back five or six feet..." But, "When this stuff [blatant vandalism occurred directly in front of the police] was happening they didn't do anything." In all likelihood, the police hadn't failed; they had accomplished what they were ordered to do. They allowed it to happen... And it didn't make any sense to protestors & others because they may not have recognized it as being part of the PRS formula. "By that time police had bolstered their ranks with hundreds of unarmed National Guardsmen and Washington State Patrol troopers--the gentle approach, they said, had failed," wrote the BBC. Enter the solution.

On December 1, 1999 PBS reported that Mayor of Seattle Paul Schell, told them, "Oh, yes. We'd worked for months with all of the demonstrators ... who had promised a peaceful, non-violent (protest). And as I said, 99 percent of them were fine. There were some self-proclaimed anarchists from other parts of the country who infiltrated those marches and started throwing off M-80s inside." The mayor here is apparently referring specifically to the Black Bloc that moved through an otherwise peaceful protest & caused havoc while the policed stood by & watched them.

The Associated Press reported on October 31, 2001 that a judge upheld the WTO no-protest zone which paved the way for new measures for dealing with future protests. "Free speech must sometimes bend to public safety," wrote Judge Rothstein. "There is no evidence that the 'manifest purpose' of the city was to quell expression." Of course not, they had to make it appear as though they were being cooperative. And, continued the judge, "The evidence shows that the (city) had reason to implement the zone." Yes, they did, because they helped the federal agencies to create it, then allowed it to escalate. "Moreover," continued the judge, "the president had just arrived in Seattle and intended to appear at the WTO conference." But, "Chaos and vandalism continued unabated."

What was the end result of all this chaos? Free Speech Zones also known as First Amendment Zones were the solution. These zones are areas set aside in public places (sometimes cages) for protestors to exercise their free speech. Although they've been used sparingly since the 60s, around the year 2000 their use expanded greatly. According to Wikipedia, the chaos resulting from the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in 1999 was the primary impetus for the widespread use of these zones. The purpose of the zones is to protect the safety of those attending the political gathering, as well as the protestors themselves.

These drastic changes were then implemented at WTO protests in Washington, D.C., Detroit, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Portland, & other places across the country, as well other countries including the UK & Canada. They are now regularly used during anti-globalization protests. During the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston, the Free Speech Zones consisted of a cell of concrete walls out of public view. They're now used by law enforcement to "censor protesters by putting them literally out of sight of the mass media, hence the public, as well as visiting dignitaries," described Wikipedia.

Free Speech Zone On the top left we see one man exercising his right to protest near (or in) what resembles a cage, at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. The man below him is protesting a presidential visit to South Carolina in 2003, a half mile away from the event. These zones are out of public view & sometimes quite a distance from the activity area. In an article called, Silencing Voices Of Dissent, CBS described one man who protested during a presidential visit to South Carolina in 2002. He was told he couldn't be anywhere but the free speech zone," described CBS. "But that so-called "free speech zone" wasn't outside the hangar ... It wasn't across the street. Nor was it down the street. It was a half a mile away, where he couldn't be seen," they wrote.

In addition to being used during anti-globalization protests, they're also used to distant protestors from the media & public during presidential visits. Now, when the president (& future presidents) travel around the country, "the Secret Service visits the location ahead of time and orders local police to set up "free speech zones" described the San Francisco Gate, in their article, Quarantining dissent. Free Speech Zones are used as isolation areas where people opposed to policy are "quarantined." "These zones routinely succeed in keeping protesters out of presidential sight and outside the view of media covering the event," they wrote. The trend that is occurring across the country is that anyone carrying signs which are against government or New World Order policy is sent to these zones, but supporters are welcome near the target area.

The Gate continued, "police Detective John Ianachione testified that the Secret Service told local police to confine "people that were there making a statement pretty much against the president and his views" in a so-called free-speech area. ... Paul Wolf, one of the top officials in the Allegheny County Police Department, told Salon [Magazine] that the Secret Service "come in and do a site survey, and say, 'Here's a place where the people can be, and we'd like to have any protesters put in a place that is able to be secured.'"

"In a May terrorist advisory," sustained the Gate, "the Homeland Security Department warned local law enforcement agencies to keep an eye on anyone who "expressed dislike of attitudes and decisions of the U.S. government."" Mike van Winkle, the spokesman for the California Anti-Terrorism Information Center told the Oakland Tribune, "You can make an easy kind of a link that, if you have a protest group protesting a war where the cause that's being fought against is international terrorism, you might have terrorism at that protest. You can almost argue that a protest against that is a terrorist act.""

An articled called, Italian police 'framed G8 protesters' which appeared in the London Guardian on June 22, 2002, stated that the Italian police planted cocktail bombs in a school used by "anti-globalisation protesters" in order to frame them during a 2001 G8 Summit. One officer apparently also falsified a charge that a protester attacked him with a knife. According the article, the framing was used to portray the protestors as members of the Black Bloc that had engaged in rioting during the summit. And it resulted in a room full of cracked skulls with a floor covered with broken teeth.

"According to a magistrates' investigation," explained the Guardian, "the police improvised lies to justify a bloodsoaked raid at the Diaz school, which was being used by protesters as a headquarters. The raid, which left dozens injured after being kicked, punched and beaten with batons, prompted an international outcry. It emerged this week that senior police officers have been placed under investigation for allegedly making false statements as part of a cover-up." Interestingly, the attendees of the summit included George W. Bush, Tony Blair, & another man who is no stranger to the PRS formula, President Vladimir Putin of Russia. The Black Bloc serves the financial elite quite well actually. In reality, it helps them use federal & local police (which they control) to crack down on peaceful protestors whose only threat is the power of their words.

Black BlocTo the right we see members of the Black Bloc at an anti-war protest in Washington D.C. in 2003 (top) & 2005. This group seems to have a convenient habit of evading police as it moves through crowds of peaceful protestors like a virus & wreaks havoc. Unfortunately, peaceful protestors receive the backlash. Mainstream information suggests that almost all of the people who assemble at these rallies to protest the New World Order are non-violent. But when the general public hears stories or sees news flashes of this chaos, will they think that a small specialized group, which was obviously deliberately created for this purpose, is responsible? Probably not. Most people are likely to think that protestors "in general" are responsible.

So this seems to be a multi-attack by the Establishment. First to physically & mentally punish those who oppose them with physical violence & caged speech zones. Second, to lawfully limit their right to free speech. Finally, to associate peaceful protestors with, what is obviously intended to be, a terrorist squad of fake & deluded protestors dressed in black masks. Although this may sound ridiculous, consider their other actions which can't be denied. This is how they think!

Undercover police officers may also be used by the financial elite to provoke violence. On August 21, 2007, the Toronto Star declared, "Protesters are accusing police of using undercover agents to provoke violent confrontations at the North American leaders' summit... Such accusations," they said, "have been made before after similar demonstrations but this time the alleged "agents provocateurs" have been caught on camera." The Star described a YouTube video which showed three masked men (at least one holding a rock) who attempted incite violence. The three were apparently exposed as agent provocateurs by some experienced genuine protestors. "Rather than leave, the three actually start edging closer to the police line, where they appear to engage in discussions," depicted the Star. The video shows them being handcuffed & taken away.

According to the Star, photographs taken of the provocateurs during their staged arrest showed clearly that they had, not similar boots, but the exact same type of boots as the uniformed police. The article continued, "Police confirm that only four protesters were arrested during the summit--two men and two women. All have been charged with obstruction and resisting arrest." However, "The three [alleged provocateurs] do not appear to have been arrested or charged with any offence," the Star described. The "Video," echoed the Globe & Mail, "also shows the three eventually being led quietly away to police vans," but by contrast, according to witnesses, genuine protestors were roughed up & dragged away. The Star quoted one protester who stated, "But we see very clearly in that video three (other) men being arrested." He asked "How do (police) account for these three people being taken in, being arrested? Where did they go?"

"The Mounties and Quebec provincial police [SQ] deny using agents provocateurs at this week's Montebello summit," wrote the Globe & Mail, "despite incriminating video evidence that suggests undercover cops tried to incite violence. The denials yesterday did nothing to quell mounting outrage over police tactics. Anti-globalization and union activists joined with opposition politicians to demand an independent investigation. ... "I confirm [to] you that there are no agents provocateurs in the Sûreté du Québec," Constable Melanie Larouche said."

CBC News later reported that the SQ (Quebec Police) admitted that the alleged provocateurs were theirs. "Quebec provincial police admitted Thursday that three of their officers disguised themselves as demonstrators during the protest at the North American leaders summit," stated CBC. But instead of admitting that they were discovered when they attempted to provoke violence, the police claimed that they were identified as undercover police when they refused to throw objects. "Police said the three undercover officers were only at the protest to locate and identify non-peaceful protesters in order to prevent any incidents," said CBC.

It's clear to me that in addition to federal & local law enforcement fighting crime, they also act as a private security force for multi-national corporations. They are the financial elite's private army & ensure their continual rule. For those of you who wish to engage in peaceful anti-globalization or corporate protest, you can count on the financial elite using federal & local law enforcement to stage a barrage of illegal acts, using individual informants, the Black Bloc, or other groups. Their activities include framings, provoking violence, engaging in unnecessary violence, & using informants to instigate violence. When examined within the context of the Problem-Reaction-Solution formula, the chaos resulting from these activities appears to further globalist political objectives, by providing an excuse (solution), which allows them to legally neutralize dissent.

How can we retain the protest rights we still have? For as long as the government is controlled by corporations, a permanent solution won't be possible. Their onslaught will continue in a variety of forms. But letting fellow protestors know that these tactics may be used is probably a good idea. In addition to making legal arrangements for a big anti-globalism protest, contacting key people & groups in the area & letting them know that you're aware of this formula, may help.

I realize that you'd in essence be contacting some of the very people who would be complicit in the creation of the staged chaos. And if you do this, you may enjoy a protest without framings, but there will probably be other consequences. Because what you've done is exposed one of their most effective tactics. But the hour is late. Protestors are already being labeled potential terrorists. It's obvious to me that their objective is to eventually outlaw protests in general, by linking them to these state-run terrorist blocs. So, repercussions & all, letting them know that you know, may temporarily delay them from reaching their goal.

-Sources-
The chaos demonstrated by the Black Bloc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
Most demonstrators were peaceful: The Associated Press, Seattle officials declare no-protest zone around world trade talks, http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=4228
protestors were mainly peaceful: BBC News, The Battle of Seattle, A city under civil emergency December 2, 1999, Paul Reynolds, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/547581.stm
describes the Black Bloc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc
Just as other groups: Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler, Professor Antony C. Sutton; The Shadows Of Power, James Perloff
an agent provocateur as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur
the masked figures roamed: BBC News, The Battle of Seattle, A city under civil emergency December 2, 1999, Paul Reynolds
The so-called "black bloc" anarchists: Prison Planet, Canadian Police Caught Attempting To Stage Riots, August 24, 2007, Paul Joseph Watson http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/240807_stage_riots.htm
Seattle Police Department said riots: BBC News, Seattle police tactics under scrutiny, December 2, 1999, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/547302.stm
Mayor of Seattle Paul Schell: PBS, National Guard helps restore order, December 1, 1999, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/international/july-dec99/wto_mayor_12-1.html
a judge upheld the WTO no-protest zone: The Associated Press, Federal court upholds WTO no-protest zone, October 31, 2001, http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15273
These zones are areas set aside: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
These drastic changes: Ibid; San Francisco Gate, Quarantining dissent, How the Secret Service protects Bush from free speech, January 4, 2004, James Bovard, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/01/04/INGPQ40MB81.DTL
a cell of concrete walls: Ibid (Wikipedia)
literally out of sight: Ibid
CBS described one man: CBS News, Silencing Voices Of Dissent, December 4, 2003, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/04/eveningnews/main586959.shtml
Secret Service visits the location: San Francisco Gate, Quarantining dissent, How the Secret Service protects Bush from free speech, January 4, 2004, James Bovard
the Italian police planted cocktail bombs: UK Guardian, Italian police 'framed G8 protesters', June 22, 2002, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/22/globalisation.rorycarroll
room full of cracked skulls: Financial Times, Inside the Black Bloc, October 15 2001, James Harding, http://specials.ft.com/countercap/FT3BG4GLUSC.html
the police improvised lies: UK Guardian, Italian police 'framed G8 protesters', June 22, 2002
Protesters are accusing police: Toronto Star, Police accused of using provocateurs at summit August 21, 2007, http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/248608
led quietly away to police vans: The Globe & Mail (Canada), Police Planted Provocateurs, Protesters Say, August 23, 2007, Joan Bryden, http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/23/3368/
The Star quoted one protester: Toronto Star, Police accused of using provocateurs at summit August 21, 2007
The Mounties and Quebec provincial police: The Globe & Mail (Canada), Police Planted Provocateurs, Protesters Say, August 23, 2007, Joan Bryden
CBC News later reported that: CBC News, Quebec police admit they went undercover at Montebello protest, August 23, 2007, http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/08/23/police-montebello.html
labeled potential terrorists: The Village Voice, J. Edgar Hoover Back at the 'New' FBI, Classified FBI Bulletin Reveals Tactics at Protests, December 4, 2003, Nat Hentoff
 

Concealment for False Flag Operations

Drills & sting operations may be run in conjunction with these state-sponsored terrorist acts, as a cover in case they get caught, or as a smokescreen to cause confusion. Remember how the real bomb found during the Russian Apartment Bombings was dismissed as being part of a drill? Also, during both the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, & the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in 1995, the FBI & BATF were working with the alleged terrorists under a sting operation. When their connections to these terrorist acts are discovered, they can always claim they were incompetent during a drill or sting operation gone bad.

In a December 9, 1999 article entitled, The FBI and the mad bombers, WorldNetDaily, proclaimed, "The most sensible conclusion anyone came to after examining evidence like this is that the Oklahoma City bombing was a sting operation that went wrong. But, incredibly, the same conclusion can be drawn about the [first] World Trade Center bombing." They continued, "the tentacles of funding, control and conspiracy always seem to lead right back to the government--whether it's the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms or some other similar agency. This is the case with the most dramatic bombings in the recent history of our country--from Oklahoma City to the World Trade Center."

There are some major unanswered questions regarding what occurred on 911. To cover this subject well requires a separate report or an entire book.(*) But an independent investigation which is not headed by a member of the Council on Foreign Relations or related group is required. On 911 the CIA ran a drill that included a plane flying into a building, which created confusion & caused NORAD to stand-down for the first time in its 50-year history. "In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings," stated the Boston Globe on August 21, 2002, in an articled entitled, Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building.

"Adding to the coincidence," continued the Globe, "American Airlines Flight 77 ... [which] was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon ... took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin." Art Haubold, a spokesperson for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) stated, "It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility... As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise." The NRO works with the CIA, NSA, DIA, & the military to build & monitor reconnaissance satellites.

Describing how an FBI informant named Emad A. Salem infiltrated an Arab group in New York, to coax them into bombing the world trade center in 1993, WorldNetDaily wrote, "When he was asked to assemble the bomb, he went to the FBI to ask for harmless powder to avoid a catastrophe." But instead he was given materials to build a live bomb! "To make a long, complicated story short and simple," said WorldNetDaily, "The FBI spent $3 million of your tax money to blow up the World Trade Center. The story's essentially the same at Waco, Ruby Ridge and other government-made disasters."

Conclusion

There are many, many other documented historical examples of PRS in practice, as well as countless others which have not yet been officially recognized.(**) This formula is being used on a variety of levels to further the New World Order political agenda. It's probably one of the most used tactic to bring about massive change. Although it's simple in theory, most people don't think along these lines, because they themselves would never resort to such a tactic. But it's used over & over again by the various governments which are controlled by the financial elite. Always under the guise of aiding & protecting the people. Therefore, learning how to recognize when this formula is being used will prove to be a useful skill.

These acts may not make sense if viewed as isolated incidents. But when examined as essential steps in establishing a dictatorship, they begin to make sense. They also become clearer when a couple of things are considered. First, that federal law enforcement & most local law enforcement, are controlled by the financial elite. Most officers are loyal patriots, & may not be aware of a hidden agenda. But there are plenty of others who have been hired specifically to carry out these kinds of activities, & they are used to further this political movement. Second, this chaos is necessary in order to pass subversive legislation which allows the financial elite to install a "legal" dictatorship. In other words, portions of federal & local law enforcement are used as a type of terrorist network for people of tremendous wealth. This can all be done & covered-up for reasons of national security. Presumably, these are the same lower-level psychopaths that the financial elite are now using to torture & murder their enemies globally, with state-run Gang Stalking & Directed Energy Weapons.

It would not surprise me in the least, if a wave of crime was arranged during the late 70s in order to jump-start these citizen brigades. First they may have started with genuine threats, & still do target them to give the Hidden Evil the appearance of legitimacy. Bogus statistics may even be used to justify its continuation. But it's clear to me that the primary purpose for this program is to help establish a global fascist state. Because we now understand that it's a matter of public record that worse scenarios were considered for political purposes, this is not completely speculation. In fact, the evidence suggests that these are exactly the types of things that these people do.

So, whenever a crisis occurs, or the threat of a crisis looms, or a series of crimes unfold which is hyped by the media, understand that the psychopaths who control the NATO governments may be attempting to terrorize you into accepting new legislation. If a new bill is introduced you should be skeptical. On the surface, it's guaranteed to appear useful. And almost certainly, it will have a helpful-sounding name (Semantic Deception).(***) The Establishment's cheerleaders in the mainstream news will even try to convince you that it's a sensible change.

If this happens, if possible, examine the bill & read related articles on various independent media outlets to learn what it really means. Just a few of the questions you may want to ask yourself include: Are freedoms being lost? Are parts of the constitution being attacked? Who benefits? Does this in any way further world government? If the solution ultimately results in more control & less civil liberties, the crisis may have been a PRS operation.

"When will this insanity end?" asked WorldNetDaily. "What is the overall objective of the FBI and government? Are these activities actually designed to thwart terrorism or encourage it? Who benefits most from terrorist activity?" They continued, "Americans might be shocked to learn that their government is involved in such escapades. But those who study history should expect such things. It's been going on since the beginning of time. Planting seeds of fear among the people only helps those in government remain in power and grab more control over people's lives." They conclude, "Remember this the next time you hear about a so-called "terrorist incident.""

Most of us would never give up our personal freedoms--unless we were required to in exchange for protection against a threat... In the documentary, The Capitalist Conspiracy, author G. Edward Griffin asked, "But what is the best way to sell big government & then world government to a people like ours?" To answer his own question, he described a process where the financial elite deliberately create problems, & then offer only those solutions that result in the expansion of government.

Giving up personal liberties, says Griffin, can be accomplished by creating conditions "so frightful at home & abroad that the abandonment of personal liberties & national sovereignty will appear as a reasonable price for a return to domestic tranquility & world peace." To setup a police state, he says, requires the creation of, "chaos, crime & anarchy in the streets." And to convince the people of the benefits of "world government" requires the constant threat of war. He finishes, "as they say in revolutionary circles, "the real action, is in the reaction.""

[Footnotes]
* Curious readers should view the documentaries, 911: Rise of the Police State, by Alex Jones, & 911: The Great Illusion, by George Humphreys. Both are available at
www.infowars.com.
** For more examples of Problem-Reaction-Solution, see
Federal Reserve, Pearl Harbor, & Great Depression.
*** The U.S. Patriot Act is a superb example of this. It's similar to Hitler's Enabling Act. More interesting similarities surface when investigating the events surrounding 911, Operation Northwoods, & The Reichstag Fire.

-Sources-
during both the first World Trade Center bombing: The New York Times, Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast, October 28, 1993, Ralph Blumenthal; WorldNetDaily, The FBI and the mad bombers, December 09, 1999, Joseph Farah
The most sensible conclusion: Ibid (WorldNetDaily)
In what the government describes: Boston Globe (Associated Press), Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building, August 21, 2002, John J. Lumpkin; Toronto Star, "Northern Guardian": The Scene at NORAD on Sept. 11, December 9, 2001, Scott Simmie, http://www.oilempire.us/norad.html
The NRO works with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Reconnaissance_Office
Describing how an FBI informant: WorldNetDaily, The FBI and the mad bombers, December 09, 1999, Joseph Farah
But there are plenty of others: Techniques used to silence critics, Ted L. Gunderson, FBI Senior Special Agent In Charge (Ret)
When will this insanity end: WorldNetDaily, The FBI and the mad bombers, December 09, 1999, Joseph Farah
the best way to sell big government: Capitalist Conspiracy: An Inside View of International Banking, G. Edward Griffin