Informants
& Provocateurs
Individuals & groups may be used by federal & local law
enforcement to create turmoil in order to justify a
drastic change (solution). The chaos demonstrated by the
Black Bloc during the WTO event in 1999 was apparently
one of the main reasons for the implementation of Free
Speech Zones, according to Wikipedia. The immediate
result was a ban on protesting for 50 blocks around the
convention center in Seattle where the meetings were
taking place. "Most demonstrators were peaceful,
marching and chanting, but police moved in swiftly when
protesters attempted to block intersections, described
the Associated Press on December 1, 1999. The eventual
riots were caused by "demonstrators, who smashed
windows, set spot fires and spray-painted obscenities on
walls in a daylong melee yesterday. "We are winning,"
was a prominent graffiti message."
Video
evidence exists which shows that this small group of 50
or so demonstrators called the Black Bloc, was
completely separate from & denounced by genuine
protestors.(*) The evidence also shows what appeared to
be a stand-down by police, who stood back & watched the
bloc cause chaos. The police were then released on the
peaceful protestors. Referring to this
anti-globalization rally in Seattle, the BBC News,
reported on December 2, 1999 that, "The protestors were
mainly peaceful," until "the black [bloc] anoraked
anarchists came into play." The excuse for the police
not interfering with the easily distinguished Black Bloc
as they smashed windows & lit fires, was that they were
"tied down, unable to get through the thick crowds." To
the left is an image of a supposed Black Bloc protestor
in the midst of what appears to be a spot fire at the
WTO meeting in 1999 in Seattle.
What is this Black Bloc? Wikipedia describes the Black
Bloc as a "cluster of affinity groups, that comes
together during some sort of protest, demonstration, or
other event involving class struggle, anti-capitalism,
or anti-globalization." Black masks are worn to keep
their identities secret. "Black blocs are differentiated
from other anti-capitalist groups by their routine use
of vandalism," states Wikipedia, & "property destruction
to bring attention to their opposition to multi-national
corporations." This group engages in building
barricades, attacking police, vandalism, rioting, &
fighting. Common targets of vandalism for the group,
includes, "banks, institutional buildings, outlets for
multinational corporations, [&] gasoline stations."
However, whether their rank & file
members are aware of it or not, most probably they are
run by the FBI & related federal law enforcement
agencies. The controlling section is composed of
provocateurs, & those on the lower faction are used as
unwitting dupes. Like most other revolutionary
movements, they are used as pawns by the financial elite
(the exact same entity which they publicly oppose), to
bring about radical change, that when scrutinized, only
benefits the elite. Just as other groups & political
ideologies which denounce financial elitists, such
Communists &
Nazis,
were funded by Wall Street, so too this Black Bloc is
certainly a creation of the financial elite.
An
agent provocateur, explains Wikipedia, is "a person
employed by the police or other law enforcement body to
act undercover and entice or provoke another person to
commit an illegal act. More generally, the term may
refer to person or group who provokes another to perform
a wrong or rash action, the deliberate purpose being to
incite wider conflict or harm. ... Agents provocateurs
are also used against political opponents..." It
continued, "Here, it has been documented that
provocateurs deliberately carry out or seek to incite
counter-productive or ineffective acts, in order to
foster public disdain for the group and provide a
pretext for aggression against the group; and to worsen
the punishments its members are liable for..."
I'd
certainly say that the widespread use of Free Speech
Zones is "counter-productive" to positive change. What
does this Black Bloc have to gain by engaging in
activities which, when examined, are fundamentally
detrimental to the message of anti-globalization? Are
they aware that they're actually helping the
multinational corporations, by portraying them as the
innocent victims? Their actions have resulted in
protestors being moved out of view of the public/media,
& punished by being banished to protest cages ½ mile
away. Many peaceful protestors have also been beaten
after being framed as Black Bloc anarchists. Who really
benefits by these protest restrictions & Free Speech
Zones?
"So," stated the BBC in their account of the WTO riot,
"the masked figures roamed the downtown area, blocking
traffic, shouting their slogans, spraying walls and
windows with their graffiti and trying--and in some
cases succeeding--in smashing windows of the elegant
shops which are in the heart of Seattle. ... And so it
went on all day on Tuesday, and into the night. The
police had failed to protect the delegates and the
street."
On August 24, 2007, Paul Joseph
Watson of the independent media outlet Prison Planet,
wrote, "The so-called "black bloc" rent a mob anarchists
are ... controlled by the security services and are
routinely employed at major protest events to cause
riots and demonize legitimate peaceful protesters."
Prison Planet described that the riot at the WTO meeting
in 1999 was instigated by a "small minority of hostile
black bloc hooligans," that the police allowed to cause
chaos. Referring to the documentary Police State II, by
Alex Jones, Watson wrote, "The film presents clear
evidence that the ... anarchist groups are actually
controlled by the state..." He concluded, "anyone who
still professes to be a member of the group is ...
supremely naive." A clip of this documentary, which
demonstrates that this group works for the state, can be
downloaded
here (57MB WMV).
The
BBC reported that the Seattle Police Department said
riots at the WTO meetings in 1999 occurred because they
were, "caught off-guard." They quoted one protestor who
said, "It didn't make any sense ... They gassed us to
move us back five or six feet..." But, "When this stuff
[blatant vandalism occurred directly in front of the
police] was happening they didn't do anything." In all
likelihood, the police hadn't failed; they had
accomplished what they were ordered to do. They allowed
it to happen... And it didn't make any sense to
protestors & others because they may not have recognized
it as being part of the PRS formula. "By that time
police had bolstered their ranks with hundreds of
unarmed National Guardsmen and Washington State Patrol
troopers--the gentle approach, they said, had failed,"
wrote the BBC. Enter the solution.
On
December 1, 1999 PBS reported that Mayor of Seattle Paul
Schell, told them, "Oh, yes. We'd worked for months with
all of the demonstrators ... who had promised a
peaceful, non-violent (protest). And as I said, 99
percent of them were fine. There were some
self-proclaimed anarchists from other parts of the
country who infiltrated those marches and started
throwing off M-80s inside." The mayor here is apparently
referring specifically to the Black Bloc that moved
through an otherwise peaceful protest & caused havoc
while the policed stood by & watched them.
The
Associated Press reported on October 31, 2001 that a
judge upheld the WTO no-protest zone which paved the way
for new measures for dealing with future protests. "Free
speech must sometimes bend to public safety," wrote
Judge Rothstein. "There is no evidence that the
'manifest purpose' of the city was to quell expression."
Of course not, they had to make it
appear as though they were being cooperative.
And, continued the judge, "The evidence shows that the
(city) had reason to implement the zone." Yes, they did,
because they helped the federal agencies to create it,
then allowed it to escalate. "Moreover," continued the
judge, "the president had just arrived in Seattle and
intended to appear at the WTO conference." But, "Chaos
and vandalism continued unabated."
What was the end result of all this chaos? Free Speech
Zones also known as First Amendment Zones were the
solution. These zones are areas set aside in public
places (sometimes cages) for protestors to exercise
their free speech. Although they've been used sparingly
since the 60s, around the year 2000 their use expanded
greatly. According to Wikipedia, the chaos resulting
from the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in
1999 was the primary impetus for the widespread use of
these zones. The purpose of the zones is to protect the
safety of those attending the political gathering, as
well as the protestors themselves.
These drastic changes were then implemented at WTO
protests in Washington, D.C., Detroit, Philadelphia, Los
Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Portland, & other places across
the country, as well other countries including the UK &
Canada. They are now regularly used during
anti-globalization protests. During the 2004 Democratic
National Convention in Boston, the Free Speech Zones
consisted of a cell of concrete walls out of public
view. They're now used by law enforcement to "censor
protesters by putting them literally out of sight of the
mass media, hence the public, as well as visiting
dignitaries," described Wikipedia.
On the top left we see one man exercising his right to
protest near (or in) what resembles a cage, at the
Democratic National Convention in 2004. The man below
him is protesting a presidential visit to South Carolina
in 2003, a half mile away from the event. These zones
are out of public view & sometimes quite a distance from
the activity area. In an article called, Silencing
Voices Of Dissent, CBS described one man who protested
during a presidential visit to South Carolina in 2002.
He was told he couldn't be anywhere but the free speech
zone," described CBS. "But that so-called "free speech
zone" wasn't outside the hangar ... It wasn't across the
street. Nor was it down the street. It was a half a mile
away, where he couldn't be seen," they wrote.
In
addition to being used during anti-globalization
protests, they're also used to distant protestors from
the media & public during presidential visits. Now, when
the president (& future presidents) travel around the
country, "the Secret Service visits the location ahead
of time and orders local police to set up "free speech
zones" described the San Francisco Gate, in their
article, Quarantining dissent. Free Speech Zones are
used as isolation areas where people opposed to policy
are "quarantined." "These zones routinely succeed in
keeping protesters out of presidential sight and outside
the view of media covering the event," they wrote. The
trend that is occurring across the country is that
anyone carrying signs which are against government or
New World Order policy is sent to these zones, but
supporters are welcome near the target area.
The
Gate continued, "police Detective John Ianachione
testified that the Secret Service told local police to
confine "people that were there making a statement
pretty much against the president and his views" in a
so-called free-speech area. ... Paul Wolf, one of the
top officials in the Allegheny County Police Department,
told Salon [Magazine] that the Secret Service "come in
and do a site survey, and say, 'Here's a place where the
people can be, and we'd like to have any protesters put
in a place that is able to be secured.'"
"In
a May terrorist advisory," sustained the Gate, "the
Homeland Security Department warned local law
enforcement agencies to keep an eye on anyone who
"expressed dislike of attitudes and decisions of the
U.S. government."" Mike van Winkle, the spokesman for
the California Anti-Terrorism Information Center told
the Oakland Tribune, "You can make an easy kind of a
link that, if you have a protest group protesting a war
where the cause that's being fought against is
international terrorism, you might have terrorism at
that protest. You can almost argue that a protest
against that is a terrorist act.""
An
articled called, Italian police 'framed G8 protesters'
which appeared in the London Guardian on June 22, 2002,
stated that the Italian police planted cocktail bombs in
a school used by "anti-globalisation protesters" in
order to frame them during a 2001 G8 Summit. One officer
apparently also falsified a charge that a protester
attacked him with a knife. According the article, the
framing was used to portray the protestors as members of
the Black Bloc that had engaged in rioting during the
summit. And it resulted in a room full of cracked skulls
with a floor covered with broken teeth.
"According to a magistrates' investigation," explained
the Guardian, "the police improvised lies to justify a
bloodsoaked raid at the Diaz school, which was being
used by protesters as a headquarters. The raid, which
left dozens injured after being kicked, punched and
beaten with batons, prompted an international outcry. It
emerged this week that senior police officers have been
placed under investigation for allegedly making false
statements as part of a cover-up." Interestingly, the
attendees of the summit included George W. Bush, Tony
Blair, & another man who is no stranger to the PRS
formula, President Vladimir Putin of Russia. The Black
Bloc serves the financial elite quite well actually. In
reality, it helps them use federal & local police (which
they control) to crack down on peaceful protestors whose
only threat is the power of their words.
To
the right we see members of the Black Bloc at an
anti-war protest in Washington D.C. in 2003 (top) &
2005. This group seems to have a convenient habit of
evading police as it moves through crowds of peaceful
protestors like a virus & wreaks havoc. Unfortunately,
peaceful protestors receive the backlash. Mainstream
information suggests that almost all of the people who
assemble at these rallies to protest the New World Order
are non-violent. But when the general public hears
stories or sees news flashes of this chaos, will they
think that a small specialized group, which was
obviously deliberately created for this purpose, is
responsible? Probably not. Most people are likely to
think that protestors "in general" are responsible.
So
this seems to be a multi-attack by the Establishment.
First to physically & mentally punish those who oppose
them with physical violence & caged speech zones.
Second, to lawfully limit their right to free speech.
Finally, to associate peaceful protestors with, what is
obviously intended to be, a terrorist squad of fake &
deluded protestors dressed in black masks. Although this
may sound ridiculous, consider their other actions which
can't be denied. This is how they
think!
Undercover police officers may also be used by the
financial elite to provoke violence. On August 21, 2007,
the Toronto Star declared, "Protesters are accusing
police of using undercover agents to provoke violent
confrontations at the North American leaders' summit...
Such accusations," they said, "have been made before
after similar demonstrations but this time the alleged
"agents provocateurs" have been caught on camera." The
Star described a YouTube video which showed three masked
men (at least one holding a rock) who attempted incite
violence. The three were apparently exposed as agent
provocateurs by some experienced genuine protestors.
"Rather than leave, the three actually start edging
closer to the police line, where they appear to engage
in discussions," depicted the Star. The video shows them
being handcuffed & taken away.
According to the Star, photographs taken of the
provocateurs during their staged arrest showed clearly
that they had, not similar boots, but the exact same
type of boots as the uniformed police. The article
continued, "Police confirm that only four protesters
were arrested during the summit--two men and two women.
All have been charged with obstruction and resisting
arrest." However, "The three [alleged provocateurs] do
not appear to have been arrested or charged with any
offence," the Star described. The "Video," echoed the
Globe & Mail, "also shows the three eventually being led
quietly away to police vans," but by contrast, according
to witnesses, genuine protestors were roughed up &
dragged away. The Star quoted one protester who stated,
"But we see very clearly in that video three (other) men
being arrested." He asked "How do (police) account for
these three people being taken in, being arrested? Where
did they go?"
"The Mounties and Quebec provincial police [SQ] deny
using agents provocateurs at this week's Montebello
summit," wrote the Globe & Mail, "despite incriminating
video evidence that suggests undercover cops tried to
incite violence. The denials yesterday did nothing to
quell mounting outrage over police tactics.
Anti-globalization and union activists joined with
opposition politicians to demand an independent
investigation. ... "I confirm [to] you that there are no
agents provocateurs in the Sûreté du Québec," Constable
Melanie Larouche said."
CBC
News later reported that the SQ (Quebec Police) admitted
that the alleged provocateurs were theirs. "Quebec
provincial police admitted Thursday that three of their
officers disguised themselves as demonstrators during
the protest at the North American leaders summit,"
stated CBC. But instead of admitting that they were
discovered when they attempted to provoke violence, the
police claimed that they were identified as undercover
police when they
refused to throw objects. "Police said the three
undercover officers were only at the protest to locate
and identify non-peaceful protesters in order to prevent
any incidents," said CBC.
It's clear to me that in addition to federal & local law
enforcement fighting crime, they also act as a private
security force for multi-national corporations. They are
the financial elite's private army & ensure their
continual rule. For those of you who wish to engage in
peaceful anti-globalization or corporate protest, you
can count on the financial elite using federal & local
law enforcement to stage a barrage of illegal acts,
using individual informants, the Black Bloc, or other
groups. Their activities include framings, provoking
violence, engaging in unnecessary violence, & using
informants to instigate violence. When examined within
the context of the
Problem-Reaction-Solution formula, the chaos
resulting from these activities appears to further
globalist political objectives, by providing an excuse
(solution), which allows them to
legally neutralize dissent.
How
can we retain the protest rights we still have? For as
long as the government is controlled by corporations, a
permanent solution won't be possible. Their onslaught
will continue in a variety of forms. But letting fellow
protestors know that these tactics may be used is
probably a good idea. In addition to making legal
arrangements for a big anti-globalism protest,
contacting key people & groups in the area & letting
them know that you're aware of this formula, may help.
I
realize that you'd in essence be contacting some of the
very people who would be complicit in the creation of
the staged chaos. And if you do this, you may enjoy a
protest without framings, but there will probably be
other consequences. Because what you've done is exposed
one of their most effective tactics. But the hour is
late. Protestors are already being labeled potential
terrorists. It's obvious to me that their objective is
to eventually outlaw protests in general, by linking
them to these state-run terrorist blocs. So,
repercussions & all, letting them know that
you know, may temporarily
delay them from reaching their goal.
-Sources-
The chaos demonstrated by the Black Bloc:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
Most demonstrators were peaceful:
The Associated Press, Seattle officials declare
no-protest zone around world trade talks, http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=4228
protestors were mainly peaceful:
BBC News, The Battle of Seattle, A city under civil
emergency December 2, 1999, Paul Reynolds, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/547581.stm
describes the Black Bloc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_bloc
Just as other groups: Wall Street
And The Rise Of Hitler, Professor Antony C. Sutton; The
Shadows Of Power, James Perloff
an agent provocateur as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur
the masked figures roamed: BBC
News, The Battle of Seattle, A city under civil
emergency December 2, 1999, Paul Reynolds
The so-called "black bloc" anarchists:
Prison Planet, Canadian Police
Caught Attempting To Stage Riots, August 24, 2007, Paul
Joseph Watson http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/240807_stage_riots.htm
Seattle Police Department said riots:
BBC News, Seattle police tactics
under scrutiny, December 2, 1999, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/547302.stm
Mayor of Seattle Paul Schell: PBS,
National Guard helps restore order, December 1, 1999,
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/international/july-dec99/wto_mayor_12-1.html
a judge upheld the WTO no-protest zone:
The Associated Press, Federal
court upholds WTO no-protest zone, October 31, 2001,
http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15273
These zones are areas set aside:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
These drastic changes: Ibid; San
Francisco Gate, Quarantining dissent, How the Secret
Service protects Bush from free speech, January 4, 2004,
James Bovard, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/01/04/INGPQ40MB81.DTL
a cell of concrete walls: Ibid (Wikipedia)
literally out of sight: Ibid
CBS described one man: CBS News,
Silencing Voices Of Dissent, December 4, 2003, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/04/eveningnews/main586959.shtml
Secret Service visits the location:
San Francisco Gate, Quarantining
dissent, How the Secret Service protects Bush from free
speech, January 4, 2004, James Bovard
the Italian police planted cocktail bombs:
UK Guardian, Italian police
'framed G8 protesters', June 22, 2002, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/22/globalisation.rorycarroll
room full of cracked skulls:
Financial Times, Inside the Black Bloc, October 15 2001,
James Harding, http://specials.ft.com/countercap/FT3BG4GLUSC.html
the police improvised lies: UK
Guardian, Italian police 'framed G8 protesters', June
22, 2002
Protesters are accusing police:
Toronto Star, Police accused of using provocateurs at
summit August 21, 2007, http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/248608
led quietly away to police vans:
The Globe & Mail (Canada), Police Planted Provocateurs,
Protesters Say, August 23, 2007, Joan Bryden, http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/23/3368/
The Star quoted one protester:
Toronto Star, Police accused of using provocateurs at
summit August 21, 2007
The Mounties and Quebec provincial police:
The Globe & Mail (Canada), Police
Planted Provocateurs, Protesters Say, August 23, 2007,
Joan Bryden
CBC News later reported that: CBC
News, Quebec police admit they went undercover at
Montebello protest, August 23, 2007, http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/08/23/police-montebello.html
labeled potential terrorists: The
Village Voice, J. Edgar Hoover Back at the 'New' FBI,
Classified FBI Bulletin Reveals Tactics at Protests,
December 4, 2003, Nat Hentoff
Concealment for False Flag Operations
Drills & sting operations may be run in
conjunction with these state-sponsored
terrorist acts, as a cover in case they get
caught, or as a smokescreen to cause
confusion. Remember how the real bomb found
during the Russian Apartment Bombings was
dismissed as being part of a drill? Also,
during both the first World Trade Center
bombing in 1993, & the bombing of the Murrah
Federal Building in 1995, the FBI & BATF
were working with the alleged terrorists
under a sting operation. When their
connections to these terrorist acts are
discovered, they can always claim they were
incompetent during a drill or sting
operation gone bad.
In a December 9, 1999 article entitled, The
FBI and the mad bombers, WorldNetDaily,
proclaimed, "The most sensible conclusion
anyone came to after examining evidence like
this is that the Oklahoma City bombing was a
sting operation that went wrong. But,
incredibly, the same conclusion can be drawn
about the [first] World Trade Center
bombing." They continued, "the tentacles of
funding, control and conspiracy always seem
to lead right back to the
government--whether it's the FBI, the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms or some
other similar agency. This is the case with
the most dramatic bombings in the recent
history of our country--from Oklahoma City
to the World Trade Center."
There are some major unanswered questions
regarding what occurred on 911. To cover
this subject well requires a separate report
or an entire book.(*) But an independent
investigation which is not headed by a
member of the Council on Foreign Relations
or related group is required. On 911 the CIA
ran a drill that included a plane flying
into a building, which created confusion &
caused NORAD to stand-down for the first
time in its 50-year history. "In what the
government describes as a bizarre
coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency
was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in
which an errant aircraft would crash into
one of its buildings," stated the Boston
Globe on August 21, 2002, in an articled
entitled, Agency planned exercise on Sept.
11 built around a plane crashing into a
building.
"Adding to the coincidence," continued the
Globe, "American Airlines Flight 77 ...
[which] was hijacked and crashed into the
Pentagon ... took off from Dulles at 8:10
a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the
exercise was to begin." Art Haubold, a
spokesperson for the National Reconnaissance
Office (NRO) stated, "It was just an
incredible coincidence that this happened to
involve an aircraft crashing into our
facility... As soon as the real world events
began, we canceled the exercise." The NRO
works with the CIA, NSA, DIA, & the military
to build & monitor reconnaissance
satellites.
Describing how an FBI informant named Emad
A. Salem infiltrated an Arab group in New
York, to coax them into bombing the world
trade center in 1993, WorldNetDaily wrote,
"When he was asked to assemble the bomb, he
went to the FBI to ask for harmless powder
to avoid a catastrophe." But instead he was
given materials to build a
live bomb! "To
make a long, complicated story short and
simple," said WorldNetDaily, "The FBI spent
$3 million of your tax money to blow up the
World Trade Center. The story's essentially
the same at Waco, Ruby Ridge and other
government-made disasters."
Conclusion
There are many, many other documented
historical examples of PRS in practice, as
well as countless others which have not yet
been officially recognized.(**) This formula
is being used on a variety of levels to
further the New World Order political
agenda. It's probably one of the most used
tactic to bring about massive change.
Although it's simple in theory, most people
don't think along these lines, because they
themselves would never resort to such a
tactic. But it's used over & over again by
the various governments which are controlled
by the financial elite. Always under the
guise of aiding & protecting the people.
Therefore, learning how to recognize when
this formula is being used will prove to be
a useful skill.
These acts may not make sense if viewed as
isolated incidents. But when examined as
essential steps in establishing a
dictatorship, they begin to make sense. They
also become clearer when a couple of things
are considered. First, that federal law
enforcement & most local law enforcement,
are controlled by the financial elite. Most
officers are loyal patriots, & may not be
aware of a hidden agenda. But there are
plenty of others who have been hired
specifically to carry out these kinds of
activities, & they are used to further this
political movement. Second, this chaos is
necessary in order to pass subversive
legislation which allows the financial elite
to install a "legal" dictatorship. In other
words, portions of federal & local law
enforcement are used as a type of terrorist
network for people of tremendous wealth.
This can all be done & covered-up for
reasons of national security. Presumably,
these are the same lower-level psychopaths
that the financial elite are now using to
torture & murder their enemies globally,
with state-run Gang Stalking & Directed
Energy Weapons.
It would not surprise me in the least, if a
wave of crime was arranged during the late
70s in order to jump-start these citizen
brigades. First they may have started with
genuine threats, & still do target them to
give the Hidden Evil the appearance of
legitimacy. Bogus statistics may even be
used to justify its continuation. But it's
clear to me that the primary purpose for
this program is to help establish a global
fascist state. Because we now understand
that it's a matter of public record that
worse scenarios were considered for
political purposes, this is not completely
speculation. In fact, the evidence suggests
that these are exactly the types of things
that these people do.
So, whenever a crisis occurs, or the threat
of a crisis looms, or a series of crimes
unfold which is hyped by the media,
understand that the psychopaths who control
the NATO governments may be attempting to
terrorize you into accepting new
legislation. If a new bill is introduced you
should be skeptical. On the surface, it's
guaranteed to appear useful. And almost
certainly, it will have a helpful-sounding
name (Semantic Deception).(***) The
Establishment's cheerleaders in the
mainstream news will even try to convince
you that it's a sensible change.
If this happens, if possible, examine the
bill & read related articles on various
independent media outlets to learn what it
really means.
Just a few of the questions you may want to
ask yourself include: Are freedoms being
lost? Are parts of the constitution being
attacked? Who benefits? Does this in any way
further world government? If the solution
ultimately results in more control & less
civil liberties, the crisis may have been a
PRS operation.
"When will this insanity end?" asked
WorldNetDaily. "What is the overall
objective of the FBI and government? Are
these activities actually designed to thwart
terrorism or encourage it? Who benefits most
from terrorist activity?" They continued,
"Americans might be shocked to learn that
their government is involved in such
escapades. But those who study history
should expect such things. It's been going
on since the beginning of time. Planting
seeds of fear among the people only helps
those in government remain in power and grab
more control over people's lives." They
conclude, "Remember this the next time you
hear about a so-called "terrorist
incident.""
Most of us would never give up our personal
freedoms--unless we were required to in
exchange for protection against a threat...
In the documentary, The Capitalist
Conspiracy, author G. Edward Griffin asked,
"But what is the best way to sell big
government & then world government to a
people like ours?" To answer his own
question, he described a process where the
financial elite deliberately create
problems, & then offer only those solutions
that result in the expansion of government.
Giving up personal liberties, says Griffin,
can be accomplished by creating conditions
"so frightful at home & abroad that the
abandonment of personal liberties & national
sovereignty will appear as a reasonable
price for a return to domestic tranquility &
world peace." To setup a police state, he
says, requires the creation of, "chaos,
crime & anarchy in the streets." And to
convince the people of the benefits of
"world government" requires the constant
threat of war. He finishes, "as they say in
revolutionary circles, "the real action, is
in the reaction.""
-Sources-
during both the first World Trade Center
bombing: The New York
Times, Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb
Used in Trade Center Blast, October 28,
1993, Ralph Blumenthal; WorldNetDaily, The
FBI and the mad bombers, December 09, 1999,
Joseph Farah
The most sensible conclusion:
Ibid (WorldNetDaily)
In what the government describes:
Boston Globe
(Associated Press), Agency planned exercise
on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing
into a building, August 21, 2002, John J.
Lumpkin; Toronto Star, "Northern Guardian":
The Scene at NORAD on Sept. 11, December 9,
2001, Scott Simmie, http://www.oilempire.us/norad.html
The NRO works with:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Reconnaissance_Office
Describing how an FBI informant:
WorldNetDaily, The FBI
and the mad bombers, December 09, 1999,
Joseph Farah
But there are plenty of others:
Techniques used to
silence critics, Ted L. Gunderson, FBI
Senior Special Agent In Charge (Ret)
When will this insanity end:
WorldNetDaily, The FBI
and the mad bombers, December 09, 1999,
Joseph Farah
the best way to sell big government:
Capitalist Conspiracy:
An Inside View of International Banking, G.
Edward Griffin