THE WORLD OF LAO TZU is totally different from the worlds of philosophy,
religion, ethics. It is not even a way of life. Lao Tzu is not teaching
something -- he is that something. He is not a preacher, he is a presence. He
has no doctrine for you -- he has only himself to offer and share.
Had he been a philosopher, things would have been easy -- you could have
understood him. He is a mystery because he is not a philosophy. He is not even
an anti-philosophy, because both depend on logic. He is absurd. Philosophies
depend on logic, anti-philosophies also depend on logic -- so the
anti-philosophies are also nothing but philosophies. Nagarjuna, a great
anti-philosopher, is still a philosopher. He talks, he argues, he discusses in
the same way as any philosopher. He discusses against philosophy, argues
against philosophy, but the argument is the same. And logic is a whore.
There is a story; one of Lao Tzu's greatest disciples, Lieh Tzu, reports
it... Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu and Lieh Tzu -- they are the three pillars of the
world of Tao. Lao Tzu goes on talking in epigrams, maxims; he does not even
elaborate. But Lieh Tzu and Chuang Tzu, being disciples of Lao Tzu, cannot
argue. They go on telling parables, stories, analogies. This word has to be
continuously remembered: Tao cannot be explained, only analogies can be given
-- indications. Tao cannot be discussed, it can only be shown. So a deep
sympathetic heart is needed -- it is not a question of the mind at all.
Lieh Tzu reports a story, that in his town once it happened: the richest man
of the town was crossing the river and the river was in flood. And there arose
a great storm and just in midstream the boat overturned. Somehow the boatman
escaped, but he couldn't save the rich man. The rich man was drowned. A great
search was made.
One fisherman found the body -- the dead body -- but he asked a fantastic
price for it and would not give it up for less. The family was not willing to
give so much just for a dead body so they went to a logician, a lawyer, a
legal adviser, to ask what to do. Could something legally be done?
The lawyer said, "You don't be worried. First give me my fee and then I will
show you the way." So the lawyer took his fee and then said, "Hold on. He
cannot sell the dead body to anybody else; he will have to yield, because
nobody will purchase that body -- so you just hold on."
Two, three days passed. The family followed the advice. The fisherman became
worried because now the body was stinking, and he started feeling that it was
better now to yield and accept whatsoever they gave. It had become a problem,
nobody else would purchase the body -- he also felt it. So how could he
bargain? But before deciding anything, he also went to the legal adviser --
the same man.
He said, "First give me the fee and I will give you the advice." He took his
fee and said, "Hold on! The family cannot purchase the body from anywhere else
-- they will have to yield."
Logic is a whore, a prostitute. It can be for, it can be against. It belongs
to nobody. So logic can be for philosophy and logic can be against philosophy.
Lao Tzu is not an anti-philosopher because he is not a logician at all.
Buddha is anti-philosophic: he argues against it. Nagarjuna is
anti-philosophic: he argues against it. Not Lao Tzu. He does not argue at all,
he simply states. He is not after you to convince you -- no, not Lao Tzu.
Everybody else seems to be in some way trying to convince you but not Lao Tzu.
He simply states and does not bother whether you are convinced or not.
But his seduction is great. He seduces. He persuades. Not trying to convince,
he convinces you deep down in the heart and you cannot refute him because he
gives no argument. That's the beauty and that's his power. He simply states a
fact. And he is not seeking converts, and he is not ready to make you a
follower -- no. Even if you are ready he will not accept you. But he seduces.
His seduction is very subtle and indirect. His seduction is non-aggressive.
His seduction is feminine.
There are two types of seduction. When a man seduces a woman, he is
aggressive. He tries in every way, takes the initiative, sets a trap; he makes
all the efforts that he can make. A woman seduces in a totally different way.
She does not take the initiative, she does not set any trap, she does not go
after the man; in fact, she pretends that she is not much interested. The man
can fail, but the woman never fails -- that is the feminine seduction. Her
trap is very subtle. You cannot get out of it; it has no loopholes. And
without chasing you, she chases you. She haunts you in your dreams -- never
knocks on your door, but haunts you in your dreams; never shows any interest
but becomes the deepest fantasy in your being. That is the feminine trick. And
Lao Tzu is a great believer in the feminine mind. We will come across it.
So remember... Lao Tzu's world is not of logic but analogy. Logic is
apparent, direct -- either you have to be convinced or you have to convince
the opponent; either you have to follow it, become a follower, or you become
the enemy. You have to choose. With logic your mind has to be active. It is
easy, nothing is difficult about it. Everybody argues. More or less, everybody
is a logician; good or bad, everybody is a philosopher.
If you want to understand Lao Tzu that old way won't help. You will have to
put your logic aside because he is not chasing you as a logician, he is not
arguing against you -- if you argue against him, it will be ridiculous because
he has not argued at all. He simply gives an analogy.
What is analogy? If I have a certain experience that you don't have, then how
am I to describe it to you? The only way is an analogy: some experience that
you have -- it is not exactly the same as one that I have, but some similarity
exists. So I say that it is like the experience you have -- not exactly like
it, not exactly the same, but a small similarity exists. That small similarity
understood will become the bridge.
That's why those who have come to the ultimate ecstasy say it is like two
lovers in deep embrace, it is like two lovers in deep orgasm, it is like when
the sex act comes to a peak. This is analogy. They are not saying that it is
this. No. They are not saying anything like that. They are simply saying that
your experience has nothing else which can become a bridge.
Jesus says, "God is love." This is an analogy. In your life the highest is
love. In God's being the lowest is love. The lowest of the divine and the
highest of the human meet; that is the boundary. The highest that humanity can
reach is love; it is lowest for the divine, just the feet of the divine. But
from there, if the feet are found, you can find the whole God. That's why
Jesus says, "Love is God." Not that love is God, but in your experience
nothing else exists through which an analogy can be made.
So don't take Lao Tzu verbally and literally; these are all analogies. If he
says "The spirit of the valley," this is an analogy. He is saying something --
not exactly about the valley, because the valley you know -- through the
valley he is giving you a feeling of something that you don't know. From that
which you know he is bringing you to that which you don't know. Analogy means
a reference to the known to explain the unknown. When he says "The spirit of
the valley," he means many things.
An analogy is always very pregnant. Logic is always narrow, analogy wide,
infinite. The more you search in it, the more you can find through it. Logic
is exhaustible, analogy never. That's why books like TAO TE CHING or BHAGAVAD
GITA or Jesus' SERMON ON THE MOUNT you can go on reading and reading and
reading -- they are inexhaustible. You can go on finding more and more because
they are analogies. The more you grow the more you can see in them; the more
you can see in them the more you grow; the more you grow the more you can see
again. So these books are not books: they have a life of their own, they are
alive phenomena. And you cannot read them once and be finished with them; no,
that is not the way. A logical book can be read once and be finished,
understood, you can throw it in the rubbish. But a book of analogy is poetry:
it changes with your moods, it changes with your insight, it changes with your
growth. It gives you different visions in your different states of mind.
The analogy remains the same -- for example, "Love is God." A man who has
never known anything except sex and who has thought that sex is love...
In the West it is happening too much. Now for the sexual act they say
"lovemaking." This "lovemaking" or "making love" is absolutely foolish -- you
cannot make love, love is not an act. Sex is an act; love is not an act, it is
a state of being -- you can be in it but you cannot make it. You fall in it,
it is not an effort. Sex can be made, not love. A prostitute can give you sex,
not love -- because how can you make love on order for money? Impossible! How
can you make love for money? It comes on its own. It has its own mysterious
ways. You cannot control it, you can only be controlled by it. You cannot
possess it, you can only be possessed by it. Sex can be done, not love. You
can make sex but you cannot make love -- you can only be in love.... So a man
or a woman who has thought that sex is love and the sexual act is the act of
love will think, when Jesus says, "Love is God" -- and of course there is no
other way for them to think because this is their analogy -- that sex is God.
In Sweden they are making a film now on the love life of Jesus because they
think that a man who says, "Love is God" must mean that sex is God. And this
film is going to be one of the most profane of acts, the unholiest possible,
because in the film they are trying to depict a Jesus making love in their
sense -- moving into sexual acts. Now no country is ready to allow them to
make the film. But they will make it -- it is difficult now to stop them. The
love life of Jesus to them means just sex life.
You understand an analogy from your standpoint. The analogy can give you only
as much as you can put into it. A man who has loved, not only sexually but
totally... because sex is a local phenomenon, physical; there is nothing wrong
in it, but it is not total. When it becomes total and you love a person in
totality, not only sexually -- the attraction is not only physical but
spiritual also -- not only bodily -- not that the body is denied in it but the
attraction is greater, and bodily attraction is just a smaller circle in it --
then you will understand "love is God" in a different way. The analogy will
become deeper for you.
But if you have known love which is beyond sex, in which sex simply
disappears and the whole sexual energy is transformed into ecstasy -- if you
have known that love then "love is God" will have a different meaning for you.
So analogy depends on you. And a book of analogy like Lao Tzu's has to be
read again and again -- it is a life work. You cannot simply read it in a
paperback and throw it away. It is a treasure to be carried; it is a lifelong
work; it is a lifelong discipline to enter the analogy.
Logic is superficial. You can understand Aristotle, there is nothing much.
But when you come to Lao Tzu... for the first time you may even miss that
there is something, but by and by Lao Tzu will haunt you. His attraction is
feminine. By and by he will catch hold of your being -- you have only to allow
him. In logic you have to fight; in analogy you have to be sympathetic, you
have to allow it, only then can the analogy flower. So only in deep sympathy
and reverence, in deep faith and trust, can Lao Tzu be understood. There is no
If you come to Lao Tzu through your mind you will never come to him. You will
go round and round and round -- you will never touch his being. Come to him
through the heart. Analogy is for the heart; logic is for the mind.
Lao Tzu is more a poet. Remember that. You don't argue with a poet -- you
listen to the poetry, you absorb the poetry, you chew it, you let it move
inside your being, you let it become a part of your blood and bones, you
digest it. You forget the words, you forget the poetry completely, but the
fragrance becomes part of you. You may not remember what that poet was singing
but the song has been retained: the flavor of it, the fragrance, the
significance has entered you. You have become pregnant.
Lao Tzu can be understood only if you become pregnant with him. Allow him.
Open the doors. He will not even knock, because he is not aggressive. He will
not try to argue because he does not believe in argument. He is not a
mind-being at all, he is absolutely a heart-being. He is simple, his analogies
are that of a villager -- but alive, radiant, vital. If you allow him,
suddenly you will be transformed -- just an understanding, a
heart-understanding, and you will be transformed by him.
The second thing to remember is that Lao Tzu is not a religious man in the
ordinary sense. He is not a theologian. He is not a religious man at all in
the way you understand the word. He has never gone to the temple, never
worshiped, because he found that the whole existence is the temple and the
whole life is the worship. He is not a fragmentary being. He does not divide
life, he lives it as an undivided river.
You divide: one hour for the temple, every week you go to church. Sunday is
the religious day and religion becomes by and by a Sunday affair -- the six
working days are not touched by it. You are very cunning! -- Sunday the
holiday, Sunday the religious day, when you are not working. You can be honest
easily when you are not working; you can be honest easily when you are not in
the shop; you can be honest easily when you are resting in the sun; you can be
honest easily when you are listening to the sermon in the church. That is
nothing, no problem. The six working days, they create the real problem -- you
cannot be religious then. So this is a trick. This Sunday is a trick to avoid
religion. You have made airtight compartments in your life. Religion has its
own place on Sunday, and then, then you are free for six days to be as
irreligious as possible.
Hindus have their own ways, Mohammedans their own, Christians their own: how
to avoid religion. And these people you call religious! They are the avoiders.
They go to the temple and they pray. When they pray look at them, at their
faces. They look so beautiful. But when they come out of the church or the
temple they are no more the same. They are different.
Tolstoy has written a small story, not a story really. It is a fact, it
happened, an incident.
Tolstoy went one day into the church, early in the morning. It was dark and
he was surprised to find that the richest man of the town was praying and
confessing before God and saying that he was a sinner. Of course Tolstoy
became interested. And he was relating his sins: how he had deceived his wife
and had been unfaithful, and how he had been in love relationships and affairs
with other women, others' wives.
Tolstoy became intrigued. He came nearer and nearer. And he was relating with
much gusto, confessing to God: "I am a sinner and unless you forgive me there
is no way for me. And how I have been exploiting! And how I have been robbing
people! I am a sinner and I don't know how to change myself. Unless your grace
descends there is no possibility for me." And tears were flowing.
Then suddenly he became aware that there was somebody else there. He looked.
He recognized -- by this time the day was dawning -- and he became very angry
and he said to Tolstoy: "Remember! These things I have said to God, not to
you. And if you say these things to anybody I will drag you to the court for
defaming me. So remember that you have never heard these things. This was a
personal dialogue between me and God and I was not aware that you were here."
A different face before God and a totally different face before the world....
Religion is a compartment -- airtight. This is a trick to avoid it; this is a
way to be religious without being religious at all -- a deception.
Lao Tzu is not religious in that way at all. He is a simple man. He is not
even aware that he is religious -- how can a religious man be aware that he is
religious? Religion is like breathing to him. You become aware of breathing
only when something goes wrong, when it is hard to breathe, when you have
asthma or some other type of breathing trouble. Otherwise you never know,
never become aware that you breathe. You simply breathe, it is so natural.
Lao Tzu is naturally religious, he is not even aware of it. He is not like
your saints who are practicing religion. No, he doesn't practice: he has
allowed the total to take possession. He lives it, but he does not practice
it. Religion is not a discipline for him, it is a deep understanding. It is
not something imposed from the outside, it is something that flows from
within. There is not a bit of distance between him and religion.
He is not religious in the sense that you understand. He is not a saint
because he has never practiced saintliness. He has not forced it; it is not
his character. A real religious man has no religious character -- cannot have
it because character is a device of the irreligious. Try to understand it: you
develop a character because you are afraid of your being; you develop morality
because you are afraid of inner immorality; you force yourself into a certain
way of life because you know that if you live spontaneously and naturally you
will become a sinner, not a saint. You are afraid of your being; you impose a
character all around you. Character is an armor; it protects you from others
and it protects you from yourself. It is a citadel; you move in it. You speak
truth not because you have come to know the bliss of it; you speak truth
because you have been taught that if you don't, you will be thrown into hell.
Your theologians have tried to picture your God as the greatest sadist
possible -- throwing people into hell, into burning fire, into boiling oil.
This God seems to be a sadist. He needs a great psychological treatment -- he
seems to be the greatest torturer.
You are afraid of hell and you are ambitious for heaven -- the carrot of
heaven is hanging in front of you continuously. And your character is just a
device between heaven and hell -- a protection against hell and an effort to
achieve the ambition: heaven. How can you be religious if you are so afraid
and so ambitious?
A religious man is not ambitious at all. Ambition is the first thing that
drops from a religious man, because ambition means to be in the future and a
religious man is always here and now. He exists in the present, he has no
future to bother about. And he is not in any way afraid. He lives so totally,
how can he be afraid? The fear comes because you live fragmentarily. You have
not lived at all, that's why the fear.
Just try to understand the point. A man is afraid of death -- why? Do you
know that death is bad? How can you know unless you die? Do you know that
death is going to be worse than life? How can you know? It may be better than
life. Why are you afraid of death without knowing? How can one be afraid of
the unknown? It seems to be impossible. You can be afraid only of the known.
How can you be afraid of the unknown, the unfamiliar that you don't know at
all? No, you are not afraid of death. You have wrongly placed your fear in
death. You are really afraid of death because you have not been able to live
-- the fear is concerned with the unlived life. You are afraid that you have
not been able to live, love, and death is coming near, which will finish
everything. You will be no more, and you have not been able to love.
You are like a tree which has not flowered and the woodcutter is coming. The
tree feels afraid, not knowing what is going to happen. The fear is not coming
from death, the fear is coming from something which has not happened. The tree
knows well that the fruits have not come, the flowers have not come, it has
not bloomed. The tree has not known the spring yet; it has not danced with the
winds, it has not loved, it has not lived. This unlived life creates fear...
and the woodcutter is coming. And the woodcutter will come and there will be
no future. Death means no future. Past is gone, and no future -- and the
present is so narrow. Fear takes over, you tremble.
Fear is always of the unlived. If you live totally you are unafraid of
anything. If death comes to me right now I am ready. I have lived. Everything
is complete, nothing is incomplete. Death cannot destroy. If something were
incomplete then I would like death to wait a little, but everything is
complete. I have taken my bath this morning, I have talked to you, whatsoever
was to happen has happened. I am completely ready. If death comes I am ready,
I will not even look back once because there is nothing to look at, everything
is complete. Whenever anything is complete you are free of it. A life really
lived -- one becomes free of it. A life not lived -- you can never be free of
it. You can go to the caves, to the Himalayas, to Tibet -- you can move
anywhere, but you will never be free, and fear will always be there.
Fear and freedom cannot exist together. When freedom comes -- and freedom
comes only when you have lived, bloomed, everything complete and finished --
then for what do you hanker to live longer? Not even a single moment is
needed. Then fear disappears.
Your religion is based on fear. It is not in fact religion. It is pseudo, it
is false, it is just a deception. Lao Tzu is not religious in the sense that
you are religious or you feel other people are religious. Lao Tzu is religious
in a totally different way. His quality is different. He is simple, he lives
innocently moment to moment. He also does not talk about God -- because what
is the use? God is not a word. How can you talk about him? He lives him, he
does not talk about him. He enjoys him, he celebrates him, it is not a
cerebral phenomenon. He dances. He drinks him. He lives him. So what is the
point of talking about him?
This is my observation: that people always talk about things which they don't
There is a Sufi story:
A great king used to come to a fakir, a mystic beggar. But he was surprised
because whenever he came the mystic would talk about money, kingdom, politics,
and he was there to talk about God, meditation, religion.
So one day he said, "Forgive me, but this I cannot understand. I come here to
talk about God, religion, meditation, SAMADHI And this is ridiculous -- that
I, a man of the world, come to talk about samadhi, enlightenment, and you, a
religious man -- supposedly religious, because now I have become suspicious --
you always, whenever I come, talk about the kingdom and politics and money and
thousands of things, but always of the world. How do you explain it?"
The fakir laughed. He said, "There is nothing to explain. It is simple. You
talk about things you don't know. I talk about things I don't know. It is
simple. Why should I talk about God? I know. Why should you talk about
kingdom? You are a king. You know."
Lao Tzu doesn't talk about God, doesn't even mention him, not even once. Has
he forgotten him? Is he against him? No. He lives him so totally that even to
remember would be a sacrilege. To talk about God would be talking about such a
deep phenomenon, it would be a betrayal.
It would be a betrayal, I say to you, to talk about God. It is such an
intimate phenomenon; it is between him and the whole. It is just like lovers
don't like to talk about their love. And people who talk about their love --
you can be certain they have no love life. Love is such an intimate phenomenon
nobody wants to talk about it. Poets talk about it because they don't know.
They go on writing poems, that is their fantasy -- but they have not known.
Lovers keep quiet. Lovers don't talk about love at all. There is nothing to
talk about -- they know it. And by knowing it they know also that it cannot be
talked about; it would be a betrayal.
Lao Tzu is religious in a totally different way.
Now, try to enter this sutra with me:
TAO IS A HOLLOW VESSEL,
AND ITS USE IS INEXHAUSTIBLE,
HOLLOWNESS IS ONE OF THE KEY WORDS in Lao Tzu. He talks about hollowness
again and again. Hollowness means space; hollowness means vastness; hollowness
You live in a house, but your concept of the house is the walls. Lao Tzu's
concept of the house is the space within, not the walls. He says: Walls are
not the house. How can you live in the walls? You live in the emptiness, not
in the walls. The hollowness -- that is the real house. But when you think
about the house you think about the structure that is around the hollowness.
That's why a palace and a hut look different to you. Not for Lao Tzu --
because the hollowness is the same. If you look at the walls then of course a
hut is a hut and a palace is a palace. But if you look at the innermost
hollowness, which is the real house -- because only hollowness can house you,
not the walls -- then there is no difference between a hut and palace. There
is no rich hollowness and no poor hollowness: all hollownesses are the same,
they are equal. But there are rich walls and poor walls.
Once you understand this, then many things will become possible because this
is an analogy with infinite potentiality and meaning. When you look at a
person do you look at the body? Then you are looking at the walls. That is not
the real man -- the real man is the inner hollowness. A body can be beautiful,
ugly, ill, healthy, young, old, but the inner hollowness is always the same.
Then you don't look at the bodies, then you look at the hollowness within.
Everywhere Lao Tzu finds the analogy. You go to the market to purchase an
earthen pot or a golden pot. The golden pot differs from the earthen pot --
just the walls differ -- but the inner hollowness is the same. And when a poor
man goes to the well and a rich man goes to the well -- the rich man with a
golden pot and the poor man with an earthen pot -- they go with the same
hollownesses. They carry the same water and when they fill their pots, not the
walls are used but the inner hollowness, the inner emptiness.
Lao Tzu says: Look at the inner, don't look at the outer. And the inner
hollowness is your being; the inner hollowness, the inner emptiness is your
being. That means your being is a non-being, because the word "being" gives
you a feeling that something is there inside. No, there is nobody inside --
all somebodiness is on the outside, inside is nobodiness, hollow. All ego is
just on the surface, inside is egolessness. Who is there inside? Once you know
you will laugh, you will say that the question is irrelevant.
There is nobody, exactly nothingness -- that's why you are vast, that's why
you are of the quality of Brahma. That's why you cannot find God anywhere --
because he is the hollowness of the whole and you go on looking for the body.
Somebody is looking for Krishna, somebody is seeking Christ, somebody is
seeking Mahavir -- all looking for bodies. Nobody is in search of the
hollowness; otherwise where do you need to go? The space surrounds you from
everywhere. This is God -- the space: the space in which you are born, the
space in which you live, the space in which you will dissolve.
A fish is born in the sea, the fish lives in the sea, the fish dies and
dissolves in the sea. The fish is nothing but seawater. You are exactly the
same. The hollowness is all around and the same hollowness is within. How can
there be two types of hollownesses? Impossible. Emptiness is always the same.
In a sinner exists the same hollowness as in a saint. The sinner has a label
on the outside of being a sinner, and the saint has a label on the outside of
being a saint. You are too attached to the walls; you don't see that walls are
Why do you call a man a saint? -- because he does something which you call
good. Why do you call a man a sinner? -- because he does something you call
bad. But all doing is on the outside, all actions are on the outside, they are
just paintings on the walls. But the inner hollowness -- can the inner
hollowness become impure by your acts? Can you make emptiness impure? Can you
make emptiness pure? Emptiness is simply emptiness. How can you make it pure
or impure? Emptiness remains untouched. If you cut me with a sword, you cut my
body but not me, because "me" means the inner emptiness. If I do something I
do it with the walls, but the inner emptiness is a nondoer. Remember this
analogy. It is a key word in Lao Tzu.
TAO IS A HOLLOW VESSEL,
AND ITS USE IS INEXHAUSTIBLE,
If Tao or God were not empty then their use could not be inexhaustible, then
some day they would be exhausted. And what God can be called God who is
exhaustible? One day that God will be dead, it will be exhausted. But in your
minds the concept of God has been created as a person sitting somewhere in the
skies and controlling. He is not controlling. He is not a person. In fact he
is not a he, and he is not a she also.
All our words are irrelevant because Tao is a vast hollowness, a vast space,
emptiness. Your logic will immediately arise in the mind: then how are things
there? Ask the physicists; now they have come to the same understanding as Lao
Tzu. Now they say that as we enter deeper and deeper into matter, matter
disappears. Finally it disappears completely. Now we don't know. Inside, it is
a hollowness. They were searching for the substance of matter; they searched
hard but now it has escaped completely, out of vision -- they cannot see where
it has gone. They searched for it first in the molecules, then they went
deeper into the atoms, then they divided the atom and went deeper into
electrons. Now matter has completely disappeared -- nothingness. Matter is
hollow. Even these walls of stone are hollow. That's why Hindus call the world
of matter illusion: it looks very solid and substantial and inside everything
Whenever you are silent, sitting with closed eyes watching inside, you will
feel a hollowness. Don't get scared. Physicists were chasing matter and they
came to hollowness, and the people who have been really seekers of a spiritual
dimension have also come to the hollowness. Then you become scared. If matter
is hollow it doesn't matter, but if you are also hollow, a hollow bamboo,
inside nothing but emptiness, you become afraid. If you become afraid you will
cling to the wall, and in the final analysis the wall is also hollow. This
existence is a vast emptiness, and that's the beauty of it.
In the night you go to sleep -- dreams arise out of nothing: beautiful
dreams, ugly dreams, nightmares which scare you to death. Dreams arise out of
nothing and they look so real. They look so authentically real, but when your
eyes open in the morning you cannot find them anywhere. From where did they
come? From where did they arise? And now where have they gone? You never think
about the phenomenon of the dream. If it can happen in the night, why not in
One of the disciples of Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, one night dreamed that he had
become a butterfly, fluttering, flying amidst flowers. And the next morning
when he awoke he was very sad.
His disciples asked, "What is the matter, Master? We have never seen you so
sad. What has happened? "
He said, "I am in such a quandary. I am in such a dilemma that it seems now
it cannot be solved."
The disciples said, "We have never seen any problem that you cannot solve.
Just say, what is the problem?"
Chuang Tzu said, "Last night I dreamed that I had become a butterfly, flying
in the garden, moving from one flower to another flower."
The disciples laughed. They said, "This is a dream, Master! "
Chuang Tzu said, "Wait, let me tell you the whole story. Now I am awake and I
am puzzled. A doubt has arisen. If Chuang Tzu can dream that he can become a
butterfly, why not the otherwise? A butterfly could dream that she had become
a Chuang Tzu. Now who is who? Am I a butterfly dreaming that I have become a
Because if it can happen that you can become a butterfly in a dream, then
what is the problem? A butterfly sleeping there this morning, resting, may be
dreaming that she is you. And how do you know who you are? If Chuang Tzu can
become a butterfly, why can't a butterfly become a Chuang Tzu? There seems to
be no impossibility about it.
Night dreams come out of nothingness and they look real; in the day, dreams
come out of nothingness and they look real. The only difference between the
night and the day is: the night dream is private and the day dream is public.
That is the only difference. In the night dream you cannot invite your friends
to be there -- it is private. In the day dream you can invite friends -- it is
public. The house in which you live in the day is public. If there is a
possibility of private dreaming there is a possibility of public dreaming. We
are here. If we all go to sleep there will be as many dreams as there are
people here: private. Nobody's dream will enter into anybody else's dream.
They will not clash with anybody, and everybody will forget about everybody
else; he will live in his dream and in his own dream-reality. Then you are
awake. You look at me and I am talking to you. This is a public dream, you are
all dreaming together. That is the only difference.
There is a possibility of a greater awakening -- when you awake out of the
public dream also. That is what enlightenment is. Then suddenly the whole
world is maya. This is what Lao Tzu is saying.
TAO IS A HOLLOW VESSEL,
AND ITS USE IS INEXHAUSTIBLE,
It is a vast emptiness and everything arises out of it and goes back to it,
falls back into it. And it is inexhaustible because it has no limits.
You may not be aware that the concept of zero was invented, discovered in
India, because India became aware that everything comes out of nothingness,
zero, and everything falls back into nothingness, to zero. The whole journey
is from zero to zero. So India coined the concept of zero, shunyam. And that
is the basis of all mathematics -- zero is the basis of all mathematics. If
zero is taken away the whole structure of mathematics falls down. With zero
the whole game starts -- you add one zero to the figure one, then the value of
the zero is nine because immediately one becomes ten, nine is born out of zero
immediately. You add two zeroes to one, the value is ninety-nine, immediately
one has become a hundred -- out of zero the whole structure builds up. Without
zero, mathematics disappears, and without mathematics the whole science
So if you ask me, zero is the root of all mathematics and of all science; you
cannot conceive of an Einstein without the concept of a zero. No, it is not
possible. All computers would stop immediately if you drop the concept of
zero, because without the zero they cannot work. Zero seems to be the most
substantial thing in the world. And what is a zero? A zero is simply zero,
nothing -- it is inexhaustible. You can take as many things out of it as you
want. Nine it can become, ninety-nine it can become, nine hundred and
ninety-nine it can become. Go on and on and it can become anything you like;
it is bottomless, fathomless. You cannot fathom it. One is limited. It has a
limitation, it has a fixed value to it. Two is limited -- all the nine digits
are limited, only the zero is an unlimited phenomenon. In fact the nine digits
cannot work without it. They come out of it, they grow out of it. This whole
existence comes out of zero, a hollowness.
Why this emphasis on hollowness? It is not a philosophical doctrine,
remember, it is simply an analogy -- Lao Tzu is trying to show you something.
He is trying to show you that unless you become hollow you will suffer,
because hollowness is your reality. With unreality you will suffer.
And that is the meaning of meditation: to become hollow, to be empty inside.
Not even a thought flutters -- no content, just space. Suddenly all misery has
disappeared, because misery exists in thoughts; death has disappeared because
death exists in thoughts; the past has disappeared because the whole burden is
carried through thoughts; ambition disappears because how can you be ambitious
without thoughts? How can you be mad without thoughts? Have you ever seen a
madman who has no thoughts? In fact, a madman is a madman because he has too
many thoughts and he cannot hold them together: a whole crowd... too much to
bear. A madman is a great thinker. That is his trouble: he thinks too much,
and he thinks in many dimensions together. In his cart, in all directions,
horses are harnessed and he goes on in all directions, and he cannot stop
because he is not. He is so divided, so fragmentary, that he is not.
Only a hollowness can be undivided. Can you divide a hollowness? Everything
can be divided -- anything that is substantial can be divided. Self can be
divided, only no-self cannot be divided. That's why when Buddha reached to his
ultimate enlightenment he coined a word that was his invention: the word
anatta. It never existed before him. anatta means no-self. anatta means anatma.
anatta means you are not. anatta means not is, you are not. anatta means
The analogy is to indicate certain things: become hollow, be hollow. But the
whole teaching, the conditioning of society is against it. In the West they
say that if you are empty you will become a devil's workshop. An empty mind is
a devil's workshop. This is foolishness, extreme foolishness, because an empty
mind can never be a devil's workshop. If it is really empty, suddenly only God
is there and nothing else, because God is hollow. The devil is full of
thoughts, he is never empty. The devil has a mind; God has no mind. You can
become a devil's workshop -- the more you think the more you can become one!
If you don't think at all how can you become a devil's workshop? The devil
cannot enter a hollowness, he will be afraid of death -- because to enter into
emptiness is to die. He can enter you only if there are many thoughts -- then
he can hide in the crowd, then he can also become a thought in you.
An empty mind is God's mind -- it is no-mind. Become hollow, sit as a hollow
bamboo. Move as a hollowness, live as a hollowness, do whatsoever you have to
do but do it as if you are hollow inside. Then karmas will not touch you at
all; then your actions will not become a burden to you; then you will not be
entangled because a hollowness cannot be entangled.
THE SPIRIT OF THE VALLEY NEVER DIES.
THE SPIRIT OF THE VALLEY is the spirit of hollow-ness. What is a valley? --
it is a hollow thing. Go to the hills, you will find two things: peaks -- full
of rocks, filled, and valleys -- empty. The spirit of the valley is the spirit
of emptiness. Peaks come and go; valleys remain -- you cannot destroy
nothingness. Something can always be destroyed. If you are something you will
have to be born and die again and again. If you are nothing then how can you
be destroyed? How can you be created? You simply disappear out of the world of
forms to the formless; a valley means the world of the formless.
THE SPIRIT OF THE VALLEY NEVER DIES,
IT IS CALLED THE MYSTIC FEMALE.
These are all analogies. A woman is a valley, a man is a peak. A man enters
the woman, the woman simply allows. A man is an aggression, a woman is a
receptivity. A man tries to do, a woman simply waits for things to happen.
IT IS CALLED THE MYSTIC FEMALE.
These words have to be understood -- the mystic female -- because for Lao Tzu
that is the ultimate. Lao Tzu feels that the nature of existence is more like
a woman than like a man, because man comes out of woman, woman comes out of
woman. Man can even be discarded but woman cannot be discarded. Woman seems to
be a basic element. Man is a growth out of it. Woman seems to be more
elemental, more natural; man has something unnatural about him. If you ask the
biologists they say that man has a deep imbalance in his biology; woman is
symmetrical, balanced. That's why she looks more beautiful and round. Man has
corners, woman has no corners. A woman is a more balanced phenomenon, that's
why she never tries to invent something, to create something, to do something,
to be on the go -- no, she is never on the go. Man is always on the go. He has
to do something to prove that he is; he cannot simply accept himself. He
cannot simply be and enjoy. He has to go to the moon, and he has to go to the
top of Everest, and he has to do something. A deep imbalance is there, he
cannot simply sit and be. He becomes an adventurer, a scientist. A woman
simply enjoys being, she is happy with small things, she does not hanker for
the moon. And every woman thinks what foolishness it is: Why are you going to
the moon? You ask the wives of the astronauts, they simply cannot believe it.
Why? Why move in danger and death unnecessarily? What is wrong in being here?
Man is a vagabond, a gypsy. If the world were left to man there would be no
houses, only tents at the most. And he would be moving and moving from one
place to another. He cannot stay in one place, something deep inside him
forces him to move. He is not balanced; this imbalance is his madness. Look at
a woman. She is balanced. Her needs are small: somebody to love, somebody to
be loved by, food, shelter, a little warmth around, a home -- finished. Then
she is not worried about anything. No woman has created any science, no woman
has founded any religion. People come to me and ask why all religions were
created by man. Because man is tense, he has to do something or other. If he
becomes frustrated with this world he starts doing something with the other
world, but he has to do. He is never here and now, he cannot be here and now.
Lao Tzu has this analogy that the nature of existence is more feminine, it is
more balanced. Look at the trees, look at the birds singing, look at the
rivers flowing, look all around and watch -- you will find more feminineness
everywhere. Everything seems to be perfect at this moment. The trees are not
worried about the future, the birds are not worried about the future, the
rivers are simply moving so lazily, so silently -- as if they are not moving
at all. Nothing seems to be in a hurry.
That's why it happens every day: the man is honking the horn on the street
and the woman goes on saying from the window, "I'm coming. Just wait a
minute." Women have no time sense. They have watches, but they are ornamental
-- they are not watches really. They don't have any time sense because they
are not in a hurry. Time sense arises out of hurry and haste -- everything is
trembling and everything is at stake, as if one minute late and everything
will be lost. And if you ask the man, "Where are you going?" he will shrug his
shoulders -- just to the pictures, but honking the horn as if something great,
a life experience was going to be missed. And the woman goes on saying....
I have even heard one woman once. I was sitting with the husband in the car,
and really we were getting late and the husband was very worried. In fact he
need not have worried, he should not have worried, because it was my
appointment not his. I was getting late. But he was honking, and he was very
worried and perspiring and swearing at his wife. And the wife -- two or three
times she said, "I am coming" -- but her makeup was not complete. It is never
complete. She always comes somehow but it is incomplete, much could have been
done. She is so at ease with the mirror, with herself -- she is so at ease.
That is her world. Then the wife got angry, and she looked down from the
window and said, "I have told you one thousand times that I am coming in a
minute!" One thousand times! You cannot even say "I am coming" one thousand
times in one minute.
No time sense... the world moves without any time sense. Clocks and watches
don't exist with trees and rivers and mountains -- it is a timeless world.
Man exists with time, with a worry. Deep down the worry seems to be sexual:
the worry about achieving a sexual orgasm. Whenever a man is making love to a
woman he is worried whether he will be able to make it or not, worried whether
he will be able to satisfy the woman or not, worried whether he will be able
to prove that he is a man or not. The worry: an inner trembling, in a hurry
somehow to prove, and that's why he misses. Ejaculation is there but orgasm --
no. Orgasm is a different phenomenon: it happens only when you are not
worried, it happens only when you are not an achiever, it happens only when
you are not reaching for something, it happens in a deep relaxation, it
happens only when you are not in control -- but nature takes control. Then
your whole body throbs with an unknown bliss. Then every cell of your body
celebrates in a total ecstasy; then it is divine.
But man is worried, and that sexual worry is the root cause of all worries.
Then everywhere he is trying to prove himself.
There is no need to prove yourself. You are. You are perfect. No woman is
worried about proving; she takes it for granted that she is perfect. She lives
in a very relaxed way. Many husbands come to me and always their complaint is
that their wives are lazy. They are not lazy; they are enjoying! Whatsoever is
the case, they are not in a hurry. But comparatively they look lazy.
Lao Tzu says the nature of the existence is more like the female, more
feminine. And the analogy is beautiful. He is not saying that existence is
female -- remember this. This is not logic, he is not trying to prove that
existence is female. He is not for the lib movement -- no. He is simply giving
A man can also be feminine. A Buddha is feminine, a Lao Tzu is feminine, a
Jesus is feminine. Then he lives, he lives in the moment, unhurried; he enjoys
the moment unhurried.
Jesus says to his disciples: Look at the lilies in the field. How beautiful
they are! Even Solomon in all his glory was not so beautiful. But what is the
secret of the lilies? -- they are just flowering here and now. What will
happen the next moment is not a worry; the next moment has not entered into
their consciousness yet.
A man can live a feminine existence -- then he becomes a mystic. That is the
only way. So all mystics become in a certain way feminine. And they are the
real religious men, not the founders of religion.
Remember, this is a difference.... Buddha is not the founder of Buddhism --
no. His disciples are the founders. Jesus is not the founder of Christianity
-- no. His apostles, they are the founders. Mahavir is not the founder of
Jainism. Gautam, his disciple, who was a scholar and great pundit, was. These
are the men.
Jesus himself is feminine. To show this, in India we have never painted
avataras, teerthankaras, Buddhas, with beards and mustaches -- no -- just to
show this that they are feminine. Have you ever seen Ram with a mustache?
Krishna with a beard? It is not that they were somehow lacking in hormones.
They were not the third sex. They were men; beards existed. But this is just
an analogy. We have dropped the beards to show that they have become feminine:
the feminine mystic has come into being. They existed without any hurry, they
existed not as a tense man but as a non-tense woman, and you can feel around
them the feminine warmth, the roundness of a Buddha.
THE SPIRIT OF THE VALLEY NEVER DIES.
IT IS CALLED THE MYSTIC FEMALE.
THE DOOR OF THE MYSTIC FEMALE
IS THE ROOT OF HEAVEN AND EARTH.
THE DOOR OF THE MYSTIC FEMALE
IS THE ROOT OF HEAVEN AND EARTH...
And if you can find the key to open the door of the mystic female you have
opened the door of existence. Everybody has to enter that door non-tense,
balanced, satisfied, content -- that's the secret of feminine being.
When I say this there are two possibilities of misunderstanding: women can
misunderstand and think that they have nothing to do; men can misunderstand
and think that this Lao Tzu is not for them. No, it is for you both. But
remember... women are not pure women, they have lost the feminine mystique
themselves. They have to gain it again. It will be easier for them of course
to gain it than men, because man has gone farther away. And don't think that
if you are a man Lao Tzu is not for you -- he is particularly for you,
otherwise you will go farther and farther away from existence and life's
ecstasy. Everybody has to come back to the mother; that is the feminine
You are born out of the mother's womb, and you have to find the womb again in
existence. If you can find the womb again in existence, the same warmth, the
same life, the same love, the same care in existence -- then existence becomes
your home, your mother.
Hindus are better when they call their god "mother" -- mother Kali -- than
Christians and Mohammedans and Jews, who go on calling their god "father."
Those three religions are man-oriented, that's why they have been so violent.
Mohammedans and Christians have killed so many, they have been a catastrophe
on the earth. They have been murderers. In the name of religion they have been
only killing and doing nothing else. This is man-oriented religion.
Buddhism has not killed, Jainism has not killed, Hinduism has not killed,
because they are more and more inclined towards the feminine mystique. And you
cannot complain against Lao Tzu at all, with him there exists no organized
religion. Once a religion becomes organized, violence enters into it.
Organization is going to be violent, it has to fight its way, it is bound to
become male. Organization is male; religion is female.
I have heard an anecdote that a few disciples of the Devil came very worried
and said and told him, "Why are you sitting here? Our whole business is at
stake. A man has again become a Buddha, enlightened. We have to do something,
otherwise he will transform people -- and our world will be deserted, and who
will come to hell? Do something immediately! No time should be lost. A man has
again become a Buddha!"
The Devil said, "You don't worry. I work through the disciples. I have sent
some already, the disciples are on the way. They will surround him. They will
create an organization. And no need to worry: the organization will do
everything that we cannot do, and they always do it better. I have learned it
through history. I will create a church... and I will not be involved in it at
all. In fact, they do it on their own. I just simply encourage and help."
Once the pope is there, Christ is forgotten; once the church is there, the
Buddha is killed and murdered. It is always on the corpse of a Buddha that a
These are analogies. Women can attain to their feminine mystique easily; that
is the reason more women become attracted towards religion. They don't create
religion -- but more women, almost four times more than men, become interested
in religion. Among Mahavir's disciples, forty thousand were women and ten
thousand men; and the proportion was the same with Buddha's disciples. Go to
any church and any temple and just count -- you will always find four women to
one man, and that one may have come just because the wife has come; he may not
be really there.
Women can become more easily attuned; they are mothers, they are nearer
nature. Man will find it a little difficult to come back; he has involvements,
commitments, investments in his anxiety and tension. Even if he comes he will
create an anxiety around religion.
This is my everyday observation: women come to me -- if they surrender, they
surrender totally. If they meditate at all, they meditate totally. Then simply
they start growing.
Men come to me -- if they surrender they cannot surrender totally, a part
they always save. And when you surrender half-heartedly it is not a surrender
at all. Then they meditate, but then meditation becomes an anxiety. And they
come and they say, "Now this meditation is creating anxiety. I cannot sleep. I
am constantly thinking about it -- how it is going to happen, how I am to
It is not a management. You cannot manage it. You have to be in a let-go, a
great let-go. It is difficult for man; he is so disciplined for anxiety, so
trained to be tense. From the very childhood, the society forces men to become
MEN -- aggressive, violent, always reaching for something, trying to achieve
something, ambitious. If they start playing with dolls the parents say, "Why?
What are you doing? Are you being a sissy? This is for girls, not for boys.
Home is for girls; to play with dolls is for girls, not for boys. They have to
go out, and fight their way into life. They have to struggle -- that is for
If home is for girls then at-homeness will also be for girls. Then you are
never at home; and at-homeness is meditation.
IT SEEMS TO REMAIN.
DRAW UPON IT
AND IT SERVES YOU WITH EASE.
The feminine mystique, the valley spirit, the hollowness --
IT SEEMS TO REMAIN.
-- it is always there-
DRAW UPON IT
AND IT SERVES YOU WITH EASE.
And it makes you total, it fills you with ease, at-homeness. Relaxation comes
Look at existence not as a struggle; but as an enjoyment; look at existence
not as a war, conflict, but as a celebration -- and infinite is the
celebration, infinite is the possibility of bliss -- bliss upon bliss.
"Energy Enhancement gives you Energy and Peace. It Quickens the Meditative process, makes it
faster, because now, Enlightenment is not enough!"
ENERGY TECHNIQUES !!
ENHANCEMENT, !!! ULTIMATE !!!!!! ANCIENT !!! !!! EFFECTIVE !!!!!
1. Get into Intense alignment with Your Own Kundalini Energy and Immediate
Access to the Meditative State.
2. Remove your Energy Blockages with The Circulation of the Energies, the
Kundalini Kriyas, Ancient Taoist Energy Circulations which have worked
effectively for 5000 years to help all towards ENLIGHTENMENT.
3. The Grounding of all your Negative Energies through Alchemical VITRIOL -
Become Incredibly POSITIVE and ENERGETIC!!
4. Alignment with Your Higher Self - INCREASE YOUR IQ, INCREASE YOUR LUCK,
ACCESS YOUR HIGHEST ENERGIES!! ACHIEVE WHAT YOU WERE PUT ON THIS PLANET TO DO.
5. Learn how to USE and Increase the LOVE of Your Heart Center to ZAP YOUR
NEGATIVE EMOTIONS AND DEVELOP PSYCHIC POWERS TO HEAL YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
6. Overcome ENERGY VAMPIRES - MASTER ENERGY PROTECTION AND MAINTAIN YOUR HIGH
7. EXPERIENCE INCREDIBLE RELATIONSHIPS WITH ENERGY ENHANCEMENT - THE CORE ENERGY
8. ENERGY ENHANCEMENT Techniques are the source of all Successful spiritual
training courses over the last 5000 years. Become a Jedi Master, a Gandalf, a
Transmitter of the FORCE a Bringer of the Light!!
GET MORE ENERGY!!!
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT -
!!! ULTIMATE !!!
!!! ANCIENT !!!
!!! EFFECTIVE !!!
!!! SUCCESSFUL !!!